ID CVE-2015-1932
Summary IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.x before 7.0.0.39, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.11, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.7 and WebSphere Virtual Enterprise before 7.0.0.7 allow remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information about the proxy-server software by reading the HTTP Via header.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • IBM WebSphere Virtual Enterprise 7.0.0.6
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_virtual_enterprise:7.0.0.6
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.1
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.10 (Fix Pack 10)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.10
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.11 (Fix Pack 11)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.11
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.12
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.12
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.13 (Fix Pack 13)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.13
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.14 (Fix Pack 14)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.14
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.15 (Fix Pack 15)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.15
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.16 (Fix Pack 16)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.16
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.17 (Fix Pack 17)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.17
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.18 (Fix Pack 18)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.18
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.19 (Fix Pack 19)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.19
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.2
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.2
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.21
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.21
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.22
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.22
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.23
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.23
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.24
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.24
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.25 (Fix Pack 25)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.25
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.27 (Fix Pack 27)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.27
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.29 (Fix Pack 29)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.29
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.3
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.3
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.31 (Fix Pack 31)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.31
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.32
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.32
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.33
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.33
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.34
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.34
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.36
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.36
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.37
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.37
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.38
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.38
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.4
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.4
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.5
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.5
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.6
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.6
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.7
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.7
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.8
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.8
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0.0.9 (Fix Pack 9)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:7.0.0.9
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.0
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.1
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.10 (Fix Pack 10)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.10
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.2 (Fix Pack 2)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.2
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.3 (Fix Pack 3)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.3
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.4 (Fix Pack 4)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.4
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.5 (FixPack 5)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.5
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.6 (Fix Pack 6)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.6
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.7 (Fix Pack 7)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.7
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.8 (Fix Pack 8)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.8
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.0.0.9
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.0.0.9
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.0.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.0.0
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.0.1 (Fix Pack 1)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.0.1
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.0.2 (Fix Pack 2)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.0.2
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.0
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.5.0
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.1
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.5.1
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.2
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.5.2
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.33 (Fix Pack 3)
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.5.3
  • IBM Websphere Application Server 8.5.5.4
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.5.4
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.5
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.5.5
  • IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.6
    cpe:2.3:a:ibm:websphere_application_server:8.5.5.6
CVSS
Base: 5.0 (as of 24-08-2015 - 09:18)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-200
CAPEC
  • Subverting Environment Variable Values
    The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
  • Footprinting
    An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • Browser Fingerprinting
    An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
  • Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
    This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
  • Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
    This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
PARTIAL NONE NONE
nessus via4
  • NASL family Web Servers
    NASL id WEBSPHERE_8_5_5_6.NASL
    description The IBM WebSphere Application Server running on the remote host is version 7.0 prior to 7.0.0.39, 8.0 prior to 8.0.0.11, or 8.5 prior to 8.5.5.6. It is, therefore, potentially affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - A security feature bypass vulnerability, known as FREAK (Factoring attack on RSA-EXPORT Keys), exists in the IBM Global Security Kit (GSKit) due to the support of weak EXPORT_RSA cipher suites with keys less than or equal to 512 bits. A man-in-the-middle attacker may be able to downgrade the SSL/TLS connection to use EXPORT_RSA cipher suites which can be factored in a short amount of time, allowing the attacker to intercept and decrypt the traffic. (CVE-2015-0138) - An information disclosure vulnerability exists due to a flaw in the Bleichenbacher countermeasure implementation in Apache WSS4J. A remote attacker can exploit this, via a crafted message, to determine where an encryption failure to place, allowing the attacker to gain access to the plaintext symmetric key. (CVE-2015-0226) - An XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists due to an incorrectly configured XML parser that accepts XML external entities from an untrusted source. A remote attacker can exploit this, via specially crafted XML data, to gain access to arbitrary files. (CVE-2015-0250) - A privilege escalation vulnerability exists due to a flaw that occurs in 'full' profile and 'liberty' profile when using an OAuth grant password. A remote attacker can exploit this to gain elevated privileges. (CVE-2015-1885) - A privilege escalation vulnerability exists due to incorrect settings in the serveServletsbyClassname functionality. A remote attacker can exploit this to gain elevated privileges. (CVE-2015-1927) - An information disclosure vulnerability exists that allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to identify the proxy server software by reading the HTTP 'Via' header. (CVE-2015-1932) - An unspecified flaw exists in the administrative console that allows a remote attacker, via the 'JSESSIONID' parameter, to hijack a user's session. (CVE-2015-1936) - A privilege escalation vulnerability exists due to an unspecified flaw that occurs when handling user roles. A local attacker can exploit this to gain elevated privileges. (CVE-2015-1946) - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists, known as Bar Mitzvah, due to improper combination of state data with key data by the RC4 cipher algorithm during the initialization phase. A man-in-the-middle attacker can exploit this, via a brute-force attack using LSB values, to decrypt the traffic. (CVE-2015-2808) - An unspecified flaw exists that allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to spoof servlets or disclose sensitive information. (CVE-2015-4938)
    last seen 2019-01-16
    modified 2018-08-06
    plugin id 84639
    published 2015-07-09
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=84639
    title IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0 < 7.0.0.39 (FP39) / 8.0 < 8.0.0.11 (FP11) / 8.5 < 8.5.5.6 (FP6) Multiple Vulnerabilities (Bar Mitzvah) (FREAK)
  • NASL family Web Servers
    NASL id WEBSPHERE_8_5_5_7.NASL
    description The IBM HTTP Server running on the remote host is version 6.1 prior to or equal to 6.1.0.47, 7.0 prior to 7.0.0.39, 8.0 prior to 8.0.0.12, or 8.5 prior to 8.5.5.7. It is, therefore, potentially affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - An overflow condition exists in the XML_GetBuffer() function in xmlparse.c due to improper validation of user-supplied input when handling compressed XML content. An attacker can exploit this to cause a buffer overflow, resulting in the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-1283) - A denial of service vulnerability exists when processing an ECParameters structure due to an infinite loop that occurs when a specified curve is over a malformed binary polynomial field. A remote attacker can exploit this to perform a denial of service against any system that processes public keys, certificate requests, or certificates. This includes TLS clients and TLS servers with client authentication enabled. (CVE-2015-1788) - An information disclosure vulnerability exists that allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to identify the proxy server software by reading the HTTP 'Via' header. (CVE-2015-1932) - A flaw exists in the chunked transfer coding implementation due to a failure to properly parse chunk headers. A remote attacker can exploit this to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks. (CVE-2015-3183) - An unspecified flaw exists that allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to spoof servlets or disclose sensitive information. (CVE-2015-4938) - An overflow condition exists in the Administration Server due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to cause a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in a denial of service condition or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2015-4947) Note that : - CVE-2015-1788 does not affect the 6.1 and 7.0 branches. - CVE-2015-1932 and CVE-2015-4938 do not affect the 6.1 branch.
    last seen 2019-01-16
    modified 2018-08-06
    plugin id 86018
    published 2015-09-18
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=86018
    title IBM HTTP Server 6.1 <= 6.1.0.47 (FP47) / 7.0 < 7.0.0.39 (FP39) / 8.0 < 8.0.0.12 (FP12) / 8.5 < 8.5.5.7 (FP7) Multiple Vulnerabilities
refmap via4
aixapar PI38403
bid 76466
confirm http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21963275
sectrack 1033325
Last major update 28-11-2016 - 14:19
Published 22-08-2015 - 19:59
Last modified 19-09-2017 - 21:29
Back to Top