<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T18:39:44.930588+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-27014</id>
    <title>CVE-2024-27014 — net/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T18:39:44.934522+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>net/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS</p>
<p>When disabling aRFS under the `priv-&gt;state_lock`, any scheduled
aRFS works are canceled using the `cancel_work_sync` function,
which waits for the work to end if it has already started.
However, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will
try to acquire the `state_lock` which is already acquired.</p>
<p>The worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state
is down, which is not the worker's responsibility since
disabling aRFS deletes the rules.</p>
<p>Add an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is
enabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.</p>
<p>Kernel log:</p>
<p>======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G          I
------------------------------------------------------
ethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(&amp;rule-&gt;arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0</p>
<p>but task is already holding lock:
ffff8884a1808cc0 (&amp;priv-&gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]</p>
<p>which lock already depends on the new lock.</p>
<p>the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:</p>
<p>-&gt; #1 (&amp;priv-&gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90
       arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core]
       process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0
       worker_thread+0x1bf/0x…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-27014"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
