<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-06T20:33:51.804368+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53308</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-53308 — power: supply: max77705: Free allocated workqueue and fix removal order</title>
    <updated>2026-10-06T20:33:51.826515+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>power: supply: max77705: Free allocated workqueue and fix removal order</p>
<p>Use devm interface for allocating workqueue to fix two bugs at the same
time:</p>
<p>1. Driver leaks the memory on remove(), because the workqueue is not
   destroyed.</p>
<p>2. Driver allocates workqueue and then registers interrupt handlers
   with devm interface.  This means that probe error paths will not use a
   reversed order, but first destroy the workqueue and then, via devm
   release handlers, free the interrupt.</p>
<p>The interrupt handler schedules work on this exact workqueue, thus if
   interrupt is hit in this short time window - after destroying
   workqueue, but before devm() frees the interrupt - the schedulled
   work will lead to use of freed memory.</p>
<p>Change is not equivalent in the workqueue itself: use non-legacy API
which does not set (__WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM).  The workqueue is
used to update power supply (power_supply_changed()) status, thus there
is no point to run it for memory reclaim.  Note that dev_name() is not
directly used in second argument to prevent possible unlikely parsing
any "%" character in device name as format.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-53308"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
