ID CVE-2015-5231
Summary The service daemon in CRIU does not properly restrict access to non-dumpable processes, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via (1) process dumps or (2) ptrace access.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • cpe:2.3:a:criu:checkpoint%2frestore_in_userspace
    cpe:2.3:a:criu:checkpoint%2frestore_in_userspace
  • OpenSUSE 13.2
    cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse:13.2
CVSS
Base: 2.1 (as of 29-06-2016 - 17:34)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-200
CAPEC
  • Subverting Environment Variable Values
    The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
  • Footprinting
    An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • Browser Fingerprinting
    An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
  • Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
    This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
  • Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
    This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
LOCAL LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
PARTIAL NONE NONE
nessus via4
  • NASL family Fedora Local Security Checks
    NASL id FEDORA_2016-E722FE8B4D.NASL
    description Update to 2.0 Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-10-18
    plugin id 90230
    published 2016-03-28
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=90230
    title Fedora 24 : criu-2.0-1.fc24 (2016-e722fe8b4d)
  • NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks
    NASL id OPENSUSE-2015-599.NASL
    description The systemd service in criu was disabled as a temporary workaround for possibile security issues (CVE-2015-5228, CVE-2015-5231, bsc#943105)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-10-13
    plugin id 86092
    published 2015-09-23
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=86092
    title openSUSE Security Update : criu (openSUSE-2015-599)
refmap via4
confirm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256728
mlist
  • [CRIU] 20150825 Hardening the criu service daemon
  • [oss-security] 20150825 CVE-2015-5228 & CVE-2015-5231 in the criu service daemon
suse openSUSE-SU-2015:1593
Last major update 30-06-2016 - 09:06
Published 07-06-2016 - 10:06
Last modified 30-10-2018 - 12:27
Back to Top