<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T13:33:20.182881+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45933</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-45933 — bpf: Preserve id of register in sync_linked_regs()</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T13:33:20.184506+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>bpf: Preserve id of register in sync_linked_regs()</p>
<p>sync_linked_regs() copies the id of known_reg to reg when propagating
bounds of known_reg to reg using the off of known_reg, but when
known_reg was linked to reg like:</p>
<p>known_reg = reg         ; both known_reg and reg get same id
known_reg += 4          ; known_reg gets off = 4, and its id gets BPF_ADD_CONST</p>
<p>now when a call to sync_linked_regs() happens, let's say with the following:</p>
<p>if known_reg &gt;= 10 goto pc+2</p>
<p>known_reg's new bounds are propagated to reg but now reg gets
BPF_ADD_CONST from the copy.</p>
<p>This means if another link to reg is created like:</p>
<p>another_reg = reg       ; another_reg should get the id of reg but
                          assign_scalar_id_before_mov() sees
                          BPF_ADD_CONST on reg and assigns a new id to it.</p>
<p>As reg has a new id now, known_reg's link to reg is broken. If we find
new bounds for known_reg, they will not be propagated to reg.</p>
<p>This can be seen in the selftest added in the next commit:</p>
<p>0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7    ; R0=scalar()
1: (57) r0 &amp;= 255                     ; R0=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
2: (bf) r1 = r0                       ; R0=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R1=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))
3: (07) r1 += 4                       ; R1=scalar(id=1+4…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-45933"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
