<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T22:08:56.548302+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23194</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-23194 — rust_binder: correctly handle FDA objects of length zero</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T22:08:59.004738+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>rust_binder: correctly handle FDA objects of length zero</p>
<p>Fix a bug where an empty FDA (fd array) object with 0 fds would cause an
out-of-bounds error. The previous implementation used `skip == 0` to
mean "this is a pointer fixup", but 0 is also the correct skip length
for an empty FDA. If the FDA is at the end of the buffer, then this
results in an attempt to write 8-bytes out of bounds. This is caught and
results in an EINVAL error being returned to userspace.</p>
<p>The pattern of using `skip == 0` as a special value originates from the
C-implementation of Binder. As part of fixing this bug, this pattern is
replaced with a Rust enum.</p>
<p>I considered the alternate option of not pushing a fixup when the length
is zero, but I think it's cleaner to just get rid of the zero-is-special
stuff.</p>
<p>The root cause of this bug was diagnosed by Gemini CLI on first try. I
used the following prompt:</p>
<p>&gt; There appears to be a bug in @drivers/android/binder/thread.rs where
&gt; the Fixups oob bug is triggered with 316 304 316 324. This implies
&gt; that we somehow ended up with a fixup where buffer A has a pointer to
&gt; buffer B, but the pointer is located at an index in buffer A that is
&gt; out of bounds. Please investigate the code to find the bug. You may
&gt; compare with @drivers/android/binder.c that implements this correctly.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23194"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
