<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T07:34:36.184662+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38338</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-38338 — fs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T07:34:36.202873+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fs/nfs/read: fix double-unlock bug in nfs_return_empty_folio()</p>
<p>Sometimes, when a file was read while it was being truncated by
another NFS client, the kernel could deadlock because folio_unlock()
was called twice, and the second call would XOR back the `PG_locked`
flag.</p>
<p>Most of the time (depending on the timing of the truncation), nobody
notices the problem because folio_unlock() gets called three times,
which flips `PG_locked` back off:</p>
<p>1. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... nfs_read_add_folio,
    nfs_return_empty_folio
 2. vfs_read, nfs_read_folio, ... netfs_read_collection,
    netfs_unlock_abandoned_read_pages
 3. vfs_read, ... nfs_do_read_folio, nfs_read_add_folio,
    nfs_return_empty_folio</p>
<p>The problem is that nfs_read_add_folio() is not supposed to unlock the
folio if fscache is enabled, and a nfs_netfs_folio_unlock() check is
missing in nfs_return_empty_folio().</p>
<p>Rarely this leads to a warning in netfs_read_collection():</p>
<p>------------[ cut here ]------------
 R=0000031c: folio 10 is not locked
 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 29 at fs/netfs/read_collect.c:133 netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00
 [...]
 Workqueue: events_unbound netfs_read_collection_worker
 RIP: 0010:netfs_read_collection+0x7c0/0xf00
 [...]
 Call Trace:
  &lt;TASK&gt;
  netfs_read_collection_worker+0x67/0x80
  process_one_work+0x12e/0x2c0
  worker_thread+0x295/0x3a0</p>
<p>Most of the time, however, processes just get stuck forever in
folio_wait_bit_common…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-38338"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
