ID CVE-2016-5416
Summary 389 Directory Server in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop 6 through 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux HPC Node 6 through 7, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 6 through 7, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 6 through 7 allows remote attackers to read the default Access Control Instructions.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop 6.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:6.0
  • RedHat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:7.0
  • RedHat Enterprise Linux HPC Node 6.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_hpc_node:6.0
  • RedHat Enterprise Linux HPC Node 7.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_hpc_node:7.0
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 6.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:6.0
  • RedHat Enterprise Linux Server 7.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:7.0
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation 6.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:6.0
  • RedHat Enterprise Linux Workstation 7.0
    cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:7.0
CVSS
Base: 5.0
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-200
CAPEC
  • Subverting Environment Variable Values
    The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
  • Footprinting
    An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • Browser Fingerprinting
    An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
  • Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
    This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
  • Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
    This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
nessus via4
  • NASL family Scientific Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id SL_20161103_389_DS_BASE_ON_SL7_X.NASL
    description The following packages have been upgraded to a newer upstream version: 389 -ds-base (1.3.5.10). Security Fix(es) : - It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) - An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) - It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) The CVE-2016-5416 issue was discovered by Viktor Ashirov (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4992 issue was discovered by Petr Spacek (Red Hat) and Martin Basti (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-5405 issue was discovered by William Brown (Red Hat). Additional Changes :
    last seen 2018-01-27
    modified 2018-01-26
    plugin id 95832
    published 2016-12-15
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=95832
    title Scientific Linux Security Update : 389-ds-base on SL7.x x86_64
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2016-2594.NASL
    description An update for 389-ds-base is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration. The following packages have been upgraded to a newer upstream version: 389-ds-base (1.3.5.10). (BZ#1270020) Security Fix(es) : * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) * An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) The CVE-2016-5416 issue was discovered by Viktor Ashirov (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4992 issue was discovered by Petr Spacek (Red Hat) and Martin Basti (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-5405 issue was discovered by William Brown (Red Hat). Additional Changes : For detailed information on changes in this release, see the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 Release Notes linked from the References section.
    last seen 2018-01-26
    modified 2018-01-25
    plugin id 94557
    published 2016-11-04
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=94557
    title RHEL 7 : 389-ds-base (RHSA-2016:2594)
  • NASL family CentOS Local Security Checks
    NASL id CENTOS_RHSA-2016-2594.NASL
    description An update for 389-ds-base is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration. The following packages have been upgraded to a newer upstream version: 389-ds-base (1.3.5.10). (BZ#1270020) Security Fix(es) : * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) * An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) The CVE-2016-5416 issue was discovered by Viktor Ashirov (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4992 issue was discovered by Petr Spacek (Red Hat) and Martin Basti (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-5405 issue was discovered by William Brown (Red Hat). Additional Changes : For detailed information on changes in this release, see the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 Release Notes linked from the References section.
    last seen 2018-01-26
    modified 2018-01-25
    plugin id 95340
    published 2016-11-28
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=95340
    title CentOS 7 : 389-ds-base (CESA-2016:2594)
  • NASL family Fedora Local Security Checks
    NASL id FEDORA_2016-8660C7656F.NASL
    description Bump version to 1.3.5.15-1 Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora update system website. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2018-02-02
    modified 2018-02-01
    plugin id 94591
    published 2016-11-07
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=94591
    title Fedora 24 : 389-ds-base (2016-8660c7656f)
  • NASL family Oracle Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ORACLELINUX_ELSA-2016-2765.NASL
    description From Red Hat Security Advisory 2016:2765 : An update for 389-ds-base is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration. Security Fix(es) : * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) * An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) The CVE-2016-5416 issue was discovered by Viktor Ashirov (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4992 issue was discovered by Petr Spacek (Red Hat) and Martin Basti (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-5405 issue was discovered by William Brown (Red Hat). Bug Fix(es) : * Previously, a bug in the changelog iterator buffer caused it to point to an incorrect position when reloading the buffer. This caused replication to skip parts of the changelog, and consequently some changes were not replicated. This bug has been fixed, and replication data loss due to an incorrectly reloaded changelog buffer no longer occurs. (BZ#1354331) * Previously, if internal modifications were generated on a consumer (for example by the Account Policy plug-in) and additional changes to the same attributes were received from replication, a bug caused Directory Server to accumulate state information on the consumer. The bug has been fixed by making sure that replace operations are only applied if they are newer than existing attribute deletion change sequence numbers (CSNs), and state information no longer accumulates in this situation. (BZ#1379599) Enhancement(s) : * In a multi-master replication environment where multiple masters receive updates at the same time, it was previously possible for a single master to obtain exclusive access to a replica and hold it for a very long time due to problems such as a slow network connection. During this time, other masters were blocked from accessing the same replica, which considerably slowed down the replication process. This update adds a new configuration attribute, 'nsds5ReplicaReleaseTimeout', which can be used to specify a timeout in seconds. After the specified timeout period passes, the master releases the replica, allowing other masters to access it and send their updates. (BZ#1358390)
    last seen 2018-02-02
    modified 2018-02-01
    plugin id 94907
    published 2016-11-16
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=94907
    title Oracle Linux 6 : 389-ds-base (ELSA-2016-2765)
  • NASL family Fedora Local Security Checks
    NASL id FEDORA_2016-8F9D466BCC.NASL
    description Bump version to 1.3.5.15-1 Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora update system website. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2018-02-02
    modified 2018-02-01
    plugin id 95012
    published 2016-11-21
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=95012
    title Fedora 25 : 389-ds-base (2016-8f9d466bcc)
  • NASL family CentOS Local Security Checks
    NASL id CENTOS_RHSA-2016-2765.NASL
    description An update for 389-ds-base is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration. Security Fix(es) : * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) * An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) The CVE-2016-5416 issue was discovered by Viktor Ashirov (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4992 issue was discovered by Petr Spacek (Red Hat) and Martin Basti (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-5405 issue was discovered by William Brown (Red Hat). Bug Fix(es) : * Previously, a bug in the changelog iterator buffer caused it to point to an incorrect position when reloading the buffer. This caused replication to skip parts of the changelog, and consequently some changes were not replicated. This bug has been fixed, and replication data loss due to an incorrectly reloaded changelog buffer no longer occurs. (BZ#1354331) * Previously, if internal modifications were generated on a consumer (for example by the Account Policy plug-in) and additional changes to the same attributes were received from replication, a bug caused Directory Server to accumulate state information on the consumer. The bug has been fixed by making sure that replace operations are only applied if they are newer than existing attribute deletion change sequence numbers (CSNs), and state information no longer accumulates in this situation. (BZ#1379599) Enhancement(s) : * In a multi-master replication environment where multiple masters receive updates at the same time, it was previously possible for a single master to obtain exclusive access to a replica and hold it for a very long time due to problems such as a slow network connection. During this time, other masters were blocked from accessing the same replica, which considerably slowed down the replication process. This update adds a new configuration attribute, 'nsds5ReplicaReleaseTimeout', which can be used to specify a timeout in seconds. After the specified timeout period passes, the master releases the replica, allowing other masters to access it and send their updates. (BZ#1358390)
    last seen 2018-01-26
    modified 2018-01-25
    plugin id 94979
    published 2016-11-21
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=94979
    title CentOS 6 : 389-ds-base (CESA-2016:2765)
  • NASL family Amazon Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ALA_ALAS-2016-773.NASL
    description CVE-2016-5405 389-ds-base: Password verification vulnerable to timing attack It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. CVE-2016-5416 389-ds-base: ACI readable by anonymous user It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. CVE-2016-4992 389-ds-base: Information disclosure via repeated use of LDAP ADD operation An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not.
    last seen 2018-04-19
    modified 2018-04-18
    plugin id 95893
    published 2016-12-16
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=95893
    title Amazon Linux AMI : 389-ds-base (ALAS-2016-773)
  • NASL family Oracle Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ORACLELINUX_ELSA-2016-2594.NASL
    description From Red Hat Security Advisory 2016:2594 : An update for 389-ds-base is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration. The following packages have been upgraded to a newer upstream version: 389-ds-base (1.3.5.10). (BZ#1270020) Security Fix(es) : * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) * An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) The CVE-2016-5416 issue was discovered by Viktor Ashirov (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4992 issue was discovered by Petr Spacek (Red Hat) and Martin Basti (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-5405 issue was discovered by William Brown (Red Hat). Additional Changes : For detailed information on changes in this release, see the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.3 Release Notes linked from the References section.
    last seen 2018-02-02
    modified 2018-02-01
    plugin id 94714
    published 2016-11-11
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=94714
    title Oracle Linux 7 : 389-ds-base (ELSA-2016-2594)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2016-2765.NASL
    description An update for 389-ds-base is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section. 389 Directory Server is an LDAP version 3 (LDAPv3) compliant server. The base packages include the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) server and command-line utilities for server administration. Security Fix(es) : * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) * An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) * It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) The CVE-2016-5416 issue was discovered by Viktor Ashirov (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4992 issue was discovered by Petr Spacek (Red Hat) and Martin Basti (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-5405 issue was discovered by William Brown (Red Hat). Bug Fix(es) : * Previously, a bug in the changelog iterator buffer caused it to point to an incorrect position when reloading the buffer. This caused replication to skip parts of the changelog, and consequently some changes were not replicated. This bug has been fixed, and replication data loss due to an incorrectly reloaded changelog buffer no longer occurs. (BZ#1354331) * Previously, if internal modifications were generated on a consumer (for example by the Account Policy plug-in) and additional changes to the same attributes were received from replication, a bug caused Directory Server to accumulate state information on the consumer. The bug has been fixed by making sure that replace operations are only applied if they are newer than existing attribute deletion change sequence numbers (CSNs), and state information no longer accumulates in this situation. (BZ#1379599) Enhancement(s) : * In a multi-master replication environment where multiple masters receive updates at the same time, it was previously possible for a single master to obtain exclusive access to a replica and hold it for a very long time due to problems such as a slow network connection. During this time, other masters were blocked from accessing the same replica, which considerably slowed down the replication process. This update adds a new configuration attribute, 'nsds5ReplicaReleaseTimeout', which can be used to specify a timeout in seconds. After the specified timeout period passes, the master releases the replica, allowing other masters to access it and send their updates. (BZ#1358390)
    last seen 2018-01-26
    modified 2018-01-25
    plugin id 94910
    published 2016-11-16
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=94910
    title RHEL 6 : 389-ds-base (RHSA-2016:2765)
  • NASL family Scientific Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id SL_20161115_389_DS_BASE_ON_SL6_X.NASL
    description Security Fix(es) : - It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a flaw in which the default ACI (Access Control Instructions) could be read by an anonymous user. This could lead to leakage of sensitive information. (CVE-2016-5416) - An information disclosure flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. A user with no access to objects in certain LDAP sub-tree could send LDAP ADD operations with a specific object name. The error message returned to the user was different based on whether the target object existed or not. (CVE-2016-4992) - It was found that 389 Directory Server was vulnerable to a remote password disclosure via timing attack. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to retrieve directory server password after many tries. (CVE-2016-5405) Bug Fix(es) : - Previously, a bug in the changelog iterator buffer caused it to point to an incorrect position when reloading the buffer. This caused replication to skip parts of the changelog, and consequently some changes were not replicated. This bug has been fixed, and replication data loss due to an incorrectly reloaded changelog buffer no longer occurs. - Previously, if internal modifications were generated on a consumer (for example by the Account Policy plug-in) and additional changes to the same attributes were received from replication, a bug caused Directory Server to accumulate state information on the consumer. The bug has been fixed by making sure that replace operations are only applied if they are newer than existing attribute deletion change sequence numbers (CSNs), and state information no longer accumulates in this situation. Enhancement(s) : - In a multi-master replication environment where multiple masters receive updates at the same time, it was previously possible for a single master to obtain exclusive access to a replica and hold it for a very long time due to problems such as a slow network connection. During this time, other masters were blocked from accessing the same replica, which considerably slowed down the replication process. This update adds a new configuration attribute, 'nsds5ReplicaReleaseTimeout', which can be used to specify a timeout in seconds. After the specified timeout period passes, the master releases the replica, allowing other masters to access it and send their updates.
    last seen 2018-01-27
    modified 2018-01-26
    plugin id 95049
    published 2016-11-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=95049
    title Scientific Linux Security Update : 389-ds-base on SL6.x i386/x86_64
redhat via4
advisories
  • bugzilla
    id 1371284
    title Disabling CLEAR password storage scheme will crash server when setting a password
    oval
    AND
    • OR
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Client is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20140675001
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20140675002
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Workstation is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20140675003
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 ComputeNode is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20140675004
    • OR
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base is earlier than 0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162594007
        • comment 389-ds-base is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20120813006
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base-devel is earlier than 0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162594005
        • comment 389-ds-base-devel is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20120813008
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base-libs is earlier than 0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162594011
        • comment 389-ds-base-libs is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20120813010
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base-snmp is earlier than 0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162594009
        • comment 389-ds-base-snmp is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162594010
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base-tests is earlier than 0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162594013
        • comment 389-ds-base-tests is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162594014
    rhsa
    id RHSA-2016:2594
    released 2016-11-03
    severity Moderate
    title RHSA-2016:2594: 389-ds-base security, bug fix, and enhancement update (Moderate)
  • bugzilla
    id 1381153
    title Crash in import_wait_for_space_in_fifo().
    oval
    AND
    • OR
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Client is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842001
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842002
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Workstation is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842003
      • comment Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 ComputeNode is installed
        oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20100842004
    • OR
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base is earlier than 0:1.2.11.15-84.el6_8
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162765005
        • comment 389-ds-base is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20120813006
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base-devel is earlier than 0:1.2.11.15-84.el6_8
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162765009
        • comment 389-ds-base-devel is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20120813008
      • AND
        • comment 389-ds-base-libs is earlier than 0:1.2.11.15-84.el6_8
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20162765007
        • comment 389-ds-base-libs is signed with Red Hat redhatrelease2 key
          oval oval:com.redhat.rhsa:tst:20120813010
    rhsa
    id RHSA-2016:2765
    released 2016-11-15
    severity Moderate
    title RHSA-2016:2765: 389-ds-base security, bug fix, and enhancement update (Moderate)
rpms
  • 389-ds-base-0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
  • 389-ds-base-devel-0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
  • 389-ds-base-libs-0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
  • 389-ds-base-snmp-0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
  • 389-ds-base-tests-0:1.3.5.10-11.el7
  • 389-ds-base-0:1.2.11.15-84.el6_8
  • 389-ds-base-devel-0:1.2.11.15-84.el6_8
  • 389-ds-base-libs-0:1.2.11.15-84.el6_8
refmap via4
bid 99097
confirm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349540
Last major update 08-06-2017 - 15:29
Published 08-06-2017 - 15:29
Last modified 19-06-2017 - 21:29
Back to Top