ID |
CVE-2017-0114
|
Summary |
Uniscribe in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 SP1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via a crafted web site, aka "Uniscribe Information Disclosure Vulnerability." CVE-2017-0085, CVE-2017-0091, CVE-2017-0092, CVE-2017-0111, CVE-2017-0112, CVE-2017-0113, CVE-2017-0115, CVE-2017-0116, CVE-2017-0117, CVE-2017-0118, CVE-2017-0119, CVE-2017-0120, CVE-2017-0121, CVE-2017-0122, CVE-2017-0123, CVE-2017-0124, CVE-2017-0125, CVE-2017-0126, CVE-2017-0127, and CVE-2017-0128. |
References |
|
Vulnerable Configurations |
-
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:r2:sp1
-
Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 2
cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_vista:-:sp2
-
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:-:sp2
-
cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_7:-:sp1
cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_7:-:sp1
|
CVSS |
Base: | 4.3 (as of 17-03-2017 - 10:38) |
Impact: | |
Exploitability: | |
|
CWE |
CWE-200 |
CAPEC |
-
Subverting Environment Variable Values
The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
-
Footprinting
An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
-
Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client.
An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client.
There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
-
Browser Fingerprinting
An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
-
Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
-
Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
-
Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
|
Access |
Vector | Complexity | Authentication |
NETWORK |
MEDIUM |
NONE |
|
Impact |
Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
PARTIAL |
NONE |
NONE |
|
exploit-db
via4
|
description | Microsoft Windows - Uniscribe Font Processing Multiple Heap-Based Out-of-Bounds and Wild Reads (MS17-011). CVE-2017-0083,CVE-2017-0091,CVE-2017-0092,CVE-2017... | file | exploits/windows/dos/41655.txt | id | EDB-ID:41655 | last seen | 2017-03-20 | modified | 2017-03-20 | platform | windows | port | | published | 2017-03-20 | reporter | Exploit-DB | source | https://www.exploit-db.com/download/41655/ | title | Microsoft Windows - Uniscribe Font Processing Multiple Heap-Based Out-of-Bounds and Wild Reads (MS17-011) | type | dos |
|
msbulletin
via4
|
bulletin_id | MS17-011 | bulletin_url | | date | 2017-03-14T00:00:00 | impact | Remote Code Execution | knowledgebase_id | 4013076 | knowledgebase_url | | severity | Critical | title | Security Update for Microsoft Uniscribe |
|
nessus
via4
|
NASL family | Windows : Microsoft Bulletins | NASL id | SMB_NT_MS17-011.NASL | description | The remote Windows host is missing a security update. It is,
therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :
- Multiple remote code execution vulnerabilities exist
in Windows Uniscribe due to improper handling of
objects in memory. An unauthenticated, remote attacker
can exploit these to execute arbitrary code by
convincing a user to view a specially crafted website
or open a specially crafted document file.
(CVE-2017-0072, CVE-2017-0083, CVE-2017-0084,
CVE-2017-0086, CVE-2017-0087, CVE-2017-0088,
CVE-2017-0089, CVE-2017-0090)
- Multiple information disclosure vulnerabilities exist
in Windows Uniscribe that allow an unauthenticated,
remote attacker to gain access to sensitive
information by convincing a user to view a specially
crafted website or open a specially crafted document
file. (CVE-2017-0085, CVE-2017-0091, CVE-2017-0092,
CVE-2017-0111, CVE-2017-0112, CVE-2017-0113,
CVE-2017-0114, CVE-2017-0115, CVE-2017-0116,
CVE-2017-0117, CVE-2017-0118, CVE-2017-0119,
CVE-2017-0120, CVE-2017-0121, CVE-2017-0122,
CVE-2017-0123, CVE-2017-0124, CVE-2017-0125,
CVE-2017-0126, CVE-2017-0127, CVE-2017-0128) | last seen | 2019-01-16 | modified | 2018-11-15 | plugin id | 97732 | published | 2017-03-14 | reporter | Tenable | source | https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=97732 | title | MS17-011: Security Update for Microsoft Uniscribe (4013076) |
|
refmap
via4
|
|
Last major update |
17-03-2017 - 21:59 |
Published |
16-03-2017 - 20:59 |
Last modified |
15-08-2017 - 21:29 |