ID CVE-2013-4112
Summary The DiagnosticsHandler in JGroup 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.x before 3.2.9, and 3.3.x before 3.3.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (diagnostic information) and execute arbitrary code by reusing valid credentials.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.0
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.0
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.1
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.1
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.2
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.2
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.3
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.3
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.4
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.4
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.5
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.5
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.6
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.6
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.7
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.7
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.8
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.8
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.9
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.9
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.10
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.10
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.11
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.11
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.12
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.12
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.13
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.13
  • JGroups JGroup 3.0.14
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.0.14
  • JGroups JGroup 3.1.0
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.1.0
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.0
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.0
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.1
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.1
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.2
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.2
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.3
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.3
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.4
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.4
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.5
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.5
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.6
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.6
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.7
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.7
  • JGroups JGroup 3.2.8
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.2.8
  • JGroups JGroup 3.3.0
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.3.0
  • JGroups JGroup 3.3.1
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.3.1
  • JGroups JGroup 3.3.2
    cpe:2.3:a:jgroups:jgroup:3.3.2
  • Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.1.0
    cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6.1.0
CVSS
Base: 5.4 (as of 30-09-2013 - 05:18)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-200
CAPEC
  • Subverting Environment Variable Values
    The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
  • Footprinting
    An attacker engages in probing and exploration activity to identify constituents and properties of the target. Footprinting is a general term to describe a variety of information gathering techniques, often used by attackers in preparation for some attack. It consists of using tools to learn as much as possible about the composition, configuration, and security mechanisms of the targeted application, system or network. Information that might be collected during a footprinting effort could include open ports, applications and their versions, network topology, and similar information. While footprinting is not intended to be damaging (although certain activities, such as network scans, can sometimes cause disruptions to vulnerable applications inadvertently) it may often pave the way for more damaging attacks.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • Browser Fingerprinting
    An attacker carefully crafts small snippets of Java Script to efficiently detect the type of browser the potential victim is using. Many web-based attacks need prior knowledge of the web browser including the version of browser to ensure successful exploitation of a vulnerability. Having this knowledge allows an attacker to target the victim with attacks that specifically exploit known or zero day weaknesses in the type and version of the browser used by the victim. Automating this process via Java Script as a part of the same delivery system used to exploit the browser is considered more efficient as the attacker can supply a browser fingerprinting method and integrate it with exploit code, all contained in Java Script and in response to the same web page request by the browser.
  • Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
    This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
  • Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
    This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
ADJACENT_NETWORK MEDIUM NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
nessus via4
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2013-1437.NASL
    description The version of JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform on the remote system is affected by the following issues: - A flaw in CSRF prevention filter in JBoss Web could allow remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism via a request that lacks a session identifier. (CVE-2012-4431) - A flaw that occurs when the COOKIE session tracking method is used can allow attackers to hijack users' sessions. (CVE-2012-4529) - A flaw that occurs when multiple applications use the same custom authorization module class name can allow a local attacker to deploy a malicious application that overrides the custom authorization modules provided by other applications. (CVE-2012-4572) - The framework does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting. This can allow remote attackers to force the system to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications. (CVE-2012-5575) - A flaw in PicketBox can allow local users to obtain the admin encryption key by reading the Vault data file. (CVE-2013-1921) - A session fixation flaw was found in the FormAuthenticator module. (CVE-2013-2067) - A flaw that occurs when a JGroups channel was started results in the JGroups diagnostics service being enabled by default with no authentication via IP multicast. A remote attacker can make use of this flaw to read diagnostics information. (CVE-2013-2102) - A flaw in the StAX parser implementation can allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted XML. (CVE-2013-2160) - A flaw in Apache Santuario XML Security can allow context-dependent attackers to spoof an XML Signature by using the CanonicalizationMethod parameter to specify an arbitrary weak algorithm. (CVE-2013-2172) - A flaw in JGroup's DiagnosticsHandler can allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code by re-using valid credentials. (CVE-2013-4112) - A flaw in the manner in which authenticated connections were cached on the server by remote-naming can allow remote attackers to hijack sessions by using a remoting client. (CVE-2013-4128) - A flaw in the manner in which connections for EJB invocations were cached on the server can allow remote attackers to hijack sessions by using an EJB client. (CVE-2013-4213)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-26
    plugin id 72237
    published 2014-01-31
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=72237
    title JBoss Portal 6.1.0 Update (RHSA-2013:1437)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2013-1208.NASL
    description Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.1, which fixes multiple security issues, various bugs, and adds enhancements, is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 is a platform for Java applications based on JBoss Application Server 7. This release serves as a replacement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0, and includes bug fixes and enhancements. Refer to the 6.1.1 Release Notes for information on the most significant of these changes, available shortly from https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/ Security fixes : Cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws were found in the mod_info, mod_status, mod_imagemap, mod_ldap, and mod_proxy_ftp modules. An attacker could possibly use these flaws to perform XSS attacks if they were able to make the victim's browser generate an HTTP request with a specially crafted Host header. (CVE-2012-3499) Cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws were found in the mod_proxy_balancer module's manager web interface. If a remote attacker could trick a user, who was logged into the manager web interface, into visiting a specially crafted URL, it would lead to arbitrary web script execution in the context of the user's manager interface session. (CVE-2012-4558) A flaw was found in the way the mod_dav module handled merge requests. An attacker could use this flaw to send a crafted merge request that contains URIs that are not configured for DAV, causing the httpd child process to crash. (CVE-2013-1896) A flaw was found in the way Apache Santuario XML Security for Java validated XML signatures. Santuario allowed a signature to specify an arbitrary canonicalization algorithm, which would be applied to the SignedInfo XML fragment. A remote attacker could exploit this to spoof an XML signature via a specially crafted XML signature block. (CVE-2013-2172) It was found that mod_rewrite did not filter terminal escape sequences from its log file. If mod_rewrite was configured with the RewriteLog directive, a remote attacker could use specially crafted HTTP requests to inject terminal escape sequences into the mod_rewrite log file. If a victim viewed the log file with a terminal emulator, it could result in arbitrary command execution with the privileges of that user. (CVE-2013-1862) The data file used by PicketBox Vault to store encrypted passwords contains a copy of its own admin key. The file is encrypted using only this admin key, not the corresponding JKS key. A local attacker with permission to read the vault data file could read the admin key from the file, and use it to decrypt the file and read the stored passwords in clear text. (CVE-2013-1921) A flaw was found in JGroup's DiagnosticsHandler that allowed an attacker on an adjacent network to reuse the credentials from a previous successful authentication. This could be exploited to read diagnostic information (information disclosure) and attain limited remote code execution. (CVE-2013-4112) Warning: Before applying this update, back up your existing Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation and deployed applications. Refer to the Solution section for further details. All users of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 are advised to upgrade to these updated packages. The JBoss server process must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-26
    plugin id 69883
    published 2013-09-13
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=69883
    title RHEL 6 : JBoss EAP (RHSA-2013:1208)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2013-1207.NASL
    description Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.1, which fixes multiple security issues, various bugs, and adds enhancements, is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having moderate security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 is a platform for Java applications based on JBoss Application Server 7. This release serves as a replacement for Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0, and includes bug fixes and enhancements. Refer to the 6.1.1 Release Notes for information on the most significant of these changes, available shortly from https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/ Security fixes : Cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws were found in the mod_info, mod_status, mod_imagemap, mod_ldap, and mod_proxy_ftp modules. An attacker could possibly use these flaws to perform XSS attacks if they were able to make the victim's browser generate an HTTP request with a specially crafted Host header. (CVE-2012-3499) Cross-site scripting (XSS) flaws were found in the mod_proxy_balancer module's manager web interface. If a remote attacker could trick a user, who was logged into the manager web interface, into visiting a specially crafted URL, it would lead to arbitrary web script execution in the context of the user's manager interface session. (CVE-2012-4558) A flaw was found in the way the mod_dav module handled merge requests. An attacker could use this flaw to send a crafted merge request that contains URIs that are not configured for DAV, causing the httpd child process to crash. (CVE-2013-1896) A flaw was found in the way Apache Santuario XML Security for Java validated XML signatures. Santuario allowed a signature to specify an arbitrary canonicalization algorithm, which would be applied to the SignedInfo XML fragment. A remote attacker could exploit this to spoof an XML signature via a specially crafted XML signature block. (CVE-2013-2172) It was found that mod_rewrite did not filter terminal escape sequences from its log file. If mod_rewrite was configured with the RewriteLog directive, a remote attacker could use specially crafted HTTP requests to inject terminal escape sequences into the mod_rewrite log file. If a victim viewed the log file with a terminal emulator, it could result in arbitrary command execution with the privileges of that user. (CVE-2013-1862) The data file used by PicketBox Vault to store encrypted passwords contains a copy of its own admin key. The file is encrypted using only this admin key, not the corresponding JKS key. A local attacker with permission to read the vault data file could read the admin key from the file, and use it to decrypt the file and read the stored passwords in clear text. (CVE-2013-1921) A flaw was found in JGroup's DiagnosticsHandler that allowed an attacker on an adjacent network to reuse the credentials from a previous successful authentication. This could be exploited to read diagnostic information (information disclosure) and attain limited remote code execution. (CVE-2013-4112) Warning: Before applying this update, back up your existing Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installation and deployed applications. Refer to the Solution section for further details. All users of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 are advised to upgrade to these updated packages. The JBoss server process must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-26
    plugin id 69882
    published 2013-09-13
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=69882
    title RHEL 5 : JBoss EAP (RHSA-2013:1207)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2013-1209.NASL
    description The version of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform installed on the remote system is affected by the following issues : - Flaws in the mod_info, mod_status, mod_imagemap, mod_ldap, and mod_proxy_ftp modules can allow an attacker to perform cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. (CVE-2012-3499) - Flaws in the web interface of the mod_proxy_balancer module can allow a remote attacker to perform XSS attacks. (CVE-2012-4558) - A flaw in mod_rewrite can allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via an HTTP request containing an escape sequence for a terminal emulator. (CVE-2013-1862) - A flaw in the method by which the mod_dav module handles merge requests can allow an attacker to create a denial of service by sending a crafted merge request that contains URIs that are not configured for DAV. (CVE-2013-1896) - A flaw in PicketBox can allow local users to obtain the admin encryption key by reading the Vault data file. (CVE-2013-1921) - A flaw in Apache Santuario XML Security can allow context-dependent attackers to spoof an XML Signature by using the CanonicalizationMethod parameter to specify an arbitrary weak algorithm. (CVE-2013-2172) - A flaw in JGroup's DiagnosticsHandler can allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code by re-using valid credentials. (CVE-2013-4112)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-26
    plugin id 72238
    published 2014-01-31
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=72238
    title JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.1.1 Update (RHSA-2013:1209)
redhat via4
advisories
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2013:1207
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2013:1208
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2013:1209
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2013:1437
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2013:1771
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2014:0029
refmap via4
confirm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983489
Last major update 08-03-2014 - 00:09
Published 28-09-2013 - 15:55
Back to Top