<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-30T07:52:10.966891+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-40220</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-40220 — fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T07:52:10.981590+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers</p>
<p>I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server.
This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file
descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete.
Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for
responses from the fuseblk server:</p>
<p># cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack
[&lt;0&gt;] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0
[&lt;0&gt;] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860
[&lt;0&gt;] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0
[&lt;0&gt;] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0
[&lt;0&gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53</p>
<p>But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for
responses from itself:</p>
<p># cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack
[&lt;0&gt;] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse]
[&lt;0&gt;] __fput+0xec/0x2b0
[&lt;0&gt;] task_work_run+0x55/0x90
[&lt;0&gt;] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100
[&lt;0&gt;] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0
[&lt;0&gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53</p>
<p>The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in
the server itself.  So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put?
The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-40220"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
