<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-05T23:22:32.800000+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-39744</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-39744 — rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work</title>
    <updated>2026-10-05T23:22:32.812483+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>rcu: Fix rcu_read_unlock() deadloop due to IRQ work</p>
<p>During rcu_read_unlock_special(), if this happens during irq_exit(), we
can lockup if an IPI is issued. This is because the IPI itself triggers
the irq_exit() path causing a recursive lock up.</p>
<p>This is precisely what Xiongfeng found when invoking a BPF program on
the trace_tick_stop() tracepoint As shown in the trace below. Fix by
managing the irq_work state correctly.</p>
<p>irq_exit()
  __irq_exit_rcu()
    /* in_hardirq() returns false after this */
    preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET)
    tick_irq_exit()
      tick_nohz_irq_exit()
	    tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick()
	      trace_tick_stop()  /* a bpf prog is hooked on this trace point */
		   __bpf_trace_tick_stop()
		      bpf_trace_run2()
			    rcu_read_unlock_special()
                              /* will send a IPI to itself */
			      irq_work_queue_on(&amp;rdp-&gt;defer_qs_iw, rdp-&gt;cpu);</p>
<p>A simple reproducer can also be obtained by doing the following in
tick_irq_exit(). It will hang on boot without the patch:</p>
<p>static inline void tick_irq_exit(void)
  {
 +	rcu_read_lock();
 +	WRITE_ONCE(current-&gt;rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs, true);
 +	rcu_read_unlock();
 +</p>
<p>[neeraj: Apply Frederic's suggested fix for PREEMPT_RT]</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-39744"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
