<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-03T14:59:09.618188+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-3596</id>
    <title>CVE-2024-3596 — RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:59:10.110287+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> IETF RFC, Siemens CPC80 Central Processing/Communication, Siemens CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication, Siemens POWER METER SICAM Q100 family, Siemens POWER METER SICAM Q200 family, Siemens Powerlink IP, Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808, Siemens RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW, Siemens RUGGEDCOM i800, Siemens RUGGEDCOM i800NC and 467 more</p>
<p>RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2024-3596"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-7055-1</id>
    <title>USN-7055-1 — freeradius vulnerability</title>
    <updated>2026-10-03T14:59:10.111150+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: freeradius, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: freeradius, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: freeradius</p>
<p>Goldberg, Miro Haller, Nadia Heninger, Mike Milano, Dan Shumow, Marc
Stevens, and Adam Suhl discovered that FreeRADIUS incorrectly authenticated
certain responses. An attacker able to intercept communications between a
RADIUS client and server could possibly use this issue to forge responses,
bypass authentication, and access network devices and services.</p>
<p>This update introduces new configuration options called "limit_proxy_state"
and "require_message_authenticator" that default to "auto" but should be
set to "yes" once all RADIUS devices have been upgraded on a network.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-7055-1"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
