<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-28T16:08:52.921142+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97925</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-97925</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:08:52.988686+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>tick/broadcast: Plug clockevents replacement race</p>
<p>朱恺乾 reported and decoded the following race condition when a broadcast
device is replaced:</p>
<p>CPUA					CPUB
 __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control()
   bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
					tick_install_broadcast_device(dev)
        				clockevents_exchange_device(cur, dev)
					   shutdown(cur);
					   detach(cur);
					   cur-&gt;handler = noop;
					   tick_broadcast_device.evtdev = dev;</p>
<p>tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, next_event); &lt;- FAIL: arms a detached device.</p>
<p>If the original broadcast device has a restricted interrupt affinity mask
and the last CPU in that mask goes offline then the BUG() in
tick_cleanup_dead_cpu() triggers because the clockevent device is not in
detached state.</p>
<p>The reason for this is that tick_install_broadcast_device() is not
serialized vs. tick broadcast operations.</p>
<p>The obvious cure is to serialize tick_install_broadcast_device() with
tick_broadcast_lock against a concurrent tick broadcast operation.</p>
<p>That requires to split clockevents_exchange_device() into two parts, one
which does the exchange, shutdown and detach operation and the other which
drops the module reference count. This is required because the module
reference cannot be dropped while holding tick_broadcast_lock.</p>
<p>Let clockevents_exchange_device() do both operations as before, but let the
broadcast device code take the two step approach and do the device
exchange under…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-97925"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-frpq-r7pw-xq84</id>
    <title>GHSA-frpq-r7pw-xq84</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:08:52.988826+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>tick/broadcast: Plug clockevents replacement race</p>
<p>朱恺乾 reported and decoded the following race condition when a broadcast
device is replaced:</p>
<p>CPUA					CPUB
 __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control()
   bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
					tick_install_broadcast_device(dev)
        				clockevents_exchange_device(cur, dev)
					   shutdown(cur);
					   detach(cur);
					   cur-&gt;handler = noop;
					   tick_broadcast_device.evtdev = dev;</p>
<p>tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, next_event); &lt;- FAIL: arms a detached device.</p>
<p>If the original broadcast device has a restricted interrupt affinity mask
and the last CPU in that mask goes offline then the BUG() in
tick_cleanup_dead_cpu() triggers because the clockevent device is not in
detached state.</p>
<p>The reason for this is that tick_install_broadcast_device() is not
serialized vs. tick broadcast operations.</p>
<p>The obvious cure is to serialize tick_install_broadcast_device() with
tick_broadcast_lock against a concurrent tick broadcast operation.</p>
<p>That requires to split clockevents_exchange_device() into two parts, one
which does the exchange, shutdown and detach operation and the other which
drops the module reference count. This is required because the module
reference cannot be dropped while holding tick_broadcast_lock.</p>
<p>Let clockevents_exchange_device() do both operations as before, but let the
broadcast device code take the two step approach and do the device
exchange under…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-frpq-r7pw-xq84"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97925</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-97925</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:08:52.988897+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tick/broadcast: Plug clockevents replacement race 朱恺乾 reported and decoded the following race condition when a broadcast device is replaced: CPUA					CPUB  __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control()    bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev; 					tick_install_broadcast_device(dev)         				clockevents_exchange_device(cur, dev) 					   shutdown(cur); 					   detach(cur); 					   cur-&gt;handler = noop; 					   tick_broadcast_device.evtdev = dev;   tick_broadcast_set_event(bc, next_event); &lt;- FAIL: arms a detached device. If the original broadcast device has a restricted interrupt affinity mask and the last CPU in that mask goes offline then the BUG() in tick_cleanup_dead_cpu() triggers because the clockevent device is not in detached state. The reason for this is that tick_install_broadcast_device() is not serialized vs. tick broadcast operations. The obvious cure is to serialize tick_install_broadcast_device() with tick_broadcast_lock against a concurrent tick broadcast operation. That requires to split clockevents_exchange_device() into two parts, one which does the exchange, shutdown and detach operation and the other which drops the module reference count. This is required because the module reference cannot be dropped while holding tick_broadcast_lock. Let clockevents_exchange_device() do both operations as before, but let the broadcast device code take the two step approach and do the device exchange under tick_broa…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-97925"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579</id>
    <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3579 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T16:08:52.989373+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen oder nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3579"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
