||The Safemode gem before 1.2.4 for Ruby, when initialized with a delegate object that is a Rails controller, allows context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information via the inspect method.
|Base: ||6.8 (as of 27-05-2016 - 14:57)|
Subverting Environment Variable Values
The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client.
An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client.
There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
|NASL family||Red Hat Local Security Checks |
|NASL id||REDHAT-RHSA-2018-0336.NASL |
|description||An update is now available for Red Hat Satellite.
Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
Red Hat Satellite is a systems management tool for Linux-based infrastructure. It allows for provisioning, remote management, and monitoring of multiple Linux deployments with a single centralized tool.
This update provides Satellite 6.3 packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Satellite server. For the full list of new features provided by Satellite 6.3, see the Release Notes linked to in the references section. See the Satellite 6 Installation Guide for detailed instructions on how to install a new Satellite 6.3 environment, or the Satellite 6 Upgrading and Updating guide for detailed instructions on how to upgrade from prior versions of Satellite 6.
All users who require Satellite version 6.3 are advised to install these new packages.
Security Fix(es) :
* V8: integer overflow leading to buffer overflow in Zone::New (CVE-2016-1669)
* rubygem-will_paginate: XSS vulnerabilities (CVE-2013-6459)
* foreman: models with a 'belongs_to' association to an Organization do not verify association belongs to that Organization (CVE-2014-8183)
* foreman: inspect in a provisioning template exposes sensitive controller information (CVE-2016-3693)
* pulp: Unsafe use of bash $RANDOM for NSS DB password and seed (CVE-2016-3704)
* foreman: privilege escalation through Organization and Locations API (CVE-2016-4451)
* foreman: inside discovery-debug, the root password is displayed in plaintext (CVE-2016-4996)
* foreman: Persistent XSS in Foreman remote execution plugin (CVE-2016-6319)
* foreman: Stored XSS via organization/location with HTML in name (CVE-2016-8639)
* katello-debug: Possible symlink attacks due to use of predictable file names (CVE-2016-9595)
* rubygem-hammer_cli: no verification of API server's SSL certificate (CVE-2017-2667)
* foreman: Image password leak (CVE-2017-2672)
* pulp: Leakage of CA key in pulp-qpid-ssl-cfg (CVE-2016-3696)
* foreman: Information disclosure in provisioning template previews (CVE-2016-4995)
* foreman-debug: missing obfuscation of sensitive information (CVE-2016-9593)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
Red Hat would like to thank Randy Barlow (RedHat) for reporting CVE-2016-3704 and Sander Bos for reporting CVE-2016-3696. The CVE-2014-8183 issue was discovered by Eric Helms (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-3693 and CVE-2016-4995 issues were discovered by Dominic Cleal (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4451 and CVE-2016-6319 issues were discovered by Marek Hulan (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-4996 issue was discovered by Thom Carlin (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-8639 issue was discovered by Sanket Jagtap (Red Hat); the CVE-2016-9595 issue was discovered by Evgeni Golov (Red Hat); the CVE-2017-2667 issue was discovered by Tomas Strachota (Red Hat); and the CVE-2016-9593 issue was discovered by Pavel Moravec (Red Hat). |
|last seen||2019-02-21 |
|plugin id||107053 |
|title||RHEL 7 : Satellite Server (RHSA-2018:0336) |
|Last major update
||31-05-2016 - 10:38
||20-05-2016 - 10:59
||22-02-2018 - 21:29