<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-01T13:07:28.795598+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-6110</id>
    <title>CVE-2023-6110 — Openstack: deleting a non existing access rule deletes another existing access rule in it's scope</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T13:07:29.329838+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 8, Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 for RHEL 9, Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1, Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2, Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.0, Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0</p>
<p>A flaw was found in OpenStack. When a user tries to delete a non-existing access rule in it's scope, it deletes other existing access rules which are not associated with any application credentials.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/cve-2023-6110"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-6668-1</id>
    <title>USN-6668-1 — python-openstackclient vulnerability</title>
    <updated>2026-10-01T13:07:29.329957+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: python-openstackclient, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-openstackclient</p>
<p>It was discovered that when python-openstackclient attempted to delete a
non-existing access rule, it would delete another existing access rule
instead, contrary to expectations.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/usn-6668-1"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
