ID CVE-2011-5035
Summary Oracle Glassfish 2.1.1, 3.0.1, and 3.1.1, as used in Communications Server 2.0, Sun Java System Application Server 8.1 and 8.2, and possibly other products, computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters, aka Oracle security ticket S0104869.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • Oracle GlassFish Enterprise Server 2.1.1
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:glassfish_server:2.1.1
  • Oracle GlassFish Server 3.0.1
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:glassfish_server:3.0.1
  • Oracle GlassFish Server 3.1.1
    cpe:2.3:a:oracle:glassfish_server:3.1.1
CVSS
Base: 5.0 (as of 30-12-2011 - 16:09)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-20
CAPEC
  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Object Relational Mapping Injection
    An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject his or her own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
  • SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering
    An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
  • Subverting Environment Variable Values
    The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
  • Format String Injection
    An attacker includes formatting characters in a string input field on the target application. Most applications assume that users will provide static text and may respond unpredictably to the presence of formatting character. For example, in certain functions of the C programming languages such as printf, the formatting character %s will print the contents of a memory location expecting this location to identify a string and the formatting character %n prints the number of DWORD written in the memory. An attacker can use this to read or write to memory locations or files, or simply to manipulate the value of the resulting text in unexpected ways. Reading or writing memory may result in program crashes and writing memory could result in the execution of arbitrary code if the attacker can write to the program stack.
  • LDAP Injection
    An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
  • Relative Path Traversal
    An attacker exploits a weakness in input validation on the target by supplying a specially constructed path utilizing dot and slash characters for the purpose of obtaining access to arbitrary files or resources. An attacker modifies a known path on the target in order to reach material that is not available through intended channels. These attacks normally involve adding additional path separators (/ or \) and/or dots (.), or encodings thereof, in various combinations in order to reach parent directories or entirely separate trees of the target's directory structure.
  • Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
    This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service.
  • Variable Manipulation
    An attacker manipulates variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. This can either be performed through the manipulation of function call parameters or by manipulating external variables, such as environment variables, that are used by an application. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Embedding Scripts in Non-Script Elements
    This attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where malicious scripts are embedded in elements that are not expected to host scripts such as image tags (<img>), comments in XML documents (< !-CDATA->), etc. These tags may not be subject to the same input validation, output validation, and other content filtering and checking routines, so this can create an opportunity for an attacker to tunnel through the application's elements and launch a XSS attack through other elements. As with all remote attacks, it is important to differentiate the ability to launch an attack (such as probing an internal network for unpatched servers) and the ability of the remote attacker to collect and interpret the output of said attack.
  • Flash Injection
    An attacker tricks a victim to execute malicious flash content that executes commands or makes flash calls specified by the attacker. One example of this attack is cross-site flashing, an attacker controlled parameter to a reference call loads from content specified by the attacker.
  • Cross-Site Scripting Using Alternate Syntax
    The attacker uses alternate forms of keywords or commands that result in the same action as the primary form but which may not be caught by filters. For example, many keywords are processed in a case insensitive manner. If the site's web filtering algorithm does not convert all tags into a consistent case before the comparison with forbidden keywords it is possible to bypass filters (e.g., incomplete black lists) by using an alternate case structure. For example, the "script" tag using the alternate forms of "Script" or "ScRiPt" may bypass filters where "script" is the only form tested. Other variants using different syntax representations are also possible as well as using pollution meta-characters or entities that are eventually ignored by the rendering engine. The attack can result in the execution of otherwise prohibited functionality.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • XML Nested Payloads
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. By nesting XML data and causing this data to be continuously self-referential, an attacker can cause the XML parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In most cases this type of an attack will result in a denial of service due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crash. However it may be possible to cause a crash resulting in arbitrary code execution, leading to a jump from the data plane to the control plane [R.230.1].
  • XML Oversized Payloads
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. By supplying oversized payloads in input vectors that will be processed by the XML parser, an attacker can cause the XML parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization, and potentially cause execution of arbitrary code. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a denial of service due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crash. However it is possible to cause a crash resulting in arbitrary code execution, leading to a jump from the data plane to the control plane [R.231.1].
  • Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
    In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
  • Cross-Site Scripting via Encoded URI Schemes
    An attack of this type exploits the ability of most browsers to interpret "data", "javascript" or other URI schemes as client-side executable content placeholders. This attack consists of passing a malicious URI in an anchor tag HREF attribute or any other similar attributes in other HTML tags. Such malicious URI contains, for example, a base64 encoded HTML content with an embedded cross-site scripting payload. The attack is executed when the browser interprets the malicious content i.e., for example, when the victim clicks on the malicious link.
  • XML Injection
    An attacker utilizes crafted XML user-controllable input to probe, attack, and inject data into the XML database, using techniques similar to SQL injection. The user-controllable input can allow for unauthorized viewing of data, bypassing authentication or the front-end application for direct XML database access, and possibly altering database information.
  • Environment Variable Manipulation
    An attacker manipulates environment variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Global variable manipulation
    An attacker manipulates global variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Leverage Alternate Encoding
    This attack leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input and submit it to applications not expecting or effective at validating this encoding standard making input filtering difficult.
  • Fuzzing
    Fuzzing is a software testing method that feeds randomly constructed input to the system and looks for an indication that a failure in response to that input has occurred. Fuzzing treats the system as a black box and is totally free from any preconceptions or assumptions about the system. An attacker can leverage fuzzing to try to identify weaknesses in the system. For instance fuzzing can help an attacker discover certain assumptions made in the system about user input. Fuzzing gives an attacker a quick way of potentially uncovering some of these assumptions without really knowing anything about the internals of the system. These assumptions can then be turned against the system by specially crafting user input that may allow an attacker to achieve his goals.
  • Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters
    An attacker intentionally introduces leading characters that enable getting the input past the filters. The API that is being targeted, ignores the leading "ghost" characters, and therefore processes the attackers' input. This occurs when the targeted API will accept input data in several syntactic forms and interpret it in the equivalent semantic way, while the filter does not take into account the full spectrum of the syntactic forms acceptable to the targeted API. Some APIs will strip certain leading characters from a string of parameters. Perhaps these characters are considered redundant, and for this reason they are removed. Another possibility is the parser logic at the beginning of analysis is specialized in some way that causes some characters to be removed. The attacker can specify multiple types of alternative encodings at the beginning of a string as a set of probes. One commonly used possibility involves adding ghost characters--extra characters that don't affect the validity of the request at the API layer. If the attacker has access to the API libraries being targeted, certain attack ideas can be tested directly in advance. Once alternative ghost encodings emerge through testing, the attacker can move from lab-based API testing to testing real-world service implementations.
  • Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
    This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form of this attack involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the attacker to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the attacker before it is sent back to the server. Here the attacker seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.
  • Embedding Scripts in HTTP Query Strings
    A variant of cross-site scripting called "reflected" cross-site scripting, the HTTP Query Strings attack consists of passing a malicious script inside an otherwise valid HTTP request query string. This is of significant concern for sites that rely on dynamic, user-generated content such as bulletin boards, news sites, blogs, and web enabled administration GUIs. The malicious script may steal session data, browse history, probe files, or otherwise execute attacks on the client side. Once the attacker has prepared the malicious HTTP query it is sent to a victim user (perhaps by email, IM, or posted on an online forum), who clicks on a normal looking link that contains a poison query string. This technique can be made more effective through the use of services like http://tinyurl.com/, which makes very small URLs that will redirect to very large, complex ones. The victim will not know what he is really clicking on.
  • MIME Conversion
    An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
    An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
  • Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
    This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An attacker can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
  • Overflow Variables and Tags
    This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The attacker crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
    In this attack, the target software is given input that the attacker knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
  • Signature Spoof
    An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
  • XML Client-Side Attack
    Client applications such as web browsers that process HTML data often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. These adverse effects may include the parser crashing, consuming too much of a resource, executing too slowly, executing code supplied by an attacker, allowing usage of unintended system functionality, etc. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In some cases it may be possible to jump from the data plane to the control plane via bad data being passed to an XML parser. [R.484.1]
  • Embedding NULL Bytes
    An attacker embeds one or more null bytes in input to the target software. This attack relies on the usage of a null-valued byte as a string terminator in many environments. The goal is for certain components of the target software to stop processing the input when it encounters the null byte(s).
  • Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash
    If a string is passed through a filter of some kind, then a terminal NULL may not be valid. Using alternate representation of NULL allows an attacker to embed the NULL mid-string while postfixing the proper data so that the filter is avoided. One example is a filter that looks for a trailing slash character. If a string insertion is possible, but the slash must exist, an alternate encoding of NULL in mid-string may be used.
  • Simple Script Injection
    An attacker embeds malicious scripts in content that will be served to web browsers. The goal of the attack is for the target software, the client-side browser, to execute the script with the users' privilege level. An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute code and scripts. Web browsers, for example, have some simple security controls in place, but if a remote attacker is allowed to execute scripts (through injecting them in to user-generated content like bulletin boards) then these controls may be bypassed. Further, these attacks are very difficult for an end user to detect.
  • Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic
    This attack targets the encoding of the URL combined with the encoding of the slash characters. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple way of encoding an URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. An URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc.
  • SQL Injection
    This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input. When specially crafted user-controlled input consisting of SQL syntax is used without proper validation as part of SQL queries, it is possible to glean information from the database in ways not envisaged during application design. Depending upon the database and the design of the application, it may also be possible to leverage injection to have the database execute system-related commands of the attackers' choice. SQL Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. In order to successfully inject SQL and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
  • String Format Overflow in syslog()
    This attack targets the format string vulnerabilities in the syslog() function. An attacker would typically inject malicious input in the format string parameter of the syslog function. This is a common problem, and many public vulnerabilities and associated exploits have been posted.
  • Blind SQL Injection
    Blind SQL Injection results from an insufficient mitigation for SQL Injection. Although suppressing database error messages are considered best practice, the suppression alone is not sufficient to prevent SQL Injection. Blind SQL Injection is a form of SQL Injection that overcomes the lack of error messages. Without the error messages that facilitate SQL Injection, the attacker constructs input strings that probe the target through simple Boolean SQL expressions. The attacker can determine if the syntax and structure of the injection was successful based on whether the query was executed or not. Applied iteratively, the attacker determines how and where the target is vulnerable to SQL Injection. For example, an attacker may try entering something like "username' AND 1=1; --" in an input field. If the result is the same as when the attacker entered "username" in the field, then the attacker knows that the application is vulnerable to SQL Injection. The attacker can then ask yes/no questions from the database server to extract information from it. For example, the attacker can extract table names from a database using the following types of queries: If the above query executes properly, then the attacker knows that the first character in a table name in the database is a letter between m and z. If it doesn't, then the attacker knows that the character must be between a and l (assuming of course that table names only contain alphabetic characters). By performing a binary search on all character positions, the attacker can determine all table names in the database. Subsequently, the attacker may execute an actual attack and send something like:
  • Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
    An attacker may provide a Unicode string to a system component that is not Unicode aware and use that to circumvent the filter or cause the classifying mechanism to fail to properly understanding the request. That may allow the attacker to slip malicious data past the content filter and/or possibly cause the application to route the request incorrectly.
  • URL Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the URL. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple way of encoding an URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. An URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc. The attacker could also subvert the meaning of the URL string request by encoding the data being sent to the server through a GET request. For instance an attacker may subvert the meaning of parameters used in a SQL request and sent through the URL string (See Example section).
  • User-Controlled Filename
    An attack of this type involves an attacker inserting malicious characters (such as a XSS redirection) into a filename, directly or indirectly that is then used by the target software to generate HTML text or other potentially executable content. Many websites rely on user-generated content and dynamically build resources like files, filenames, and URL links directly from user supplied data. In this attack pattern, the attacker uploads code that can execute in the client browser and/or redirect the client browser to a site that the attacker owns. All XSS attack payload variants can be used to pass and exploit these vulnerabilities.
  • Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the use of the backslash in alternate encoding. An attacker can provide a backslash as a leading character and causes a parser to believe that the next character is special. This is called an escape. By using that trick, the attacker tries to exploit alternate ways to encode the same character which leads to filter problems and opens avenues to attack.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
  • Buffer Overflow in an API Call
    This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An attacker who has access to an API may try to embed malicious code in the API function call and exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability in the function's implementation. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
  • Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
    This attack is a specific variation on leveraging alternate encodings to bypass validation logic. This attack leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input in UTF-8 and submit it to applications not expecting or effective at validating this encoding standard making input filtering difficult. UTF-8 (8-bit UCS/Unicode Transformation Format) is a variable-length character encoding for Unicode. Legal UTF-8 characters are one to four bytes long. However, early version of the UTF-8 specification got some entries wrong (in some cases it permitted overlong characters). UTF-8 encoders are supposed to use the "shortest possible" encoding, but naive decoders may accept encodings that are longer than necessary. According to the RFC 3629, a particularly subtle form of this attack can be carried out against a parser which performs security-critical validity checks against the UTF-8 encoded form of its input, but interprets certain illegal octet sequences as characters.
  • Web Logs Tampering
    Web Logs Tampering attacks involve an attacker injecting, deleting or otherwise tampering with the contents of web logs typically for the purposes of masking other malicious behavior. Additionally, writing malicious data to log files may target jobs, filters, reports, and other agents that process the logs in an asynchronous attack pattern. This pattern of attack is similar to "Log Injection-Tampering-Forging" except that in this case, the attack is targeting the logs of the web server and not the application.
  • XPath Injection
    An attacker can craft special user-controllable input consisting of XPath expressions to inject the XML database and bypass authentication or glean information that he normally would not be able to. XPath Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the XML database, thus bypassing the application completely. XPath Injection results from the failure of an application to properly sanitize input used as part of dynamic XPath expressions used to query an XML database. In order to successfully inject XML and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
  • AJAX Fingerprinting
    This attack utilizes the frequent client-server roundtrips in Ajax conversation to scan a system. While Ajax does not open up new vulnerabilities per se, it does optimize them from an attacker point of view. In many XSS attacks the attacker must get a "hole in one" and successfully exploit the vulnerability on the victim side the first time, once the client is redirected the attacker has many chances to engage in follow on probes, but there is only one first chance. In a widely used web application this is not a major problem because 1 in a 1,000 is good enough in a widely used application. A common first step for an attacker is to footprint the environment to understand what attacks will work. Since footprinting relies on enumeration, the conversational pattern of rapid, multiple requests and responses that are typical in Ajax applications enable an attacker to look for many vulnerabilities, well-known ports, network locations and so on.
  • Embedding Script (XSS) in HTTP Headers
    An attack of this type exploits web applications that generate web content, such as links in a HTML page, based on unvalidated or improperly validated data submitted by other actors. XSS in HTTP Headers attacks target the HTTP headers which are hidden from most users and may not be validated by web applications.
  • OS Command Injection
    In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.
  • Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
    This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An attacker can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.
  • XSS in IMG Tags
    Image tags are an often overlooked, but convenient, means for a Cross Site Scripting attack. The attacker can inject script contents into an image (IMG) tag in order to steal information from a victim's browser and execute malicious scripts.
  • XML Parser Attack
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. These adverse effects may include the parser crashing, consuming too much of a resource, executing too slowly, executing code supplied by an attacker, allowing usage of unintended system functionality, etc. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In some cases it may be possible to jump from the data plane to the control plane via bad data being passed to an XML parser. [R.99.1]
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
NONE NONE PARTIAL
exploit-db via4
description MyBulletinBoard (MyBB). CVE-2006-3775,CVE-2011-4084,CVE-2011-4858,CVE-2011-4885,CVE-2011-5034,CVE-2011-5035. Webapps exploit for php platform
id EDB-ID:2012
last seen 2016-01-31
modified 2006-07-15
published 2006-07-15
reporter rgod
source https://www.exploit-db.com/download/2012/
title MyBulletinBoard MyBB <= 1.1.5 - CLIENT-IP SQL Injection Exploit
metasploit via4
description This module uses a denial-of-service (DoS) condition appearing in a variety of programming languages. This vulnerability occurs when storing multiple values in a hash table and all values have the same hash value. This can cause a web server parsing the POST parameters issued with a request into a hash table to consume hours of CPU with a single HTTP request. Currently, only the hash functions for PHP and Java are implemented. This module was tested with PHP + httpd, Tomcat, Glassfish and Geronimo. It also generates a random payload to bypass some IDS signatures.
id MSF:AUXILIARY/DOS/HTTP/HASHCOLLISION_DOS
last seen 2019-03-09
modified 2017-07-24
published 2012-05-13
reliability Normal
reporter Rapid7
source https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/modules/auxiliary/dos/http/hashcollision_dos.rb
title Hashtable Collisions
nessus via4
  • NASL family Windows
    NASL id ORACLE_JROCKIT_CPU_APR_2012.NASL
    description The remote host has a version of Oracle JRockit that is affected by multiple vulnerabilities that could allow a remote attacker to compromise system confidentiality and integrity via unspecified vectors.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-15
    plugin id 76683
    published 2014-07-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=76683
    title Oracle JRockit R27 < R27.7.2.5 / R28 < R28.2.3.13 Multiple Vulnerabilities (April 2012 CPU)
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS9_X86_124673.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-12-12
    plugin id 27099
    published 2007-10-17
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=27099
    title Solaris 9 (x86) : 124673-20
  • NASL family Gentoo Local Security Checks
    NASL id GENTOO_GLSA-201401-30.NASL
    description The remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-201401-30 (Oracle JRE/JDK: Multiple vulnerabilities) Multiple vulnerabilities have been reported in the Oracle Java implementation. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact : An unauthenticated, remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code. Furthermore, a local or remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities to cause unspecified impact, possibly including remote execution of arbitrary code. Workaround : There is no known workaround at this time.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-01-03
    plugin id 72139
    published 2014-01-27
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=72139
    title GLSA-201401-30 : Oracle JRE/JDK: Multiple vulnerabilities (ROBOT)
  • NASL family Windows
    NASL id ORACLE_JAVA_CPU_FEB_2012.NASL
    description The version of Oracle (formerly Sun) Java SE or Java for Business installed on the remote host is earlier than 7 Update 3 / 6 Update 31 / 5.0 Update 34 / 1.4.2_36 and is, therefore, potentially affected by security issues in the following components : - 2D - AWT - CORBA - Concurrency - Deployment - I18n - Install - Java Runtime Environment - Lightweight HTTP Server - Serialization - Sound
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-15
    plugin id 57959
    published 2012-02-15
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=57959
    title Oracle Java SE Multiple Vulnerabilities (February 2012 CPU)
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS9_X86_128641.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-12-09
    plugin id 35421
    published 2009-01-19
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=35421
    title Solaris 9 (x86) : 128641-30
  • NASL family Misc.
    NASL id ORACLE_JAVA_CPU_FEB_2012_UNIX.NASL
    description The version of Oracle (formerly Sun) Java SE or Java for Business installed on the remote host is earlier than 7 Update 3 / 6 Update 31 / 5.0 Update 34 / 1.4.2_36 and is, therefore, potentially affected by security issues in the following components : - 2D - AWT - CORBA - Concurrency - Deployment - I18n - Install - Java Runtime Environment - Lightweight HTTP Server - Serialization - Sound
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-15
    plugin id 64847
    published 2013-02-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=64847
    title Oracle Java SE Multiple Vulnerabilities (February 2012 CPU) (Unix)
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_X86_128641-30.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-10-29
    plugin id 107968
    published 2018-03-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=107968
    title Solaris 10 (x86) : 128641-30
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS9_128640.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-12-09
    plugin id 35419
    published 2009-01-19
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=35419
    title Solaris 9 (sparc) : 128640-30
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_X86_128641.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server. This plugin has been deprecated and either replaced with individual 128641 patch-revision plugins, or deemed non-security related.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-30
    plugin id 35415
    published 2009-01-19
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=35415
    title Solaris 10 (x86) : 128641-30 (deprecated)
  • NASL family Web Servers
    NASL id GLASSFISH_CVE-2011-5035.NASL
    description The version of GlassFish Server running on the remote host is affected by a denial of service vulnerability which can be triggered by specially crafted requests containing parameter values that cause hash collisions when computing the hash values for storage in a hash table.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-12
    plugin id 58090
    published 2012-02-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58090
    title Oracle GlassFish Server 2.1.1 < 2.1.1.15 / 3.0.1 < 3.0.1.5 / 3.1.1 < 3.1.1.2 Hash Collision DoS
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2013-1455.NASL
    description Updated java-1.6.0-ibm packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Network Satellite Server 5.4. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having low security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. This update corrects several security vulnerabilities in the IBM Java Runtime Environment shipped as part of Red Hat Network Satellite Server 5.4. In a typical operating environment, these are of low security risk as the runtime is not used on untrusted applets. Several flaws were fixed in the IBM Java 2 Runtime Environment. (CVE-2011-0802, CVE-2011-0814, CVE-2011-0862, CVE-2011-0863, CVE-2011-0865, CVE-2011-0867, CVE-2011-0868, CVE-2011-0869, CVE-2011-0871, CVE-2011-0873, CVE-2011-3389, CVE-2011-3516, CVE-2011-3521, CVE-2011-3544, CVE-2011-3545, CVE-2011-3546, CVE-2011-3547, CVE-2011-3548, CVE-2011-3549, CVE-2011-3550, CVE-2011-3551, CVE-2011-3552, CVE-2011-3553, CVE-2011-3554, CVE-2011-3556, CVE-2011-3557, CVE-2011-3560, CVE-2011-3561, CVE-2011-3563, CVE-2011-5035, CVE-2012-0497, CVE-2012-0498, CVE-2012-0499, CVE-2012-0500, CVE-2012-0501, CVE-2012-0502, CVE-2012-0503, CVE-2012-0505, CVE-2012-0506, CVE-2012-0507, CVE-2012-0547, CVE-2012-0551, CVE-2012-1531, CVE-2012-1532, CVE-2012-1533, CVE-2012-1541, CVE-2012-1682, CVE-2012-1713, CVE-2012-1716, CVE-2012-1717, CVE-2012-1718, CVE-2012-1719, CVE-2012-1721, CVE-2012-1722, CVE-2012-1725, CVE-2012-3143, CVE-2012-3159, CVE-2012-3213, CVE-2012-3216, CVE-2012-3342, CVE-2012-4820, CVE-2012-4822, CVE-2012-4823, CVE-2012-5068, CVE-2012-5069, CVE-2012-5071, CVE-2012-5072, CVE-2012-5073, CVE-2012-5075, CVE-2012-5079, CVE-2012-5081, CVE-2012-5083, CVE-2012-5084, CVE-2012-5089, CVE-2013-0169, CVE-2013-0351, CVE-2013-0401, CVE-2013-0409, CVE-2013-0419, CVE-2013-0423, CVE-2013-0424, CVE-2013-0425, CVE-2013-0426, CVE-2013-0427, CVE-2013-0428, CVE-2013-0432, CVE-2013-0433, CVE-2013-0434, CVE-2013-0435, CVE-2013-0438, CVE-2013-0440, CVE-2013-0441, CVE-2013-0442, CVE-2013-0443, CVE-2013-0445, CVE-2013-0446, CVE-2013-0450, CVE-2013-0809, CVE-2013-1473, CVE-2013-1476, CVE-2013-1478, CVE-2013-1480, CVE-2013-1481, CVE-2013-1486, CVE-2013-1487, CVE-2013-1491, CVE-2013-1493, CVE-2013-1500, CVE-2013-1537, CVE-2013-1540, CVE-2013-1557, CVE-2013-1563, CVE-2013-1569, CVE-2013-1571, CVE-2013-2383, CVE-2013-2384, CVE-2013-2394, CVE-2013-2407, CVE-2013-2412, CVE-2013-2417, CVE-2013-2418, CVE-2013-2419, CVE-2013-2420, CVE-2013-2422, CVE-2013-2424, CVE-2013-2429, CVE-2013-2430, CVE-2013-2432, CVE-2013-2433, CVE-2013-2435, CVE-2013-2437, CVE-2013-2440, CVE-2013-2442, CVE-2013-2443, CVE-2013-2444, CVE-2013-2446, CVE-2013-2447, CVE-2013-2448, CVE-2013-2450, CVE-2013-2451, CVE-2013-2452, CVE-2013-2453, CVE-2013-2454, CVE-2013-2455, CVE-2013-2456, CVE-2013-2457, CVE-2013-2459, CVE-2013-2463, CVE-2013-2464, CVE-2013-2465, CVE-2013-2466, CVE-2013-2468, CVE-2013-2469, CVE-2013-2470, CVE-2013-2471, CVE-2013-2472, CVE-2013-2473, CVE-2013-3743) Users of Red Hat Network Satellite Server 5.4 are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which contain the IBM Java SE 6 SR14 release. For this update to take effect, Red Hat Network Satellite Server must be restarted ('/usr/sbin/rhn-satellite restart'), as well as all running instances of IBM Java.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-26
    plugin id 78975
    published 2014-11-08
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=78975
    title RHEL 5 / 6 : IBM Java Runtime in Satellite Server (RHSA-2013:1455) (BEAST) (ROBOT)
  • NASL family Gentoo Local Security Checks
    NASL id GENTOO_GLSA-201406-32.NASL
    description The remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-201406-32 (IcedTea JDK: Multiple vulnerabilities) Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in the IcedTea JDK. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact : A remote attacker could possibly execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the process, cause a Denial of Service condition, obtain sensitive information, bypass intended security policies, or have other unspecified impact. Workaround : There is no known workaround at this time.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-12
    plugin id 76303
    published 2014-06-30
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=76303
    title GLSA-201406-32 : IcedTea JDK: Multiple vulnerabilities (BEAST) (ROBOT)
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_128640-30.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-10-26
    plugin id 107469
    published 2018-03-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=107469
    title Solaris 10 (sparc) : 128640-30
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_X86_124673-20.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-10-29
    plugin id 107913
    published 2018-03-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=107913
    title Solaris 10 (x86) : 124673-20
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_X86_124673.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server. This plugin has been deprecated and either replaced with individual 124673 patch-revision plugins, or deemed non-security related.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-30
    plugin id 27077
    published 2007-10-17
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=27077
    title Solaris 10 (x86) : 124673-20 (deprecated)
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_124672.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server. This plugin has been deprecated and either replaced with individual 124672 patch-revision plugins, or deemed non-security related.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-30
    plugin id 27072
    published 2007-10-17
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=27072
    title Solaris 10 (sparc) : 124672-20 (deprecated)
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_124672-20.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-10-26
    plugin id 107410
    published 2018-03-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=107410
    title Solaris 10 (sparc) : 124672-20
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS8_124672.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-12-12
    plugin id 27509
    published 2007-10-18
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=27509
    title Solaris 8 (sparc) : 124672-20
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS9_124672.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-12-12
    plugin id 27092
    published 2007-10-17
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=27092
    title Solaris 9 (sparc) : 124672-20
  • NASL family Solaris Local Security Checks
    NASL id SOLARIS10_128640.NASL
    description Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server. This plugin has been deprecated and either replaced with individual 128640 patch-revision plugins, or deemed non-security related.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-30
    plugin id 35409
    published 2009-01-19
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=35409
    title Solaris 10 (sparc) : 128640-30 (deprecated)
  • NASL family Misc.
    NASL id VMWARE_VCENTER_VMSA-2012-0013.NASL
    description The version of VMware vCenter installed on the remote host is 4.0 earlier than Update 4a, 4.1 earlier than Update 3, or 5.0 earlier than Update 2. As such, it is potentially affected by multiple vulnerabilities in the included Oracle (Sun) Java Runtime Environment.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-08-06
    plugin id 66806
    published 2013-06-05
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=66806
    title VMware vCenter Multiple Vulnerabilities (VMSA-2012-0013)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2012-0139.NASL
    description Updated java-1.6.0-sun packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Extras, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6 Supplementary. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having critical security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. The Sun 1.6.0 Java release includes the Sun Java 6 Runtime Environment and the Sun Java 6 Software Development Kit. This update fixes several vulnerabilities in the Sun Java 6 Runtime Environment and the Sun Java 6 Software Development Kit. Further information about these flaws can be found on the Oracle Java SE Critical Patch page, listed in the References section. (CVE-2011-3563, CVE-2011-3571, CVE-2011-5035, CVE-2012-0498, CVE-2012-0499, CVE-2012-0500, CVE-2012-0501, CVE-2012-0502, CVE-2012-0503, CVE-2012-0505, CVE-2012-0506) All users of java-1.6.0-sun are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which provide JDK and JRE 6 Update 31 and resolve these issues. All running instances of Sun Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-26
    plugin id 57991
    published 2012-02-17
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=57991
    title RHEL 4 / 5 / 6 : java-1.6.0-sun (RHSA-2012:0139)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1373-2.NASL
    description USN 1373-1 fixed vulnerabilities in OpenJDK 6 in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04 for all architectures except for ARM (armel). This provides the corresponding OpenJDK 6 update for use with the ARM (armel) architecture in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, Ubuntu 10.10 and Ubuntu 11.04. It was discovered that the Java HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from a HTTP request. A remote attacker could cause a denial of service by sending special requests that trigger hash collisions predictably. (CVE-2011-5035) ATTENTION: this update changes previous Java HttpServer class behavior by limiting the number of request headers to 200. This may be increased by adjusting the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. It was discovered that the Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or view confidential data. (CVE-2011-3563) It was discovered that the Java2D implementation does not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that an off-by-one error exists in the Java ZIP file processing code. An attacker could us this to cause a denial of service through a maliciously crafted ZIP file. (CVE-2012-0501) It was discovered that the Java AWT KeyboardFocusManager did not properly enforce keyboard focus security policy. A remote attacker could use this with an untrusted application or applet to grab keyboard focus and possibly expose confidential data. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the Java TimeZone class did not properly enforce security policy around setting the default time zone. A remote attacker could use this with an untrusted application or applet to set a new default time zone and bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) It was discovered the Java ObjectStreamClass did not throw an accurately identifiable exception when a deserialization failure occurred. A remote attacker could use this with an untrusted application or applet to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) It was discovered that the Java CORBA implementation did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. A remote attacker could use this to corrupt object data. (CVE-2012-0506) It was discovered that the Java AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if an array was of the expected Object[] type. A remote attacker could use this with a malicious application or applet to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0507). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 58179
    published 2012-03-01
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58179
    title Ubuntu 10.04 LTS / 10.10 / 11.04 : openjdk-6b18 vulnerabilities (USN-1373-2)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2012-0514.NASL
    description Updated java-1.6.0-ibm packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6 Supplementary. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having critical security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. The IBM Java SE version 6 release includes the IBM Java 6 Runtime Environment and the IBM Java 6 Software Development Kit. This update fixes several vulnerabilities in the IBM Java 6 Runtime Environment and the IBM Java 6 Software Development Kit. Detailed vulnerability descriptions are linked from the IBM 'Security alerts' page, listed in the References section. (CVE-2011-3563, CVE-2011-5035, CVE-2012-0497, CVE-2012-0498, CVE-2012-0499, CVE-2012-0500, CVE-2012-0501, CVE-2012-0502, CVE-2012-0503, CVE-2012-0505, CVE-2012-0506, CVE-2012-0507) All users of java-1.6.0-ibm are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, containing the IBM Java 6 SR10-FP1 release. All running instances of IBM Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-20
    plugin id 58866
    published 2012-04-25
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58866
    title RHEL 5 / 6 : java-1.6.0-ibm (RHSA-2012:0514)
  • NASL family Scientific Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id SL_20120214_JAVA_1_6_0_OPENJDK_ON_SL6_X.NASL
    description These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) Note: If the web browser plug-in provided by the icedtea-web package was installed, the issues exposed via Java applets could have been exploited without user interaction if a user visited a malicious website. This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-31
    plugin id 61248
    published 2012-08-01
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=61248
    title Scientific Linux Security Update : java-1.6.0-openjdk on SL6.x i386/x86_64
  • NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks
    NASL id SUSE_11_JAVA-1_6_0-OPENJDK-120220.NASL
    description java-1_6_0-openjdk was updated to the IcedTea 1.11.1 b24 release, fixing multiple security issues : - S7082299, CVE-2011-3571: Fix inAtomicReferenceArray - S7088367, CVE-2011-3563: Fix issues in java sound - S7110683, CVE-2012-0502: Issues with some KeyboardFocusManager method - S7110687, CVE-2012-0503: Issues with TimeZone class - S7110700, CVE-2012-0505: Enhance exception throwing mechanism in ObjectStreamClass - S7110704, CVE-2012-0506: Issues with some method in corba - S7112642, CVE-2012-0497: Incorrect checking for graphics rendering object - S7118283, CVE-2012-0501: Better input parameter checking in zip file processing - S7126960, CVE-2011-5035: (httpserver) Add property to limit number of request headers to the HTTP Server
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-06-29
    plugin id 58141
    published 2012-02-28
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58141
    title SuSE 11.1 Security Update : Java 1.6.0 (SAT Patch Number 5845)
  • NASL family Debian Local Security Checks
    NASL id DEBIAN_DSA-2420.NASL
    description Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenJDK, an implementation of the Oracle Java platform. - CVE-2011-3377 The IcedTea browser plugin included in the openjdk-6 package does not properly enforce the Same Origin Policy on web content served under a domain name which has a common suffix with the required domain name. - CVE-2011-3563 The Java Sound component did not properly check for array boundaries. A malicious input or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause Java Virtual Machine to crash or disclose portion of its memory. - CVE-2011-5035 The OpenJDK embedded web server did not guard against an excessive number of a request parameters, leading to a denial of service vulnerability involving hash collisions. - CVE-2012-0497 It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. This could lead to JVM crash or Java sandbox bypass. - CVE-2012-0501 The ZIP central directory parser used by java.util.zip.ZipFile entered an infinite recursion in native code when processing a crafted ZIP file, leading to a denial of service. - CVE-2012-0502 A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager class that could allow untrusted Java applets to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. - CVE-2012-0503 The java.util.TimeZone.setDefault() method lacked a security manager invocation, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone. - CVE-2012-0505 The Java serialization code leaked references to serialization exceptions, possibly leaking critical objects to untrusted code in Java applets and applications. - CVE-2012-0506 It was discovered that CORBA implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers (that can be obtained using _ids() method) on certain Corba objects. This could have been used to perform modification of the data that should have been immutable. - CVE-2012-0507 The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array is of an expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause Java Virtual Machine to crash or bypass Java sandbox restrictions.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-10
    plugin id 58148
    published 2012-02-29
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58148
    title Debian DSA-2420-1 : openjdk-6 - several vulnerabilities
  • NASL family Scientific Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id SL_20120216_JAVA_1_6_0_SUN_ON_SL4_X.NASL
    description This update fixes several vulnerabilities in the Sun Java 6 Runtime Environment and the Sun Java 6 Software Development Kit. Further information about these flaws can be found on the Oracle Java SE Critical Patch page. (CVE-2011-3563, CVE-2011-3571, CVE-2011-5035, CVE-2012-0498, CVE-2012-0499, CVE-2012-0500, CVE-2012-0501, CVE-2012-0502, CVE-2012-0503, CVE-2012-0505, CVE-2012-0506) All users of java-1.6.0-sun are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which provide JDK and JRE 6 Update 31 and resolve these issues. All running instances of Sun Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-31
    plugin id 61252
    published 2012-08-01
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=61252
    title Scientific Linux Security Update : java-1.6.0-sun on SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64
  • NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks
    NASL id OPENSUSE-2012-136.NASL
    description update to version 1.11.1 to fix several security issues : - S7082299, CVE-2011-3571: Fix in AtomicReferenceArray - S7088367, CVE-2011-3563: Fix issues in java sound - S7110683, CVE-2012-0502: Issues with some KeyboardFocusManager method - S7110687, CVE-2012-0503: Issues with TimeZone class - S7110700, CVE-2012-0505: Enhance exception throwing mechanism in ObjectStreamClass - S7110704, CVE-2012-0506: Issues with some method in corba - S7112642, CVE-2012-0497: Incorrect checking for graphics rendering object - S7118283, CVE-2012-0501: Better input parameter checking in zip file processing - S7126960, CVE-2011-5035: (httpserver) Add property to limit number of request headers to the HTTP Server
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-06-29
    plugin id 74558
    published 2014-06-13
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=74558
    title openSUSE Security Update : java-1_6_0-openjdk (openSUSE-2012-136)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1373-1.NASL
    description It was discovered that the Java HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from a HTTP request. A remote attacker could cause a denial of service by sending special requests that trigger hash collisions predictably. (CVE-2011-5035) ATTENTION: this update changes previous Java HttpServer class behavior by limiting the number of request headers to 200. This may be increased by adjusting the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. It was discovered that the Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or view confidential data. (CVE-2011-3563) It was discovered that the Java2D implementation does not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that an off-by-one error exists in the Java ZIP file processing code. An attacker could us this to cause a denial of service through a maliciously crafted ZIP file. (CVE-2012-0501) It was discovered that the Java AWT KeyboardFocusManager did not properly enforce keyboard focus security policy. A remote attacker could use this with an untrusted application or applet to grab keyboard focus and possibly expose confidential data. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the Java TimeZone class did not properly enforce security policy around setting the default time zone. A remote attacker could use this with an untrusted application or applet to set a new default time zone and bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) It was discovered the Java ObjectStreamClass did not throw an accurately identifiable exception when a deserialization failure occurred. A remote attacker could use this with an untrusted application or applet to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) It was discovered that the Java CORBA implementation did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. A remote attacker could use this to corrupt object data. (CVE-2012-0506) It was discovered that the Java AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if an array was of the expected Object[] type. A remote attacker could use this with a malicious application or applet to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0507). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 58130
    published 2012-02-27
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58130
    title Ubuntu 10.04 LTS / 10.10 / 11.04 / 11.10 : openjdk-6 vulnerabilities (USN-1373-1)
  • NASL family MacOS X Local Security Checks
    NASL id MACOSX_JAVA_10_6_UPDATE7.NASL
    description The remote Mac OS X host is running a version of Java for Mac OS X 10.6 that is missing Update 7, which updates the Java version to 1.6.0_31. As such, it is affected by several security vulnerabilities, the most serious of which may allow an untrusted Java applet to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the current user outside the Java sandbox.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-14
    plugin id 58605
    published 2012-04-05
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58605
    title Mac OS X : Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 7
  • NASL family Scientific Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id SL_20120221_JAVA_1_6_0_OPENJDK_ON_SL5_X.NASL
    description These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-31
    plugin id 61264
    published 2012-08-01
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=61264
    title Scientific Linux Security Update : java-1.6.0-openjdk on SL5.x i386/x86_64
  • NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks
    NASL id SUSE_11_4_JAVA-1_6_0-OPENJDK-120222.NASL
    description java-1_6_0-openjdk was updated to the b24 release, fixing multiple security issues : dbg114-java-1_6_0-openjdk-5856 java-1_6_0-openjdk-5856 new_updateinfo Security fixes - S7082299, CVE-2011-3571: Fix inAtomicReferenceArray - S7088367, CVE-2011-3563: Fix issues in java sound - S7110683, CVE-2012-0502: Issues with some KeyboardFocusManager method - S7110687, CVE-2012-0503: Issues with TimeZone class - S7110700, CVE-2012-0505: Enhance exception throwing mechanism in ObjectStreamClass - S7110704, CVE-2012-0506: Issues with some method in corba - S7112642, CVE-2012-0497: Incorrect checking for graphics rendering object - S7118283, CVE-2012-0501: Better input parameter checking in zip file processing - S7126960, CVE-2011-5035: (httpserver) Add property to limit number of request headers to the HTTP Server
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-10
    plugin id 75871
    published 2014-06-13
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=75871
    title openSUSE Security Update : java-1_6_0-openjdk (openSUSE-SU-2012:0309-1)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2012-0322.NASL
    description Updated java-1.6.0-openjdk packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. Refer to the NEWS file, linked to in the References, for further information. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-26
    plugin id 58084
    published 2012-02-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58084
    title RHEL 5 : java-1.6.0-openjdk (RHSA-2012:0322)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2012-0135.NASL
    description Updated java-1.6.0-openjdk packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having critical security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) Note: If the web browser plug-in provided by the icedtea-web package was installed, the issues exposed via Java applets could have been exploited without user interaction if a user visited a malicious website. This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. Refer to the NEWS file, linked to in the References, for further information. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-26
    plugin id 57956
    published 2012-02-15
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=57956
    title RHEL 6 : java-1.6.0-openjdk (RHSA-2012:0135)
  • NASL family Mandriva Local Security Checks
    NASL id MANDRIVA_MDVSA-2012-021.NASL
    description Multiple security issues were identified and fixed in OpenJDK (icedtea6) : Fix issues in java sound (CVE-2011-3563). Fix in AtomicReferenceArray (CVE-2011-3571). Add property to limit number of request headers to the HTTP Server (CVE-2011-5035). Incorect checking for graphics rendering object (CVE-2012-0497). Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors (CVE-2012-0498. CVE-2012-0499, CVE-2012-0500). Better input parameter checking in zip file processing (CVE-2012-0501). Issues with some KeyboardFocusManager method (CVE-2012-0502). Issues with TimeZone class (CVE-2012-0503). Enhance exception throwing mechanism in ObjectStreamClass (CVE-2012-0505). Issues with some method in corba (CVE-2012-0506). The updated packages provides icedtea6-1.10.6 which is not vulnerable to these issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2019-01-02
    plugin id 58026
    published 2012-02-20
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58026
    title Mandriva Linux Security Advisory : java-1.6.0-openjdk (MDVSA-2012:021)
  • NASL family Oracle Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ORACLELINUX_ELSA-2012-0322.NASL
    description From Red Hat Security Advisory 2012:0322 : Updated java-1.6.0-openjdk packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. Refer to the NEWS file, linked to in the References, for further information. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-05-20
    plugin id 68487
    published 2013-07-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=68487
    title Oracle Linux 5 : java-1.6.0-openjdk (ELSA-2012-0322)
  • NASL family Oracle Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ORACLELINUX_ELSA-2012-0135.NASL
    description From Red Hat Security Advisory 2012:0135 : Updated java-1.6.0-openjdk packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having critical security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) Note: If the web browser plug-in provided by the icedtea-web package was installed, the issues exposed via Java applets could have been exploited without user interaction if a user visited a malicious website. This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. Refer to the NEWS file, linked to in the References, for further information. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-18
    plugin id 68459
    published 2013-07-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=68459
    title Oracle Linux 6 : java-1.6.0-openjdk (ELSA-2012-0135)
  • NASL family CentOS Local Security Checks
    NASL id CENTOS_RHSA-2012-0135.NASL
    description Updated java-1.6.0-openjdk packages that fix several security issues are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having critical security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. These packages provide the OpenJDK 6 Java Runtime Environment and the OpenJDK 6 Software Development Kit. It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501) Note: If the web browser plug-in provided by the icedtea-web package was installed, the issues exposed via Java applets could have been exploited without user interaction if a user visited a malicious website. This erratum also upgrades the OpenJDK package to IcedTea6 1.10.6. Refer to the NEWS file, linked to in the References, for further information. All users of java-1.6.0-openjdk are advised to upgrade to these updated packages, which resolve these issues. All running instances of OpenJDK Java must be restarted for the update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-10
    plugin id 57961
    published 2012-02-16
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=57961
    title CentOS 6 : java-1.6.0-openjdk (CESA-2012:0135)
  • NASL family Amazon Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ALA_ALAS-2012-43.NASL
    description It was discovered that Java2D did not properly check graphics rendering objects before passing them to the native renderer. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to crash the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), or bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0497) It was discovered that the exception thrown on deserialization failure did not always contain a proper identification of the cause of the failure. An untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0505) The AtomicReferenceArray class implementation did not properly check if the array was of the expected Object[] type. A malicious Java application or applet could use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2011-3571) It was discovered that the use of TimeZone.setDefault() was not restricted by the SecurityManager, allowing an untrusted Java application or applet to set a new default time zone, and hence bypass Java sandbox restrictions. (CVE-2012-0503) The HttpServer class did not limit the number of headers read from HTTP requests. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make an application using HttpServer use an excessive amount of CPU time via a specially crafted request. This update introduces a header count limit controlled using the sun.net.httpserver.maxReqHeaders property. The default value is 200. (CVE-2011-5035) The Java Sound component did not properly check buffer boundaries. Malicious input, or an untrusted Java application or applet could use this flaw to cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash or disclose a portion of its memory. (CVE-2011-3563) A flaw was found in the AWT KeyboardFocusManager that could allow an untrusted Java application or applet to acquire keyboard focus and possibly steal sensitive information. (CVE-2012-0502) It was discovered that the CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) implementation in Java did not properly protect repository identifiers on certain CORBA objects. This could have been used to modify immutable object data. (CVE-2012-0506) An off-by-one flaw, causing a stack overflow, was found in the unpacker for ZIP files. A specially crafted ZIP archive could cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to crash when opened. (CVE-2012-0501)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-06-29
    plugin id 69650
    published 2013-09-04
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=69650
    title Amazon Linux AMI : java-1.6.0-openjdk (ALAS-2012-43)
  • NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks
    NASL id SUSE_11_JAVA-1_6_0-IBM-120427.NASL
    description IBM Java 1.6.0 was updated to SR10-FP1, fixing various security issues. More information can be found on : http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/alerts/
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2013-11-18
    plugin id 64164
    published 2013-01-25
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=64164
    title SuSE 11.1 Security Update : IBM Java 1.6.0 (SAT Patch Number 6225)
  • NASL family MacOS X Local Security Checks
    NASL id MACOSX_JAVA_10_7_2012-001.NASL
    description The remote Mac OS X host is running a version of Java for Mac OS X 10.7 that is missing update 2012-001, which updates the Java version to 1.6.0_31. As such, it is affected by several security vulnerabilities, the most serious of which may allow an untrusted Java applet to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the current user outside the Java sandbox.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-14
    plugin id 58606
    published 2012-04-05
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=58606
    title Mac OS X : Java for OS X Lion 2012-001
oval via4
accepted 2013-07-29T04:00:57.418-04:00
class vulnerability
contributors
name Sergey Artykhov
organization ALTX-SOFT
definition_extensions
comment Oracle WebLogic Server is installed
oval oval:org.mitre.oval:def:17114
description Oracle Glassfish 2.1.1, 3.0.1, and 3.1.1, as used in Communications Server 2.0, Sun Java System Application Server 8.1 and 8.2, and possibly other products, computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters, aka Oracle security ticket S0104869.
family windows
id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:16908
status accepted
submitted 2013-04-29T10:26:26.748+04:00
title Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Container). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.5, 10.3.6 and 12.1.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows successful unauthenticated network attacks via HTTP. Successful attack of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle WebLogic Server
version 6
redhat via4
advisories
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2012:0514
  • rhsa
    id RHSA-2013:1455
rpms
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1:1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1:1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1:1.6.0.0-1.43.1.10.6.el6_2
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1:1.6.0.0-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1:1.6.0.0-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1:1.6.0.0-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8
  • java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1:1.6.0.0-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8
refmap via4
bugtraq 20111228 n.runs-SA-2011.004 - web programming languages and platforms - DoS through hash table
cert-vn VU#903934
confirm
debian DSA-2420
gentoo GLSA-201406-32
hp
  • HPSBMU02797
  • HPSBMU02799
  • HPSBST02955
  • HPSBUX02757
  • HPSBUX02784
  • SSRT100779
  • SSRT100867
  • SSRT100871
mandriva MDVSA-2013:150
misc
secunia
  • 48073
  • 48074
  • 48589
  • 48950
  • 57126
suse SUSE-SU-2012:0603
vmware via4
description The Oracle (Sun) JRE is updated to version 1.6.0_31which addresses multiple security issues. Oracle has documented the CVE identifiers that are addressed by this update in the Oracle Java SE Critical Patch Update Advisory of February 2012.
id VMSA-2012-0013
last_updated 2012-12-20T00:00:00
published 2012-08-30T00:00:00
title vCenter and ESX update to JRE 1.6.0 Update 31
Last major update 22-08-2016 - 22:04
Published 29-12-2011 - 20:55
Last modified 05-01-2018 - 21:29
Back to Top