ID CVE-2016-0213
Summary Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 5.5 and 6.1.x through 6.1.11.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0212 and CVE-2016-0216.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.11.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.11.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.11.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.11.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.11
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.11
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.9.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.9.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.10.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.10.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.10.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.10.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.10
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.10
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.9.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.9.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.9
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.9
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.8.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.8.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.8.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.8.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.8
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.8
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.7.2
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.7.2
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.7.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.7.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Fastback 6.1.7.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.7.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.7
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.7
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.6.2
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.6.2
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.6.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.6.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.6.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.6.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.6
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.6
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.5.2
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.5.2
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.5.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.5.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.5
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.5
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.4.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.4.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.4
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.4
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) Fastback 6.1.3.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.3.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.3
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.3
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.2.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.2.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.2
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.2
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.1.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.1.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.0.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.0.1
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.0.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.0.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 6.1.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:6.1.0
  • IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) FastBack 5.5.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:tivoli_storage_manager_fastback:5.5.0
CVSS
Base: 10.0 (as of 03-03-2016 - 14:29)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-119
CAPEC
  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Overflow Buffers
    Buffer Overflow attacks target improper or missing bounds checking on buffer operations, typically triggered by input injected by an attacker. As a consequence, an attacker is able to write past the boundaries of allocated buffer regions in memory, causing a program crash or potentially redirection of execution as per the attackers' choice.
  • Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
    This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service.
  • Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
    In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
  • MIME Conversion
    An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
  • Overflow Binary Resource File
    An attack of this type exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in the handling of binary resources. Binary resources may include music files like MP3, image files like JPEG files, and any other binary file. These attacks may pass unnoticed to the client machine through normal usage of files, such as a browser loading a seemingly innocent JPEG file. This can allow the attacker access to the execution stack and execute arbitrary code in the target process. This attack pattern is a variant of standard buffer overflow attacks using an unexpected vector (binary files) to wrap its attack and open up a new attack vector. The attacker is required to either directly serve the binary content to the victim, or place it in a locale like a MP3 sharing application, for the victim to download. The attacker then is notified upon the download or otherwise locates the vulnerability opened up by the buffer overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
    This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An attacker can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
  • Overflow Variables and Tags
    This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The attacker crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
    In this attack, the target software is given input that the attacker knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow in an API Call
    This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An attacker who has access to an API may try to embed malicious code in the API function call and exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability in the function's implementation. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
  • Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
    This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An attacker can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
COMPLETE COMPLETE COMPLETE
nessus via4
  • NASL family General
    NASL id IBM_TSM_FASTBACK_SERVER_6_1_12.NASL
    description The version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack running on the remote host is 6.1.x prior to 6.1.12. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1331. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1923) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1329. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1924) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1332. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause an overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1925) - A buffer overflow condition exists in the FXCLI_OraBR_Exec_Command() function due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1929) - A buffer overflow condition exists in the JOB_S_GetJobByUserFriendlyString() function due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1930) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1331. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to execute arbitrary commands with a system call. (CVE-2015-1938) - An unspecified flaw exists that occurs during the handling of opcode 1329. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to gain access to arbitrary files. (CVE-2015-1941) - An unspecified flaw exists that occurs during the handling of opcode 1332. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to write or execute arbitrary files. (CVE-2015-1942) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling opcode 1364. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1948) - An unspecified flaw exists that is triggered during the handling of opcode 1330. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via specially crafted packet, to execute arbitrary commands with a system call. (CVE-2015-1949) - A format string flaw exists in the vsprintf() function due to improper sanitization of user-supplied format string specifiers when processing opcode 1335. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1953) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1954) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1962) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1963) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1964) - An overflow condition exists due to improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1965) - A format string flaw exists in the vsprintf() function due to improper sanitization of user-supplied format string specifiers when processing opcode 1301. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue, via a specially crafted packet, to cause a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1986) - Multiple stack-based buffer overflow conditions exist due to improper bounds checking. A remote attacker can exploit these, via a crafted packet, to crash the server or execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. (CVE-2016-0212, CVE-2016-0213, CVE-2016-0216)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-12
    plugin id 84585
    published 2015-07-07
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=84585
    title IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1.x < 6.1.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities
  • NASL family General
    NASL id IBM_TSM_FASTBACK_SERVER_5_5.NASL
    description The version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack running on the remote host is 5.5.x. It is, therefore, affected by multiple stack-based buffer overflow conditions due to improper bounds checking. A remote attacker can exploit these, via a crafted packet, to crash the server or execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-12
    plugin id 89691
    published 2016-03-04
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=89691
    title IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 5.5.x Multiple Vulnerabilities
refmap via4
confirm
Last major update 03-03-2016 - 14:34
Published 29-02-2016 - 06:59
Back to Top