ID CVE-2014-0659
Summary The Cisco WAP4410N access point with firmware through 2.0.6.1, WRVS4400N router with firmware 1.x through 1.1.13 and 2.x through 2.0.2.1, and RVS4000 router with firmware through 2.0.3.2 allow remote attackers to read credential and configuration data, and execute arbitrary commands, via requests to the test interface on TCP port 32764, aka Bug IDs CSCum37566, CSCum43693, CSCum43700, and CSCum43685.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • Cisco RVS4000 Firmware 2.0.3.2
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:rvs4000_firmware:2.0.3.2
  • Cisco RVS4000 Firmware 1.3.3.5
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:rvs4000_firmware:1.3.3.5
  • Cisco RVS4000 Firmware 1.3.2.0
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:rvs4000_firmware:1.3.2.0
  • Cisco RVS4000 Firmware 2.0.2.7
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:rvs4000_firmware:2.0.2.7
  • Cisco RVS4000 Firmware 2.0.0.3
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:rvs4000_firmware:2.0.0.3
  • Cisco RVS4000 4-port Gigabit Security Router
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:rvs4000
  • Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware 1.1.13
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wrvs4400n_firmware:1.1.13
  • Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware 1.1.03
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wrvs4400n_firmware:1.1.03
  • Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware 2.0.2.1
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wrvs4400n_firmware:2.0.2.1
  • Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware 2.0.1.3
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wrvs4400n_firmware:2.0.1.3
  • Cisco WRVS4400N Gigabit Security Router
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:wrvs4400n
  • Cisco WAP4410N wireless access point firmware 2.0.6.1
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wap4410n_firmware:2.0.6.1
  • Cisco WAP4410N wireless access point firmware 2.0.4.2
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wap4410n_firmware:2.0.4.2
  • Cisco WAP4410N wireless access point firmware 2.0.3.3
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wap4410n_firmware:2.0.3.3
  • Cisco WAP4410N wireless access point firmware 2.0.2.1
    cpe:2.3:o:cisco:wap4410n_firmware:2.0.2.1
  • Cisco WAP4410N wireless access point
    cpe:2.3:h:cisco:wap4410n
CVSS
Base: 10.0 (as of 01-11-2016 - 12:15)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-78
CAPEC
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Command Delimiters
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or a blacklist input validation, as opposed to whitelist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or blacklist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
    An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
  • Argument Injection
    An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
  • OS Command Injection
    In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
COMPLETE COMPLETE COMPLETE
exploit-db via4
description SerComm Device - Remote Code Execution. CVE-2014-0659. Remote exploit for hardware platform
id EDB-ID:30915
last seen 2016-02-03
modified 2014-01-14
published 2014-01-14
reporter metasploit
source https://www.exploit-db.com/download/30915/
title SerComm Device - Remote Code Execution
metasploit via4
description This module can identify SerComm manufactured network devices which contain a backdoor, allowing command injection or account disclosure.
id MSF:AUXILIARY/SCANNER/MISC/SERCOMM_BACKDOOR_SCANNER
last seen 2019-03-24
modified 2017-07-24
published 2014-01-09
reliability Normal
reporter Rapid7
source https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/modules/auxiliary/scanner/misc/sercomm_backdoor_scanner.rb
title SerComm Network Device Backdoor Detection
nessus via4
NASL family Backdoors
NASL id SCMM_BACKDOOR.NASL
description The remote device is a DSL Modem/Router with a backdoor running on port 32764. It is possible for an attacker to run arbitrary commands or access configuration details (including passwords) on the device.
last seen 2019-02-21
modified 2018-11-28
plugin id 71807
published 2014-01-06
reporter Tenable
source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=71807
title ScMM DSL Modem/Router Backdoor Detection
refmap via4
bid 64776
cisco 20140110 Undocumented Test Interface in Cisco Small Business Devices
confirm http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=32381
misc https://github.com/elvanderb/TCP-32764
sectrack
  • 1029579
  • 1029580
secunia 56292
xf cisco-small-cve20140659-priv-esc(90233)
the hacker news via4
id THN:A76AC8864F7D2E7750E33ED0D4B5F38B
last seen 2018-01-27
modified 2014-01-14
published 2014-01-13
reporter Sudhir K Bansal
source https://thehackernews.com/2014/01/cisco-released-security-advisory-for.html
title Cisco released Security advisory for critical Router password reset vulnerability
Last major update 01-11-2016 - 13:15
Published 12-01-2014 - 13:34
Last modified 28-08-2017 - 21:34
Back to Top