<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T11:22:17.785728+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-58416</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-58416 — Fork-PR Actions task can read a third private repository via the collaborative-owner branch (missing fork-PR guard)</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T11:22:18.054555+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Gitea Open Source Git Server</p>
<p>Fork-PR Actions task can read a third private repository via the collaborative-owner branch (missing fork-PR guard)</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-58416"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-fj8v-hjwv-qm88</id>
    <title>GHSA-fj8v-hjwv-qm88 — Gitea: Fork-PR Actions task can read a third private repository via the collaborative-owner branch (missing fork-PR gua…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T11:22:18.054755+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Go: gitea.dev</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>`GetActionsUserRepoPermission` (`models/perm/access/repo_permission.go`) decides whether an Actions
task token may access a target repo. Its cross-repo branches each enforce a fork-PR discriminator —
**except the collaborative-owner branch**, which is missing the `!task.IsForkPullRequest` guard that
its sibling has. As a result, when a private repo **B** lists owner **A** as a collaborative owner, an
**attacker-controlled fork pull-request** workflow whose base repo is owned by A is granted code-read
on B — i.e. the fork's YAML can clone a third private repository it has no rights to.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>```go
// models/perm/access/repo_permission.go (v1.26.2), in GetActionsUserRepoPermission
if checkSameOwnerCrossRepoAccess(ctx, taskRepo, repo, task.IsForkPullRequest) { // passes isForkPR -&gt; denies forks
    return maxPerm, nil
}
...
if taskRepo.IsPrivate {                                   // &lt;-- NO IsForkPullRequest check here
    actionsUnit := repo.MustGetUnit(ctx, unit.TypeActions)
    if actionsUnit.ActionsConfig().IsCollaborativeOwner(taskRepo.OwnerID) {
        return maxPerm, nil                              // grants code-read to target repo B
    }
}
```</p>
<p>The sibling same-owner path correctly denies fork PRs:</p>
<p>```go
func checkSameOwnerCrossRepoAccess(ctx, taskRepo, targetRepo, isForkPR bool) bool {
    if isForkPR {
        return false // Fork PRs are never allowed cross-repo access to other private repositories.
    }
    ...
}
```</p>
<p>`taskRepo` = the repo…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-fj8v-hjwv-qm88"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
