<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-28T18:54:56.847887+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@circl.lu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-55235</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-55235</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T18:54:56.900029+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>langgraph-api implements the LangGraph API for rapid development and testing. Prior to 0.10.0, langgraph-api permits a run or cron to specify a relative webhook target that is delivered through an in-process loopback transport, and the authentication middleware treats that transport as internal without applying the authentication context used for external requests. In deployments that rely on per-user authorization to separate threads and runs, an authenticated user can direct a webhook to the server's own thread and run routes, allowing creation of a run on or modification of another user's thread and limited incorporation of the targeted thread's metadata into the created run record. The affected path requires webhook targets and per-user authorization boundaries; deployments that deliberately re-enable loopback delivery should restrict it to controlled same-process routes because those webhooks remain unauthenticated. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-55235"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-2c9q-c2q9-qgqv</id>
    <title>GHSA-2c9q-c2q9-qgqv — langgraph-api: Relative webhook targets in LangGraph Server can reach in-process routes without authentication</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T18:54:56.900159+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: langgraph-api</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>In affected versions of `langgraph-api` (the LangGraph Server runtime), a run or cron could be created with a relative webhook target. When the server later delivers such a webhook, it routes the request back into the same application through an in-process loopback transport that the authentication middleware treats as internal and does not authenticate. As a result, a relative webhook target could reach the server's own routes that operate on threads and runs without the authentication context that applies to ordinary external requests.</p>
<p>In deployments that scope threads and runs by owner, this could allow a request associated with one user to reach routes operating on another user's thread, resulting in creation of a run on (or modification of the state of) a thread owned by another user, even where the corresponding direct external requests were correctly denied. Limited metadata from the targeted thread may be incorporated into the created run record.</p>
<p>We have no evidence of this behavior occurring in the wild.</p>
<p>## Affected users / systems</p>
<p>You may be affected if you:</p>
<p>- run `langgraph-api` (the LangGraph Server / Agent Server runtime, including via the LangGraph Platform Helm chart),
- allow runs or crons to specify webhook targets, and
- rely on per-user authorization to separate threads and runs between users.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>- Integrity: creation of a run on, or modification of the state of, a thread owned by another user, beyond the requesting user's authori…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/ghsa-2c9q-c2q9-qgqv"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-3857</id>
    <title>PYSEC-2026-3857 — langgraph-api: Relative webhook targets in LangGraph Server can reach in-process routes without authentication</title>
    <updated>2026-09-28T18:54:56.900269+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: langgraph-api</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>In affected versions of `langgraph-api` (the LangGraph Server runtime), a run or cron could be created with a relative webhook target. When the server later delivers such a webhook, it routes the request back into the same application through an in-process loopback transport that the authentication middleware treats as internal and does not authenticate. As a result, a relative webhook target could reach the server's own routes that operate on threads and runs without the authentication context that applies to ordinary external requests.</p>
<p>In deployments that scope threads and runs by owner, this could allow a request associated with one user to reach routes operating on another user's thread, resulting in creation of a run on (or modification of the state of) a thread owned by another user, even where the corresponding direct external requests were correctly denied. Limited metadata from the targeted thread may be incorporated into the created run record.</p>
<p>We have no evidence of this behavior occurring in the wild.</p>
<p>## Affected users / systems</p>
<p>You may be affected if you:</p>
<p>- run `langgraph-api` (the LangGraph Server / Agent Server runtime, including via the LangGraph Platform Helm chart),
- allow runs or crons to specify webhook targets, and
- rely on per-user authorization to separate threads and runs between users.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>- Integrity: creation of a run on, or modification of the state of, a thread owned by another user, beyond the requesting user's authori…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://vulnerability.circl.lu/vuln/pysec-2026-3857"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
