<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-29T17:11:20.184436+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23238</id>
    <title>CVE-2026-23238 — romfs: check sb_set_blocksize() return value</title>
    <updated>2026-09-29T17:11:20.605788+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Linux, Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>romfs: check sb_set_blocksize() return value</p>
<p>romfs_fill_super() ignores the return value of sb_set_blocksize(), which
can fail if the requested block size is incompatible with the block
device's configuration.</p>
<p>This can be triggered by setting a loop device's block size larger than
PAGE_SIZE using ioctl(LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE, 32768), then mounting a romfs
filesystem on that device.</p>
<p>When sb_set_blocksize(sb, ROMBSIZE) is called with ROMBSIZE=4096 but the
device has logical_block_size=32768, bdev_validate_blocksize() fails
because the requested size is smaller than the device's logical block
size. sb_set_blocksize() returns 0 (failure), but romfs ignores this and
continues mounting.</p>
<p>The superblock's block size remains at the device's logical block size
(32768). Later, when sb_bread() attempts I/O with this oversized block
size, it triggers a kernel BUG in folio_set_bh():</p>
<p>kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:1582!
    BUG_ON(size &gt; PAGE_SIZE);</p>
<p>Fix by checking the return value of sb_set_blocksize() and failing the
mount with -EINVAL if it returns 0.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2026-23238"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
