<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-28T16:55:21.892247+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97985</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-97985</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:55:21.907262+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>af_unix: Update last skb marker in manage_oob().</p>
<p>Fahad Alharbi reported that blocking recv(MSG_PEEK) could hog CPU
due to OOB skb.</p>
<p>In the following cases, manage_oob() skips OOB skb(s) and returns
NULL for the last recv(MSG_PEEK):</p>
<p>socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sk);</p>
<p>1) skb -&gt; OOB skb -&gt; NULL
     send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);</p>
<p>2) skb -&gt; consumed OOB skb -&gt; NULL
     send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);</p>
<p>3) consumed OOB skb -&gt; OOB skb -&gt; NULL
     send(sk[0], "a", 1, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_OOB);
     send(sk[0], "b", 1, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_PEEK);</p>
<p>Then, @copied is 0 in unix_stream_read_generic() (zero-length buffer,
or non-OOB skb is not yet consumed), and unix_stream_data_wait() is
called.</p>
<p>However, it returns immediately because @last is not updated in
unix_stream_read_generic(), and the thread busy-waits for a new skb.</p>
<p>Let's update @last in manage_oob().</p>
<p>For MSG_PEEK, @last is updated with the skipped OOB, and for the
non-peek case, @last matches the returned value (when !copied)
because OOB is unlinked.</p>
<p>Note that manage_oob() is inlined and no stack canary is added.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97985"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-cq66-2f6w-rhg5</id>
    <title>GHSA-cq66-2f6w-rhg5</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:55:21.907388+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>af_unix: Update last skb marker in manage_oob().</p>
<p>Fahad Alharbi reported that blocking recv(MSG_PEEK) could hog CPU
due to OOB skb.</p>
<p>In the following cases, manage_oob() skips OOB skb(s) and returns
NULL for the last recv(MSG_PEEK):</p>
<p>socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sk);</p>
<p>1) skb -&gt; OOB skb -&gt; NULL
     send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);</p>
<p>2) skb -&gt; consumed OOB skb -&gt; NULL
     send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);</p>
<p>3) consumed OOB skb -&gt; OOB skb -&gt; NULL
     send(sk[0], "a", 1, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_OOB);
     send(sk[0], "b", 1, MSG_OOB);
     recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_PEEK);</p>
<p>Then, @copied is 0 in unix_stream_read_generic() (zero-length buffer,
or non-OOB skb is not yet consumed), and unix_stream_data_wait() is
called.</p>
<p>However, it returns immediately because @last is not updated in
unix_stream_read_generic(), and the thread busy-waits for a new skb.</p>
<p>Let's update @last in manage_oob().</p>
<p>For MSG_PEEK, @last is updated with the skipped OOB, and for the
non-peek case, @last matches the returned value (when !copied)
because OOB is unlinked.</p>
<p>Note that manage_oob() is inlined and no stack canary is added.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-cq66-2f6w-rhg5"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97985</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97985</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:55:21.907457+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Update last skb marker in manage_oob(). Fahad Alharbi reported that blocking recv(MSG_PEEK) could hog CPU due to OOB skb. In the following cases, manage_oob() skips OOB skb(s) and returns NULL for the last recv(MSG_PEEK):   socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sk);   1) skb -&gt; OOB skb -&gt; NULL      send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);      recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);   2) skb -&gt; consumed OOB skb -&gt; NULL      send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);      recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_OOB);      recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);   3) consumed OOB skb -&gt; OOB skb -&gt; NULL      send(sk[0], "a", 1, MSG_OOB);      recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_OOB);      send(sk[0], "b", 1, MSG_OOB);      recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_PEEK); Then, @copied is 0 in unix_stream_read_generic() (zero-length buffer, or non-OOB skb is not yet consumed), and unix_stream_data_wait() is called. However, it returns immediately because @last is not updated in unix_stream_read_generic(), and the thread busy-waits for a new skb. Let's update @last in manage_oob(). For MSG_PEEK, @last is updated with the skipped OOB, and for the non-peek case, @last matches the returned value (when !copied) because OOB is unlinked. Note that manage_oob() is inlined and no stack canary is added.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97985"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3579 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:55:21.907933+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
