<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T08:44:11.676367+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-21674</id>
    <title>CVE-2025-21674 — net/mlx5e: Fix inversion dependency warning while enabling IPsec tunnel</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T08:44:11.692653+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net/mlx5e: Fix inversion dependency warning while enabling IPsec tunnel</p>
<p>Attempt to enable IPsec packet offload in tunnel mode in debug kernel
generates the following kernel panic, which is happening due to two
issues:
1. In SA add section, the should be _bh() variant when marking SA mode.
2. There is not needed flush_workqueue in SA delete routine. It is not
needed as at this stage as it is removed from SADB and the running work
will be canceled later in SA free.</p>
<p>=====================================================
 WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -&gt; SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
 6.12.0+ #4 Not tainted
 -----------------------------------------------------
 charon/1337 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire:
 ffff88810f365020 (&amp;xa-&gt;xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]</p>
<p>and this task is already holding:
 ffff88813e0f0d48 (&amp;x-&gt;lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30
 which would create a new lock dependency:
  (&amp;x-&gt;lock){+.-.}-{3:3} -&gt; (&amp;xa-&gt;xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3}</p>
<p>but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
  (&amp;x-&gt;lock){+.-.}-{3:3}</p>
<p>... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at:
   lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520
   _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40
   xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70
   __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60
   hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0
   handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860
   irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0
   sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90
   asm_sys…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2025-21674"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
