ID CVE-2011-1598
Summary The bcm_release function in net/can/bcm.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.39-rc6 does not properly validate a socket data structure, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted release operation.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.18.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.18.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.61
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.61
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.62
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.62
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.52
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.52
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.51
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.51
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.50
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.50
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.49
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.49
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.48
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.48
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.47
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.47
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.46
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.46
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.45
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.45
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.60
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.60
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.59
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.59
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.58
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.58
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.57
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.57
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.56
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.56
  • Linux Kernel 2.16.55
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.55
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.54
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.54
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.53
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.53
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.33
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.33
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.34
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.34
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.35
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.35
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.36
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.36
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.29
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.29
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.30
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.30
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.31
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.31
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.32
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.32
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.41
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.41
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.42
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.42
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.43
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.43
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.44
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.44
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.37
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.37
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.38
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.38
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.39
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.39
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.40
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.40
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.28
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.28
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.0
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.0
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.6
  • linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc7
  • linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.34
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.34
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.33
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.33
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.36
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.36
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.35
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.35
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.37
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.37
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 release candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.10
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.10
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.20
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.20
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.12
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.12
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.11
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.11
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.31.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.37.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.37.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.28
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.28
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.29
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.29
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.30
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.30
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.31
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.31
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.32
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.32
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.13
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.13
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.14
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.14
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.15
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.15
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.16
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.16
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.17
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.17
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.18
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.18
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.19
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.19
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.40
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.40
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.38
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.38
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.39
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.39
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.41
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.41
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.42
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.42
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.43
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.43
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.44
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.44
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.45
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.45
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.46
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.46
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.47
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.47
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.48
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.48
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.49
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.49
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.50
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.50
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.51
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.51
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.52
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.52
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.53
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.53
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.54
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.54
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.55
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.55
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.56
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.56
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.57
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.57
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.27.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.27.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.21
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.21
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.22
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.22
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.23
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.23
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.24
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.24
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.25
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.25
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.26
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.26
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.32.27
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.32.27
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35.9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35.9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.1 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.1:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.2 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.2:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.3 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.3:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.4 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.4:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.5 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.5:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.6 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.6:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.7 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.7:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.8 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.8:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.9 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.9:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.10 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.10:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.11 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.11:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.12 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.12:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.13 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.13:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.14 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.14:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.15 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.15:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.16 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.16:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.17 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.17:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.19 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.19:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.20 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.20:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.21 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.21:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.22 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.22:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.23 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.23:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.24 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.24:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.25 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.25:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.26 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.26:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.28 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.28:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.29 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.29:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.30 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.30:rc8
  • linux Kernel 2.6.31 Release Candidate 9
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.31:rc9
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.33 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.33:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.34 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.34:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.35 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.35:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 8
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc8
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc7
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.36 Release Candidate 6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.36:rc6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.39 Release Candidate 1
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.39:rc1
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.39 Release Candidate 2
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.39:rc2
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.39 Release Candidate 3
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.39:rc3
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.39 Release Candidate 4
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.39:rc4
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.39 Release Candidate 5
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.39:rc5
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.6
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.6
  • Linux Kernel 2.6.38.7
    cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6.38.7
CVSS
Base: 4.9 (as of 10-05-2011 - 13:58)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-20
CAPEC
  • Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables
    This attack pattern involves causing a buffer overflow through manipulation of environment variables. Once the attacker finds that they can modify an environment variable, they may try to overflow associated buffers. This attack leverages implicit trust often placed in environment variables.
  • Server Side Include (SSI) Injection
    An attacker can use Server Side Include (SSI) Injection to send code to a web application that then gets executed by the web server. Doing so enables the attacker to achieve similar results to Cross Site Scripting, viz., arbitrary code execution and information disclosure, albeit on a more limited scale, since the SSI directives are nowhere near as powerful as a full-fledged scripting language. Nonetheless, the attacker can conveniently gain access to sensitive files, such as password files, and execute shell commands.
  • Cross Zone Scripting
    An attacker is able to cause a victim to load content into their web-browser that bypasses security zone controls and gain access to increased privileges to execute scripting code or other web objects such as unsigned ActiveX controls or applets. This is a privilege elevation attack targeted at zone-based web-browser security. In a zone-based model, pages belong to one of a set of zones corresponding to the level of privilege assigned to that page. Pages in an untrusted zone would have a lesser level of access to the system and/or be restricted in the types of executable content it was allowed to invoke. In a cross-zone scripting attack, a page that should be assigned to a less privileged zone is granted the privileges of a more trusted zone. This can be accomplished by exploiting bugs in the browser, exploiting incorrect configuration in the zone controls, through a cross-site scripting attack that causes the attackers' content to be treated as coming from a more trusted page, or by leveraging some piece of system functionality that is accessible from both the trusted and less trusted zone. This attack differs from "Restful Privilege Escalation" in that the latter correlates to the inadequate securing of RESTful access methods (such as HTTP DELETE) on the server, while cross-zone scripting attacks the concept of security zones as implemented by a browser.
  • Cross Site Scripting through Log Files
    An attacker may leverage a system weakness where logs are susceptible to log injection to insert scripts into the system's logs. If these logs are later viewed by an administrator through a thin administrative interface and the log data is not properly HTML encoded before being written to the page, the attackers' scripts stored in the log will be executed in the administrative interface with potentially serious consequences. This attack pattern is really a combination of two other attack patterns: log injection and stored cross site scripting.
  • Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
    An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
  • Object Relational Mapping Injection
    An attacker leverages a weakness present in the database access layer code generated with an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool or a weakness in the way that a developer used a persistence framework to inject his or her own SQL commands to be executed against the underlying database. The attack here is similar to plain SQL injection, except that the application does not use JDBC to directly talk to the database, but instead it uses a data access layer generated by an ORM tool or framework (e.g. Hibernate). While most of the time code generated by an ORM tool contains safe access methods that are immune to SQL injection, sometimes either due to some weakness in the generated code or due to the fact that the developer failed to use the generated access methods properly, SQL injection is still possible.
  • SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering
    An attacker modifies the parameters of the SOAP message that is sent from the service consumer to the service provider to initiate a SQL injection attack. On the service provider side, the SOAP message is parsed and parameters are not properly validated before being used to access a database in a way that does not use parameter binding, thus enabling the attacker to control the structure of the executed SQL query. This pattern describes a SQL injection attack with the delivery mechanism being a SOAP message.
  • Subverting Environment Variable Values
    The attacker directly or indirectly modifies environment variables used by or controlling the target software. The attacker's goal is to cause the target software to deviate from its expected operation in a manner that benefits the attacker.
  • Format String Injection
    An attacker includes formatting characters in a string input field on the target application. Most applications assume that users will provide static text and may respond unpredictably to the presence of formatting character. For example, in certain functions of the C programming languages such as printf, the formatting character %s will print the contents of a memory location expecting this location to identify a string and the formatting character %n prints the number of DWORD written in the memory. An attacker can use this to read or write to memory locations or files, or simply to manipulate the value of the resulting text in unexpected ways. Reading or writing memory may result in program crashes and writing memory could result in the execution of arbitrary code if the attacker can write to the program stack.
  • LDAP Injection
    An attacker manipulates or crafts an LDAP query for the purpose of undermining the security of the target. Some applications use user input to create LDAP queries that are processed by an LDAP server. For example, a user might provide their username during authentication and the username might be inserted in an LDAP query during the authentication process. An attacker could use this input to inject additional commands into an LDAP query that could disclose sensitive information. For example, entering a * in the aforementioned query might return information about all users on the system. This attack is very similar to an SQL injection attack in that it manipulates a query to gather additional information or coerce a particular return value.
  • Relative Path Traversal
    An attacker exploits a weakness in input validation on the target by supplying a specially constructed path utilizing dot and slash characters for the purpose of obtaining access to arbitrary files or resources. An attacker modifies a known path on the target in order to reach material that is not available through intended channels. These attacks normally involve adding additional path separators (/ or \) and/or dots (.), or encodings thereof, in various combinations in order to reach parent directories or entirely separate trees of the target's directory structure.
  • Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow
    This type of attack exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in targeted client software through injection of malicious content from a custom-built hostile service.
  • Variable Manipulation
    An attacker manipulates variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. This can either be performed through the manipulation of function call parameters or by manipulating external variables, such as environment variables, that are used by an application. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Embedding Scripts in Non-Script Elements
    This attack is a form of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where malicious scripts are embedded in elements that are not expected to host scripts such as image tags (<img>), comments in XML documents (< !-CDATA->), etc. These tags may not be subject to the same input validation, output validation, and other content filtering and checking routines, so this can create an opportunity for an attacker to tunnel through the application's elements and launch a XSS attack through other elements. As with all remote attacks, it is important to differentiate the ability to launch an attack (such as probing an internal network for unpatched servers) and the ability of the remote attacker to collect and interpret the output of said attack.
  • Flash Injection
    An attacker tricks a victim to execute malicious flash content that executes commands or makes flash calls specified by the attacker. One example of this attack is cross-site flashing, an attacker controlled parameter to a reference call loads from content specified by the attacker.
  • Cross-Site Scripting Using Alternate Syntax
    The attacker uses alternate forms of keywords or commands that result in the same action as the primary form but which may not be caught by filters. For example, many keywords are processed in a case insensitive manner. If the site's web filtering algorithm does not convert all tags into a consistent case before the comparison with forbidden keywords it is possible to bypass filters (e.g., incomplete black lists) by using an alternate case structure. For example, the "script" tag using the alternate forms of "Script" or "ScRiPt" may bypass filters where "script" is the only form tested. Other variants using different syntax representations are also possible as well as using pollution meta-characters or entities that are eventually ignored by the rendering engine. The attack can result in the execution of otherwise prohibited functionality.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • XML Nested Payloads
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. By nesting XML data and causing this data to be continuously self-referential, an attacker can cause the XML parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In most cases this type of an attack will result in a denial of service due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crash. However it may be possible to cause a crash resulting in arbitrary code execution, leading to a jump from the data plane to the control plane [R.230.1].
  • XML Oversized Payloads
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. By supplying oversized payloads in input vectors that will be processed by the XML parser, an attacker can cause the XML parser to consume more resources while processing, causing excessive memory consumption and CPU utilization, and potentially cause execution of arbitrary code. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In many cases this type of an attack will result in a denial of service due to an application becoming unstable, freezing, or crash. However it is possible to cause a crash resulting in arbitrary code execution, leading to a jump from the data plane to the control plane [R.231.1].
  • Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow
    In this attack, the idea is to cause an active filter to fail by causing an oversized transaction. An attacker may try to feed overly long input strings to the program in an attempt to overwhelm the filter (by causing a buffer overflow) and hoping that the filter does not fail securely (i.e. the user input is let into the system unfiltered).
  • Cross-Site Scripting via Encoded URI Schemes
    An attack of this type exploits the ability of most browsers to interpret "data", "javascript" or other URI schemes as client-side executable content placeholders. This attack consists of passing a malicious URI in an anchor tag HREF attribute or any other similar attributes in other HTML tags. Such malicious URI contains, for example, a base64 encoded HTML content with an embedded cross-site scripting payload. The attack is executed when the browser interprets the malicious content i.e., for example, when the victim clicks on the malicious link.
  • XML Injection
    An attacker utilizes crafted XML user-controllable input to probe, attack, and inject data into the XML database, using techniques similar to SQL injection. The user-controllable input can allow for unauthorized viewing of data, bypassing authentication or the front-end application for direct XML database access, and possibly altering database information.
  • Environment Variable Manipulation
    An attacker manipulates environment variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Global variable manipulation
    An attacker manipulates global variables used by an application to perform a variety of possible attacks. Changing variable values is usually undertaken as part of another attack; for example, a path traversal (inserting relative path modifiers) or buffer overflow (enlarging a variable value beyond an application's ability to store it).
  • Leverage Alternate Encoding
    This attack leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input and submit it to applications not expecting or effective at validating this encoding standard making input filtering difficult.
  • Fuzzing
    Fuzzing is a software testing method that feeds randomly constructed input to the system and looks for an indication that a failure in response to that input has occurred. Fuzzing treats the system as a black box and is totally free from any preconceptions or assumptions about the system. An attacker can leverage fuzzing to try to identify weaknesses in the system. For instance fuzzing can help an attacker discover certain assumptions made in the system about user input. Fuzzing gives an attacker a quick way of potentially uncovering some of these assumptions without really knowing anything about the internals of the system. These assumptions can then be turned against the system by specially crafting user input that may allow an attacker to achieve his goals.
  • Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input Filters
    An attacker intentionally introduces leading characters that enable getting the input past the filters. The API that is being targeted, ignores the leading "ghost" characters, and therefore processes the attackers' input. This occurs when the targeted API will accept input data in several syntactic forms and interpret it in the equivalent semantic way, while the filter does not take into account the full spectrum of the syntactic forms acceptable to the targeted API. Some APIs will strip certain leading characters from a string of parameters. Perhaps these characters are considered redundant, and for this reason they are removed. Another possibility is the parser logic at the beginning of analysis is specialized in some way that causes some characters to be removed. The attacker can specify multiple types of alternative encodings at the beginning of a string as a set of probes. One commonly used possibility involves adding ghost characters--extra characters that don't affect the validity of the request at the API layer. If the attacker has access to the API libraries being targeted, certain attack ideas can be tested directly in advance. Once alternative ghost encodings emerge through testing, the attacker can move from lab-based API testing to testing real-world service implementations.
  • Accessing/Intercepting/Modifying HTTP Cookies
    This attack relies on the use of HTTP Cookies to store credentials, state information and other critical data on client systems. The first form of this attack involves accessing HTTP Cookies to mine for potentially sensitive data contained therein. The second form of this attack involves intercepting this data as it is transmitted from client to server. This intercepted information is then used by the attacker to impersonate the remote user/session. The third form is when the cookie's content is modified by the attacker before it is sent back to the server. Here the attacker seeks to convince the target server to operate on this falsified information.
  • Embedding Scripts in HTTP Query Strings
    A variant of cross-site scripting called "reflected" cross-site scripting, the HTTP Query Strings attack consists of passing a malicious script inside an otherwise valid HTTP request query string. This is of significant concern for sites that rely on dynamic, user-generated content such as bulletin boards, news sites, blogs, and web enabled administration GUIs. The malicious script may steal session data, browse history, probe files, or otherwise execute attacks on the client side. Once the attacker has prepared the malicious HTTP query it is sent to a victim user (perhaps by email, IM, or posted on an online forum), who clicks on a normal looking link that contains a poison query string. This technique can be made more effective through the use of services like http://tinyurl.com/, which makes very small URLs that will redirect to very large, complex ones. The victim will not know what he is really clicking on.
  • MIME Conversion
    An attacker exploits a weakness in the MIME conversion routine to cause a buffer overflow and gain control over the mail server machine. The MIME system is designed to allow various different information formats to be interpreted and sent via e-mail. Attack points exist when data are converted to MIME compatible format and back.
  • Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
    An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
  • Buffer Overflow via Symbolic Links
    This type of attack leverages the use of symbolic links to cause buffer overflows. An attacker can try to create or manipulate a symbolic link file such that its contents result in out of bounds data. When the target software processes the symbolic link file, it could potentially overflow internal buffers with insufficient bounds checking.
  • Overflow Variables and Tags
    This type of attack leverages the use of tags or variables from a formatted configuration data to cause buffer overflow. The attacker crafts a malicious HTML page or configuration file that includes oversized strings, thus causing an overflow.
  • Buffer Overflow via Parameter Expansion
    In this attack, the target software is given input that the attacker knows will be modified and expanded in size during processing. This attack relies on the target software failing to anticipate that the expanded data may exceed some internal limit, thereby creating a buffer overflow.
  • Signature Spoof
    An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
  • XML Client-Side Attack
    Client applications such as web browsers that process HTML data often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. These adverse effects may include the parser crashing, consuming too much of a resource, executing too slowly, executing code supplied by an attacker, allowing usage of unintended system functionality, etc. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In some cases it may be possible to jump from the data plane to the control plane via bad data being passed to an XML parser. [R.484.1]
  • Embedding NULL Bytes
    An attacker embeds one or more null bytes in input to the target software. This attack relies on the usage of a null-valued byte as a string terminator in many environments. The goal is for certain components of the target software to stop processing the input when it encounters the null byte(s).
  • Postfix, Null Terminate, and Backslash
    If a string is passed through a filter of some kind, then a terminal NULL may not be valid. Using alternate representation of NULL allows an attacker to embed the NULL mid-string while postfixing the proper data so that the filter is avoided. One example is a filter that looks for a trailing slash character. If a string insertion is possible, but the slash must exist, an alternate encoding of NULL in mid-string may be used.
  • Simple Script Injection
    An attacker embeds malicious scripts in content that will be served to web browsers. The goal of the attack is for the target software, the client-side browser, to execute the script with the users' privilege level. An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that are brought on by allowing remote hosts to execute code and scripts. Web browsers, for example, have some simple security controls in place, but if a remote attacker is allowed to execute scripts (through injecting them in to user-generated content like bulletin boards) then these controls may be bypassed. Further, these attacks are very difficult for an end user to detect.
  • Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic
    This attack targets the encoding of the URL combined with the encoding of the slash characters. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple way of encoding an URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. An URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc.
  • SQL Injection
    This attack exploits target software that constructs SQL statements based on user input. An attacker crafts input strings so that when the target software constructs SQL statements based on the input, the resulting SQL statement performs actions other than those the application intended. SQL Injection results from failure of the application to appropriately validate input. When specially crafted user-controlled input consisting of SQL syntax is used without proper validation as part of SQL queries, it is possible to glean information from the database in ways not envisaged during application design. Depending upon the database and the design of the application, it may also be possible to leverage injection to have the database execute system-related commands of the attackers' choice. SQL Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the database, thus bypassing the application completely. Successful injection can cause information disclosure as well as ability to add or modify data in the database. In order to successfully inject SQL and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
  • String Format Overflow in syslog()
    This attack targets the format string vulnerabilities in the syslog() function. An attacker would typically inject malicious input in the format string parameter of the syslog function. This is a common problem, and many public vulnerabilities and associated exploits have been posted.
  • Blind SQL Injection
    Blind SQL Injection results from an insufficient mitigation for SQL Injection. Although suppressing database error messages are considered best practice, the suppression alone is not sufficient to prevent SQL Injection. Blind SQL Injection is a form of SQL Injection that overcomes the lack of error messages. Without the error messages that facilitate SQL Injection, the attacker constructs input strings that probe the target through simple Boolean SQL expressions. The attacker can determine if the syntax and structure of the injection was successful based on whether the query was executed or not. Applied iteratively, the attacker determines how and where the target is vulnerable to SQL Injection. For example, an attacker may try entering something like "username' AND 1=1; --" in an input field. If the result is the same as when the attacker entered "username" in the field, then the attacker knows that the application is vulnerable to SQL Injection. The attacker can then ask yes/no questions from the database server to extract information from it. For example, the attacker can extract table names from a database using the following types of queries: If the above query executes properly, then the attacker knows that the first character in a table name in the database is a letter between m and z. If it doesn't, then the attacker knows that the character must be between a and l (assuming of course that table names only contain alphabetic characters). By performing a binary search on all character positions, the attacker can determine all table names in the database. Subsequently, the attacker may execute an actual attack and send something like:
  • Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
    An attacker may provide a Unicode string to a system component that is not Unicode aware and use that to circumvent the filter or cause the classifying mechanism to fail to properly understanding the request. That may allow the attacker to slip malicious data past the content filter and/or possibly cause the application to route the request incorrectly.
  • URL Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the URL. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple way of encoding an URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. An URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc. The attacker could also subvert the meaning of the URL string request by encoding the data being sent to the server through a GET request. For instance an attacker may subvert the meaning of parameters used in a SQL request and sent through the URL string (See Example section).
  • User-Controlled Filename
    An attack of this type involves an attacker inserting malicious characters (such as a XSS redirection) into a filename, directly or indirectly that is then used by the target software to generate HTML text or other potentially executable content. Many websites rely on user-generated content and dynamically build resources like files, filenames, and URL links directly from user supplied data. In this attack pattern, the attacker uploads code that can execute in the client browser and/or redirect the client browser to a site that the attacker owns. All XSS attack payload variants can be used to pass and exploit these vulnerabilities.
  • Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the use of the backslash in alternate encoding. An attacker can provide a backslash as a leading character and causes a parser to believe that the next character is special. This is called an escape. By using that trick, the attacker tries to exploit alternate ways to encode the same character which leads to filter problems and opens avenues to attack.
  • Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding
    This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An attacker would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the attacker many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.
  • Buffer Overflow in an API Call
    This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An attacker who has access to an API may try to embed malicious code in the API function call and exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability in the function's implementation. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.
  • Using UTF-8 Encoding to Bypass Validation Logic
    This attack is a specific variation on leveraging alternate encodings to bypass validation logic. This attack leverages the possibility to encode potentially harmful input in UTF-8 and submit it to applications not expecting or effective at validating this encoding standard making input filtering difficult. UTF-8 (8-bit UCS/Unicode Transformation Format) is a variable-length character encoding for Unicode. Legal UTF-8 characters are one to four bytes long. However, early version of the UTF-8 specification got some entries wrong (in some cases it permitted overlong characters). UTF-8 encoders are supposed to use the "shortest possible" encoding, but naive decoders may accept encodings that are longer than necessary. According to the RFC 3629, a particularly subtle form of this attack can be carried out against a parser which performs security-critical validity checks against the UTF-8 encoded form of its input, but interprets certain illegal octet sequences as characters.
  • Web Logs Tampering
    Web Logs Tampering attacks involve an attacker injecting, deleting or otherwise tampering with the contents of web logs typically for the purposes of masking other malicious behavior. Additionally, writing malicious data to log files may target jobs, filters, reports, and other agents that process the logs in an asynchronous attack pattern. This pattern of attack is similar to "Log Injection-Tampering-Forging" except that in this case, the attack is targeting the logs of the web server and not the application.
  • XPath Injection
    An attacker can craft special user-controllable input consisting of XPath expressions to inject the XML database and bypass authentication or glean information that he normally would not be able to. XPath Injection enables an attacker to talk directly to the XML database, thus bypassing the application completely. XPath Injection results from the failure of an application to properly sanitize input used as part of dynamic XPath expressions used to query an XML database. In order to successfully inject XML and retrieve information from a database, an attacker:
  • AJAX Fingerprinting
    This attack utilizes the frequent client-server roundtrips in Ajax conversation to scan a system. While Ajax does not open up new vulnerabilities per se, it does optimize them from an attacker point of view. In many XSS attacks the attacker must get a "hole in one" and successfully exploit the vulnerability on the victim side the first time, once the client is redirected the attacker has many chances to engage in follow on probes, but there is only one first chance. In a widely used web application this is not a major problem because 1 in a 1,000 is good enough in a widely used application. A common first step for an attacker is to footprint the environment to understand what attacks will work. Since footprinting relies on enumeration, the conversational pattern of rapid, multiple requests and responses that are typical in Ajax applications enable an attacker to look for many vulnerabilities, well-known ports, network locations and so on.
  • Embedding Script (XSS) in HTTP Headers
    An attack of this type exploits web applications that generate web content, such as links in a HTML page, based on unvalidated or improperly validated data submitted by other actors. XSS in HTTP Headers attacks target the HTTP headers which are hidden from most users and may not be validated by web applications.
  • OS Command Injection
    In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.
  • Buffer Overflow in Local Command-Line Utilities
    This attack targets command-line utilities available in a number of shells. An attacker can leverage a vulnerability found in a command-line utility to escalate privilege to root.
  • XSS in IMG Tags
    Image tags are an often overlooked, but convenient, means for a Cross Site Scripting attack. The attacker can inject script contents into an image (IMG) tag in order to steal information from a victim's browser and execute malicious scripts.
  • XML Parser Attack
    Applications often need to transform data in and out of the XML format by using an XML parser. It may be possible for an attacker to inject data that may have an adverse effect on the XML parser when it is being processed. These adverse effects may include the parser crashing, consuming too much of a resource, executing too slowly, executing code supplied by an attacker, allowing usage of unintended system functionality, etc. An attacker's goal is to leverage parser failure to his or her advantage. In some cases it may be possible to jump from the data plane to the control plane via bad data being passed to an XML parser. [R.99.1]
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
LOCAL LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
NONE NONE COMPLETE
nessus via4
  • NASL family Fedora Local Security Checks
    NASL id FEDORA_2011-11103.NASL
    description Update to kernel 2.6.35.14 : http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.35/ChangeLog -2.6.35.14 NOTE: These upstream commits from 2.6.35.14 were already in the previous Fedora 14 kernel 2.6.35.13-92 : b934c20de1398d4a82d2ecfeb588a214a910f13f 3cd01976e702ccaffb907727caff4f8789353599 9c047157a20521cd525527947b13b950d168d2e6 6b4e81db2552bad04100e7d5ddeed7e848f53b48 3e9d08ec0a68f6faf718d5a7e050fe5ca0ba004f b522f02184b413955f3bc952e3776ce41edc6355 194b3da873fd334ef183806db751473512af29ce a1f74ae82d133ebb2aabb19d181944b4e83e9960 e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470 14fb57dccb6e1defe9f89a66f548fcb24c374c1d 221d1d797202984cb874e3ed9f1388593d34ee22 a294865978b701e4d0d90135672749531b9a900d Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Fedora security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-07-12
    plugin id 55955
    published 2011-08-23
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55955
    title Fedora 14 : kernel-2.6.35.14-95.fc14 (2011-11103)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2011-0836.NASL
    description Updated kernel packages that fix multiple security issues and various bugs are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. This update fixes the following security issues : * An integer underflow flaw, leading to a buffer overflow, was found in the Linux kernel's Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) implementation. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770, Important) * Missing sanity checks were found in setup_arg_pages() in the Linux kernel. When making the size of the argument and environment area on the stack very large, it could trigger a BUG_ON(), resulting in a local denial of service. (CVE-2010-3858, Moderate) * A missing validation check was found in the bcm_release() and raw_release() functions in the Linux kernel's Controller Area Network (CAN) implementation. This could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748, Moderate) * The fix for Red Hat Bugzilla bug 656461, as provided in RHSA-2011:0542, introduced a regression in the cifs_close() function in the Linux kernel's Common Internet File System (CIFS) implementation. A local, unprivileged user with write access to a CIFS file system could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1771, Moderate) Red Hat would like to thank Dan Rosenberg for reporting CVE-2011-1770; Brad Spengler for reporting CVE-2010-3858; and Oliver Hartkopp for reporting CVE-2011-1748. This update also fixes various bugs. Documentation for these bug fixes will be available shortly from the Technical Notes document linked to in the References section. Users should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to resolve these issues, and fix the bugs noted in the Technical Notes. The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-20
    plugin id 54941
    published 2011-06-02
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=54941
    title RHEL 6 : kernel (RHSA-2011:0836)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1202-1.NASL
    description Dan Rosenberg discovered that several network ioctls did not clear kernel memory correctly. A local user could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-3296, CVE-2010-3297) Brad Spengler discovered that stack memory for new a process was not correctly calculated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-3858) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the Linux kernel TIPC implementation contained multiple integer signedness errors. A local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-3859) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the CAN protocol on 64bit systems did not correctly calculate the size of certain buffers. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or possibly execute arbitrary code as the root user. (CVE-2010-3874) Nelson Elhage discovered that the Linux kernel IPv4 implementation did not properly audit certain bytecodes in netlink messages. A local attacker could exploit this to cause the kernel to hang, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-3880) Dan Rosenberg discovered that IPC structures were not correctly initialized on 64bit systems. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4073) Dan Rosenberg discovered that multiple terminal ioctls did not correctly initialize structure memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4075, CVE-2010-4076, CVE-2010-4077) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the RME Hammerfall DSP audio interface driver did not correctly clear kernel memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4080, CVE-2010-4081) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the VIA video driver did not correctly clear kernel memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4082) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the semctl syscall did not correctly clear kernel memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4083) James Bottomley discovered that the ICP vortex storage array controller driver did not validate certain sizes. A local attacker on a 64bit system could exploit this to crash the kernel, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4157) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the Linux kernel L2TP implementation contained multiple integer signedness errors. A local attacker could exploit this to to crash the kernel, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4160) Dan Rosenberg discovered that certain iovec operations did not calculate page counts correctly. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4162) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the SCSI subsystem did not correctly validate iov segments. A local attacker with access to a SCSI device could send specially crafted requests to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4163, CVE-2010-4668) Dave Jones discovered that the mprotect system call did not correctly handle merged VMAs. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4169) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the RDS protocol did not correctly check ioctl arguments. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4175) Alan Cox discovered that the HCI UART driver did not correctly check if a write operation was available. If the mmap_min-addr sysctl was changed from the Ubuntu default to a value of 0, a local attacker could exploit this flaw to gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4242) Brad Spengler discovered that the kernel did not correctly account for userspace memory allocations during exec() calls. A local attacker could exploit this to consume all system memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4243) It was discovered that multithreaded exec did not handle CPU timers correctly. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4248) It was discovered that named pipes did not correctly handle certain fcntl calls. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4256) Dan Rosenburg discovered that the CAN subsystem leaked kernel addresses into the /proc filesystem. A local attacker could use this to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2010-4565) Dan Carpenter discovered that the Infiniband driver did not correctly handle certain requests. A local user could exploit this to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4649, CVE-2011-1044) Kees Cook discovered that some ethtool functions did not correctly clear heap memory. A local attacker with CAP_NET_ADMIN privileges could exploit this to read portions of kernel heap memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4655) Kees Cook discovered that the IOWarrior USB device driver did not correctly check certain size fields. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted USB device to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4656) Goldwyn Rodrigues discovered that the OCFS2 filesystem did not correctly clear memory when writing certain file holes. A local attacker could exploit this to read uninitialized data from the disk, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0463) Dan Carpenter discovered that the TTPCI DVB driver did not check certain values during an ioctl. If the dvb-ttpci module was loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-0521) Jens Kuehnel discovered that the InfiniBand driver contained a race condition. On systems using InfiniBand, a local attacker could send specially crafted requests to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-0695) Dan Rosenberg discovered that XFS did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could make crafted ioctl calls to leak portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0711) Rafael Dominguez Vega discovered that the caiaq Native Instruments USB driver did not correctly validate string lengths. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted USB device to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-0712) Kees Cook reported that /proc/pid/stat did not correctly filter certain memory locations. A local attacker could determine the memory layout of processes in an attempt to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2011-0726) Timo Warns discovered that MAC partition parsing routines did not correctly calculate block counts. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1010) Timo Warns discovered that LDM partition parsing routines did not correctly calculate block counts. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1012) Matthiew Herrb discovered that the drm modeset interface did not correctly handle a signed comparison. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1013) Marek Olsak discovered that the Radeon GPU drivers did not correctly validate certain registers. On systems with specific hardware, a local attacker could exploit this to write to arbitrary video memory. (CVE-2011-1016) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the CAP_SYS_MODULE capability was not needed to load kernel modules. A local attacker with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability could load existing kernel modules, possibly increasing the attack surface available on the system. (CVE-2011-1019) It was discovered that the /proc filesystem did not correctly handle permission changes when programs executed. A local attacker could hold open files to examine details about programs running with higher privileges, potentially increasing the chances of exploiting additional vulnerabilities. (CVE-2011-1020) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Nelson Elhage discovered that the epoll subsystem did not correctly handle certain structures. A local attacker could create malicious requests that would hang the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1082) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Johan Hovold discovered that the DCCP network stack did not correctly handle certain packet combinations. A remote attacker could send specially crafted network traffic that would crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1093) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Dan Rosenberg discovered that some ALSA drivers did not correctly check the adapter index during ioctl calls. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could make a specially crafted ioctl call to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1169) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Julien Tinnes discovered that the kernel did not correctly validate the signal structure from tkill(). A local attacker could exploit this to send signals to arbitrary threads, possibly bypassing expected restrictions. (CVE-2011-1182) Ryan Sweat discovered that the GRO code did not correctly validate memory. In some configurations on systems using VLANs, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1478) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the X.25 Rose network stack did not correctly handle certain fields. If a system was running with Rose enabled, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1493) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Vasiliy Kulikov and Dan Rosenberg discovered that ecryptfs did not correctly check the origin of mount points. A local attacker could exploit this to trick the system into unmounting arbitrary mount points, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1833) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that taskstats listeners were not correctly handled. A local attacker could expoit this to exhaust memory and CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2484) It was discovered that Bluetooth l2cap and rfcomm did not correctly initialize structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of the kernel stack, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-2492) Fernando Gont discovered that the IPv6 stack used predictable fragment identification numbers. A remote attacker could exploit this to exhaust network resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2699) The performance counter subsystem did not correctly handle certain counters. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2918)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-05-26
    plugin id 56190
    published 2011-09-14
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=56190
    title USN-1202-1 : linux-ti-omap4 vulnerabilities
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1162-1.NASL
    description Brad Spengler discovered that the kernel did not correctly account for userspace memory allocations during exec() calls. A local attacker could exploit this to consume all system memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4243) Alexander Duyck discovered that the Intel Gigabit Ethernet driver did not correctly handle certain configurations. If such a device was configured without VLANs, a remote attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4263) Nelson Elhage discovered that Econet did not correctly handle AUN packets over UDP. A local attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4342) Dan Rosenberg discovered that IRDA did not correctly check the size of buffers. On non-x86 systems, a local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4529) Dan Rosenburg discovered that the CAN subsystem leaked kernel addresses into the /proc filesystem. A local attacker could use this to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2010-4565) Goldwyn Rodrigues discovered that the OCFS2 filesystem did not correctly clear memory when writing certain file holes. A local attacker could exploit this to read uninitialized data from the disk, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0463) Jens Kuehnel discovered that the InfiniBand driver contained a race condition. On systems using InfiniBand, a local attacker could send specially crafted requests to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-0695) Dan Rosenberg discovered that XFS did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could make crafted ioctl calls to leak portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0711) Kees Cook reported that /proc/pid/stat did not correctly filter certain memory locations. A local attacker could determine the memory layout of processes in an attempt to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2011-0726) Matthiew Herrb discovered that the drm modeset interface did not correctly handle a signed comparison. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1013) Marek Olsak discovered that the Radeon GPU drivers did not correctly validate certain registers. On systems with specific hardware, a local attacker could exploit this to write to arbitrary video memory. (CVE-2011-1016) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the CAP_SYS_MODULE capability was not needed to load kernel modules. A local attacker with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability could load existing kernel modules, possibly increasing the attack surface available on the system. (CVE-2011-1019) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Julien Tinnes discovered that the kernel did not correctly validate the signal structure from tkill(). A local attacker could exploit this to send signals to arbitrary threads, possibly bypassing expected restrictions. (CVE-2011-1182) Dan Rosenberg reported errors in the OSS (Open Sound System) MIDI interface. A local attacker on non-x86 systems might be able to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1476) Dan Rosenberg reported errors in the kernel's OSS (Open Sound System) driver for Yamaha FM synthesizer chips. A local user can exploit this to cause memory corruption, causing a denial of service or privilege escalation. (CVE-2011-1477) Ryan Sweat discovered that the GRO code did not correctly validate memory. In some configurations on systems using VLANs, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1478) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) It was discovered that the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) implementation incorrectly calculated lengths. If the net.sctp.addip_enable variable was turned on, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system. (CVE-2011-1573) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg reported an error in the old ABI compatibility layer of ARM kernels. A local attacker could exploit this flaw to cause a denial of service or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1759) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Timo Warns discovered that the EFI GUID partition table was not correctly parsed. A physically local attacker that could insert mountable devices could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1776) A flaw was found in the b43 driver in the Linux kernel. An attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service if the system has an active wireless interface using the b43 driver. (CVE-2011-3359) Yogesh Sharma discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle UNCs that had no prefixpaths. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3363) Maynard Johnson discovered that on POWER7, certain speculative events may raise a performance monitor exception. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-4611) Dan Rosenberg discovered flaws in the linux Rose (X.25 PLP) layer used by amateur radio. A local user or a remote user on an X.25 network could exploit these flaws to execute arbitrary code as root. (CVE-2011-4913).
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2019-01-02
    plugin id 55521
    published 2011-07-06
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55521
    title Ubuntu 10.04 LTS : linux-mvl-dove vulnerabilities (USN-1162-1)
  • NASL family Debian Local Security Checks
    NASL id DEBIAN_DSA-2264.NASL
    description Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Linux kernel that may lead to a privilege escalation, denial of service or information leak. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following problems : - CVE-2010-2524 David Howells reported an issue in the Common Internet File System (CIFS). Local users could cause arbitrary CIFS shares to be mounted by introducing malicious redirects. - CVE-2010-3875 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Linux implementation of the Amateur Radio AX.25 Level 2 protocol. Local users may obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2010-4075 Dan Rosenberg reported an issue in the tty layer that may allow local users to obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2010-4655 Kees Cook discovered several issues in the ethtool interface which may allow local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-0695 Jens Kuehnel reported an issue in the InfiniBand stack. Remote attackers can exploit a race condition to cause a denial of service (kernel panic). - CVE-2011-0710 Al Viro reported an issue in the /proc//status interface on the s390 architecture. Local users could gain access to sensitive memory in processes they do not own via the task_show_regs entry. - CVE-2011-0711 Dan Rosenberg reported an issue in the XFS filesystem. Local users may obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-0726 Kees Cook reported an issue in the /proc//stat implementation. Local users could learn the text location of a process, defeating protections provided by address space layout randomization (ASLR). - CVE-2011-1010 Timo Warns reported an issue in the Linux support for Mac partition tables. Local users with physical access could cause a denial of service (panic) by adding a storage device with a malicious map_count value. - CVE-2011-1012 Timo Warns reported an issue in the Linux support for LDM partition tables. Local users with physical access could cause a denial of service (Oops) by adding a storage device with an invalid VBLK value in the VMDB structure. - CVE-2011-1017 Timo Warns reported an issue in the Linux support for LDM partition tables. Users with physical access can gain access to sensitive kernel memory or gain elevated privileges by adding a storage device with a specially crafted LDM partition. - CVE-2011-1078 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Bluetooth subsystem. Local users can obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1079 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Bluetooth subsystem. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can cause a denial of service (kernel Oops). - CVE-2011-1080 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Netfilter subsystem. Local users can obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1090 Neil Horman discovered a memory leak in the setacl() call on NFSv4 filesystems. Local users can exploit this to cause a denial of service (Oops). - CVE-2011-1093 Johan Hovold reported an issue in the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) implementation. Remote users could cause a denial of service by sending data after closing a socket. - CVE-2011-1160 Peter Huewe reported an issue in the Linux kernel's support for TPM security chips. Local users with permission to open the device can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1163 Timo Warns reported an issue in the kernel support for Alpha OSF format disk partitions. Users with physical access can gain access to sensitive kernel memory by adding a storage device with a specially crafted OSF partition. - CVE-2011-1170 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Netfilter arp table implementation. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1171 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Netfilter IP table implementation. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1172 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Netfilter IP6 table implementation. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1173 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Acorn Econet protocol implementation. Local users can obtain access to sensitive kernel memory on systems that use this rare hardware. - CVE-2011-1180 Dan Rosenberg reported a buffer overflow in the Information Access Service of the IrDA protocol, used for Infrared devices. Remote attackers within IR device range can cause a denial of service or possibly gain elevated privileges. - CVE-2011-1182 Julien Tinnes reported an issue in the rt_sigqueueinfo interface. Local users can generate signals with falsified source pid and uid information. - CVE-2011-1477 Dan Rosenberg reported issues in the Open Sound System driver for cards that include a Yamaha FM synthesizer chip. Local users can cause memory corruption resulting in a denial of service. This issue does not affect official Debian Linux image packages as they no longer provide support for OSS. However, custom kernels built from Debians linux-source-2.6.26 may have enabled this configuration and would therefore be vulnerable. - CVE-2011-1493 Dan Rosenburg reported two issues in the Linux implementation of the Amateur Radio X.25 PLP (Rose) protocol. A remote user can cause a denial of service by providing specially crafted facilities fields. - CVE-2011-1577 Timo Warns reported an issue in the Linux support for GPT partition tables. Local users with physical access could cause a denial of service (Oops) by adding a storage device with a malicious partition table header. - CVE-2011-1593 Robert Swiecki reported a signednes issue in the next_pidmap() function, which can be exploited my local users to cause a denial of service. - CVE-2011-1598 Dave Jones reported an issue in the Broadcast Manager Controller Area Network (CAN/BCM) protocol that may allow local users to cause a NULL pointer dereference, resulting in a denial of service. - CVE-2011-1745 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Linux support for AGP devices. Local users can obtain elevated privileges or cause a denial of service due to missing bounds checking in the AGPIOC_BIND ioctl. On default Debian installations, this is exploitable only by users in the video group. - CVE-2011-1746 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Linux support for AGP devices. Local users can obtain elevated privileges or cause a denial of service due to missing bounds checking in the agp_allocate_memory and agp_create_user_memory. On default Debian installations, this is exploitable only by users in the video group. - CVE-2011-1748 Oliver Kartkopp reported an issue in the Controller Area Network (CAN) raw socket implementation which permits ocal users to cause a NULL pointer dereference, resulting in a denial of service. - CVE-2011-1759 Dan Rosenberg reported an issue in the support for executing 'old ABI' binaries on ARM processors. Local users can obtain elevated privileges due to insufficient bounds checking in the semtimedop system call. - CVE-2011-1767 Alexecy Dobriyan reported an issue in the GRE over IP implementation. Remote users can cause a denial of service by sending a packet during module initialization. - CVE-2011-1768 Alexecy Dobriyan reported an issue in the IP tunnels implementation. Remote users can cause a denial of service by sending a packet during module initialization. - CVE-2011-1776 Timo Warns reported an issue in the Linux implementation for GUID partitions. Users with physical access can gain access to sensitive kernel memory by adding a storage device with a specially crafted corrupted invalid partition table. - CVE-2011-2022 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Linux support for AGP devices. Local users can obtain elevated privileges or cause a denial of service due to missing bounds checking in the AGPIOC_UNBIND ioctl. On default Debian installations, this is exploitable only by users in the video group. - CVE-2011-2182 Ben Hutchings reported an issue with the fix for CVE-2011-1017 (see above) that made it insufficient to resolve the issue.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-10
    plugin id 55170
    published 2011-06-20
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55170
    title Debian DSA-2264-1 : linux-2.6 - privilege escalation/denial of service/information leak
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1167-1.NASL
    description Aristide Fattori and Roberto Paleari reported a flaw in the Linux kernel's handling of IPv4 icmp packets. A remote user could exploit this to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1927) Goldwyn Rodrigues discovered that the OCFS2 filesystem did not correctly clear memory when writing certain file holes. A local attacker could exploit this to read uninitialized data from the disk, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0463) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Johan Hovold discovered that the DCCP network stack did not correctly handle certain packet combinations. A remote attacker could send specially crafted network traffic that would crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1093) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Dan Rosenberg reported errors in the OSS (Open Sound System) MIDI interface. A local attacker on non-x86 systems might be able to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1476) Dan Rosenberg reported errors in the kernel's OSS (Open Sound System) driver for Yamaha FM synthesizer chips. A local user can exploit this to cause memory corruption, causing a denial of service or privilege escalation. (CVE-2011-1477) It was discovered that the security fix for CVE-2010-4250 introduced a regression. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1479) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg reported an error in the old ABI compatibility layer of ARM kernels. A local attacker could exploit this flaw to cause a denial of service or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1759) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Ben Greear discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle direct I/O. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1771) Timo Warns discovered that the EFI GUID partition table was not correctly parsed. A physically local attacker that could insert mountable devices could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1776) It was discovered that an mmap() call with the MAP_PRIVATE flag on '/dev/zero' was incorrectly handled. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2479) Robert Swiecki discovered that mapping extensions were incorrectly handled. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2496) The linux kernel did not properly account for PTE pages when deciding which task to kill in out of memory conditions. A local, unprivileged could exploit this flaw to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2498) A flaw was found in the b43 driver in the Linux kernel. An attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service if the system has an active wireless interface using the b43 driver. (CVE-2011-3359) Yogesh Sharma discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle UNCs that had no prefixpaths. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3363) Dan Rosenberg discovered flaws in the linux Rose (X.25 PLP) layer used by amateur radio. A local user or a remote user on an X.25 network could exploit these flaws to execute arbitrary code as root. (CVE-2011-4913). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 55591
    published 2011-07-14
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55591
    title Ubuntu 11.04 : linux vulnerabilities (USN-1167-1)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1183-1.NASL
    description Dan Rosenberg discovered that multiple terminal ioctls did not correctly initialize structure memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4076, CVE-2010-4077) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 55762
    published 2011-08-04
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55762
    title Ubuntu 10.10 : linux vulnerabilities (USN-1183-1)
  • NASL family Oracle Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ORACLELINUX_ELSA-2011-0836.NASL
    description From Red Hat Security Advisory 2011:0836 : Updated kernel packages that fix multiple security issues and various bugs are now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. The kernel packages contain the Linux kernel, the core of any Linux operating system. This update fixes the following security issues : * An integer underflow flaw, leading to a buffer overflow, was found in the Linux kernel's Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) implementation. This could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770, Important) * Missing sanity checks were found in setup_arg_pages() in the Linux kernel. When making the size of the argument and environment area on the stack very large, it could trigger a BUG_ON(), resulting in a local denial of service. (CVE-2010-3858, Moderate) * A missing validation check was found in the bcm_release() and raw_release() functions in the Linux kernel's Controller Area Network (CAN) implementation. This could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748, Moderate) * The fix for Red Hat Bugzilla bug 656461, as provided in RHSA-2011:0542, introduced a regression in the cifs_close() function in the Linux kernel's Common Internet File System (CIFS) implementation. A local, unprivileged user with write access to a CIFS file system could use this flaw to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1771, Moderate) Red Hat would like to thank Dan Rosenberg for reporting CVE-2011-1770; Brad Spengler for reporting CVE-2010-3858; and Oliver Hartkopp for reporting CVE-2011-1748. This update also fixes various bugs. Documentation for these bug fixes will be available shortly from the Technical Notes document linked to in the References section. Users should upgrade to these updated packages, which contain backported patches to resolve these issues, and fix the bugs noted in the Technical Notes. The system must be rebooted for this update to take effect.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-02-09
    plugin id 68277
    published 2013-07-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=68277
    title Oracle Linux 6 : kernel (ELSA-2011-0836)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1159-1.NASL
    description Brad Spengler discovered that the kernel did not correctly account for userspace memory allocations during exec() calls. A local attacker could exploit this to consume all system memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4243) Alexander Duyck discovered that the Intel Gigabit Ethernet driver did not correctly handle certain configurations. If such a device was configured without VLANs, a remote attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4263) Nelson Elhage discovered that Econet did not correctly handle AUN packets over UDP. A local attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4342) Dan Rosenberg discovered that IRDA did not correctly check the size of buffers. On non-x86 systems, a local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4529) Dan Rosenburg discovered that the CAN subsystem leaked kernel addresses into the /proc filesystem. A local attacker could use this to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2010-4565) Goldwyn Rodrigues discovered that the OCFS2 filesystem did not correctly clear memory when writing certain file holes. A local attacker could exploit this to read uninitialized data from the disk, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0463) Jens Kuehnel discovered that the InfiniBand driver contained a race condition. On systems using InfiniBand, a local attacker could send specially crafted requests to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-0695) Dan Rosenberg discovered that XFS did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could make crafted ioctl calls to leak portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0711) Kees Cook reported that /proc/pid/stat did not correctly filter certain memory locations. A local attacker could determine the memory layout of processes in an attempt to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2011-0726) Matthiew Herrb discovered that the drm modeset interface did not correctly handle a signed comparison. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1013) Marek Olsak discovered that the Radeon GPU drivers did not correctly validate certain registers. On systems with specific hardware, a local attacker could exploit this to write to arbitrary video memory. (CVE-2011-1016) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the CAP_SYS_MODULE capability was not needed to load kernel modules. A local attacker with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability could load existing kernel modules, possibly increasing the attack surface available on the system. (CVE-2011-1019) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Julien Tinnes discovered that the kernel did not correctly validate the signal structure from tkill(). A local attacker could exploit this to send signals to arbitrary threads, possibly bypassing expected restrictions. (CVE-2011-1182) Dan Rosenberg reported errors in the OSS (Open Sound System) MIDI interface. A local attacker on non-x86 systems might be able to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1476) Dan Rosenberg reported errors in the kernel's OSS (Open Sound System) driver for Yamaha FM synthesizer chips. A local user can exploit this to cause memory corruption, causing a denial of service or privilege escalation. (CVE-2011-1477) Ryan Sweat discovered that the GRO code did not correctly validate memory. In some configurations on systems using VLANs, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1478) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) It was discovered that the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) implementation incorrectly calculated lengths. If the net.sctp.addip_enable variable was turned on, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system. (CVE-2011-1573) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg reported an error in the old ABI compatibility layer of ARM kernels. A local attacker could exploit this flaw to cause a denial of service or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1759) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Timo Warns discovered that the EFI GUID partition table was not correctly parsed. A physically local attacker that could insert mountable devices could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1776) A flaw was found in the b43 driver in the Linux kernel. An attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of service if the system has an active wireless interface using the b43 driver. (CVE-2011-3359) Yogesh Sharma discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle UNCs that had no prefixpaths. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3363) Maynard Johnson discovered that on POWER7, certain speculative events may raise a performance monitor exception. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-4611) Dan Rosenberg discovered flaws in the linux Rose (X.25 PLP) layer used by amateur radio. A local user or a remote user on an X.25 network could exploit these flaws to execute arbitrary code as root. (CVE-2011-4913).
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-05-26
    plugin id 55589
    published 2011-07-14
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55589
    title Ubuntu 10.10 : linux-mvl-dove vulnerabilities (USN-1159-1)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1212-1.NASL
    description Goldwyn Rodrigues discovered that the OCFS2 filesystem did not correctly clear memory when writing certain file holes. A local attacker could exploit this to read uninitialized data from the disk, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0463) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) It was discovered that the /proc filesystem did not correctly handle permission changes when programs executed. A local attacker could hold open files to examine details about programs running with higher privileges, potentially increasing the chances of exploiting additional vulnerabilities. (CVE-2011-1020) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Julien Tinnes discovered that the kernel did not correctly validate the signal structure from tkill(). A local attacker could exploit this to send signals to arbitrary threads, possibly bypassing expected restrictions. (CVE-2011-1182) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the X.25 Rose network stack did not correctly handle certain fields. If a system was running with Rose enabled, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1493) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Phil Oester discovered that the network bonding system did not correctly handle large queues. On some systems, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1581) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Ben Greear discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle direct I/O. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1771) Vasiliy Kulikov and Dan Rosenberg discovered that ecryptfs did not correctly check the origin of mount points. A local attacker could exploit this to trick the system into unmounting arbitrary mount points, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1833) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that taskstats listeners were not correctly handled. A local attacker could expoit this to exhaust memory and CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2484) It was discovered that Bluetooth l2cap and rfcomm did not correctly initialize structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of the kernel stack, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-2492) Sami Liedes discovered that ext4 did not correctly handle missing root inodes. A local attacker could trigger the mount of a specially crafted filesystem to cause the system to crash, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2493) It was discovered that GFS2 did not correctly check block sizes. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2689) Fernando Gont discovered that the IPv6 stack used predictable fragment identification numbers. A remote attacker could exploit this to exhaust network resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2699) The performance counter subsystem did not correctly handle certain counters. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2918)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-06-29
    plugin id 56257
    published 2011-09-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=56257
    title USN-1212-1 : linux-ti-omap4 vulnerabilities
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1204-1.NASL
    description Dan Rosenberg discovered that the Linux kernel TIPC implementation contained multiple integer signedness errors. A local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-3859) Dan Rosenberg discovered that multiple terminal ioctls did not correctly initialize structure memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4075, CVE-2010-4076, CVE-2010-4077) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the socket filters did not correctly initialize structure memory. A local attacker could create malicious filters to read portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4158) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the Linux kernel L2TP implementation contained multiple integer signedness errors. A local attacker could exploit this to to crash the kernel, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4160) Dan Rosenberg discovered that certain iovec operations did not calculate page counts correctly. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4162) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the SCSI subsystem did not correctly validate iov segments. A local attacker with access to a SCSI device could send specially crafted requests to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4163, CVE-2010-4668) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the RDS protocol did not correctly check ioctl arguments. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4175) Alan Cox discovered that the HCI UART driver did not correctly check if a write operation was available. If the mmap_min-addr sysctl was changed from the Ubuntu default to a value of 0, a local attacker could exploit this flaw to gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4242) Brad Spengler discovered that the kernel did not correctly account for userspace memory allocations during exec() calls. A local attacker could exploit this to consume all system memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4243) Alex Shi and Eric Dumazet discovered that the network stack did not correctly handle packet backlogs. A remote attacker could exploit this by sending a large amount of network traffic to cause the system to run out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4251, CVE-2010-4805) It was discovered that the ICMP stack did not correctly handle certain unreachable messages. If a remote attacker were able to acquire a socket lock, they could send specially crafted traffic that would crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4526) Dan Carpenter discovered that the Infiniband driver did not correctly handle certain requests. A local user could exploit this to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4649, CVE-2011-1044) Kees Cook reported that /proc/pid/stat did not correctly filter certain memory locations. A local attacker could determine the memory layout of processes in an attempt to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2011-0726) Timo Warns discovered that MAC partition parsing routines did not correctly calculate block counts. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1010) Timo Warns discovered that LDM partition parsing routines did not correctly calculate block counts. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1012) Matthiew Herrb discovered that the drm modeset interface did not correctly handle a signed comparison. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1013) It was discovered that the /proc filesystem did not correctly handle permission changes when programs executed. A local attacker could hold open files to examine details about programs running with higher privileges, potentially increasing the chances of exploiting additional vulnerabilities. (CVE-2011-1020) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Nelson Elhage discovered that the epoll subsystem did not correctly handle certain structures. A local attacker could create malicious requests that would hang the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1082) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Johan Hovold discovered that the DCCP network stack did not correctly handle certain packet combinations. A remote attacker could send specially crafted network traffic that would crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1093) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Ryan Sweat discovered that the GRO code did not correctly validate memory. In some configurations on systems using VLANs, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1478) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the X.25 Rose network stack did not correctly handle certain fields. If a system was running with Rose enabled, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1493) Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Vasiliy Kulikov and Dan Rosenberg discovered that ecryptfs did not correctly check the origin of mount points. A local attacker could exploit this to trick the system into unmounting arbitrary mount points, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1833) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that taskstats listeners were not correctly handled. A local attacker could expoit this to exhaust memory and CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2484) It was discovered that Bluetooth l2cap and rfcomm did not correctly initialize structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of the kernel stack, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-2492) Fernando Gont discovered that the IPv6 stack used predictable fragment identification numbers. A remote attacker could exploit this to exhaust network resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2699) The performance counter subsystem did not correctly handle certain counters. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2918)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2016-01-14
    plugin id 56192
    published 2011-09-14
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=56192
    title USN-1204-1 : linux-fsl-imx51 vulnerabilities
  • NASL family Oracle Linux Local Security Checks
    NASL id ORACLELINUX_ELSA-2011-2019.NASL
    description Description of changes: [2.6.32-100.35.1.el6uek] - [net] dccp: handle invalid feature options length {CVE-2011-1770} - [net] can: add missing socket check in can/raw release {CVE-2011-1748} - [net] can: Add missing socket check in can/bcm release {CVE-2011-1598}
    last seen 2018-09-01
    modified 2015-12-01
    plugin id 68418
    published 2013-07-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=68418
    title Oracle Linux 5 / 6 : Unbreakable Enterprise kernel (ELSA-2011-2019)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1161-1.NASL
    description Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that kvm did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of the kernel stack, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-3881) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg reported an error in the old ABI compatibility layer of ARM kernels. A local attacker could exploit this flaw to cause a denial of service or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1759) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Timo Warns discovered that the EFI GUID partition table was not correctly parsed. A physically local attacker that could insert mountable devices could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1776) Yogesh Sharma discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle UNCs that had no prefixpaths. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3363). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 55590
    published 2011-07-14
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55590
    title Ubuntu 10.04 LTS : linux-ec2 vulnerabilities (USN-1161-1)
  • NASL family Debian Local Security Checks
    NASL id DEBIAN_DSA-2240.NASL
    description Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Linux kernel that may lead to a denial of service or privilege escalation. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project identifies the following problems : - CVE-2010-3875 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Linux implementation of the Amateur Radio AX.25 Level 2 protocol. Local users may obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-0695 Jens Kuehnel reported an issue in the InfiniBand stack. Remote attackers can exploit a race condition to cause a denial of service (kernel panic). - CVE-2011-0711 Dan Rosenberg reported an issue in the XFS filesystem. Local users may obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-0726 Kees Cook reported an issue in the /proc/pid/stat implementation. Local users could learn the text location of a process, defeating protections provided by address space layout randomization (ASLR). - CVE-2011-1016 Marek Olsak discovered an issue in the driver for ATI/AMD Radeon video chips. Local users could pass arbitrary values to video memory and the graphics translation table, resulting in denial of service or escalated privileges. On default Debian installations, this is exploitable only by members of the 'video' group. - CVE-2011-1078 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Bluetooth subsystem. Local users can obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1079 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Bluetooth subsystem. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can cause a denial of service (kernel Oops). - CVE-2011-1080 Vasiliy Kulikov discovered an issue in the Netfilter subsystem. Local users can obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1090 Neil Horman discovered a memory leak in the setacl() call on NFSv4 filesystems. Local users can exploit this to cause a denial of service (Oops). - CVE-2011-1160 Peter Huewe reported an issue in the Linux kernel's support for TPM security chips. Local users with permission to open the device can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1163 Timo Warns reported an issue in the kernel support for Alpha OSF format disk partitions. Users with physical access can gain access to sensitive kernel memory by adding a storage device with a specially crafted OSF partition. - CVE-2011-1170 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Netfilter ARP table implementation. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1171 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Netfilter IP table implementation. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1172 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Netfilter IPv6 table implementation. Local users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability can gain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1173 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Acorn Econet protocol implementation. Local users can obtain access to sensitive kernel memory on systems that use this rare hardware. - CVE-2011-1180 Dan Rosenberg reported a buffer overflow in the Information Access Service of the IrDA protocol, used for Infrared devices. Remote attackers within IR device range can cause a denial of service or possibly gain elevated privileges. - CVE-2011-1182 Julien Tinnes reported an issue in the rt_sigqueueinfo interface. Local users can generate signals with falsified source pid and uid information. - CVE-2011-1476 Dan Rosenberg reported issues in the Open Sound System MIDI interface that allow local users to cause a denial of service. This issue does not affect official Debian Linux image packages as they no longer provide support for OSS. However, custom kernels built from Debian's linux-source-2.6.32 may have enabled this configuration and would therefore be vulnerable. - CVE-2011-1477 Dan Rosenberg reported issues in the Open Sound System driver for cards that include a Yamaha FM synthesizer chip. Local users can cause memory corruption resulting in a denial of service. This issue does not affect official Debian Linux image packages as they no longer provide support for OSS. However, custom kernels built from Debian's linux-source-2.6.32 may have enabled this configuration and would therefore be vulnerable. - CVE-2011-1478 Ryan Sweat reported an issue in the Generic Receive Offload (GRO) support in the Linux networking subsystem. If an interface has GRO enabled and is running in promiscuous mode, remote users can cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) by sending packets on an unknown VLAN. - CVE-2011-1493 Dan Rosenburg reported two issues in the Linux implementation of the Amateur Radio X.25 PLP (Rose) protocol. A remote user can cause a denial of service by providing specially crafted facilities fields. - CVE-2011-1494 Dan Rosenberg reported an issue in the /dev/mpt2ctl interface provided by the driver for LSI MPT Fusion SAS 2.0 controllers. Local users can obtain elevated privileges by specially crafted ioctl calls. On default Debian installations this is not exploitable as this interface is only accessible to root. - CVE-2011-1495 Dan Rosenberg reported two additional issues in the /dev/mpt2ctl interface provided by the driver for LSI MPT Fusion SAS 2.0 controllers. Local users can obtain elevated privileges and read arbitrary kernel memory by using specially crafted ioctl calls. On default Debian installations this is not exploitable as this interface is only accessible to root. - CVE-2011-1585 Jeff Layton reported an issue in the Common Internet File System (CIFS). Local users can bypass authentication requirements for shares that are already mounted by another user. - CVE-2011-1593 Robert Swiecki reported a signedness issue in the next_pidmap() function, which can be exploited by local users to cause a denial of service. - CVE-2011-1598 Dave Jones reported an issue in the Broadcast Manager Controller Area Network (CAN/BCM) protocol that may allow local users to cause a NULL pointer dereference, resulting in a denial of service. - CVE-2011-1745 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Linux support for AGP devices. Local users can obtain elevated privileges or cause a denial of service due to missing bounds checking in the AGPIOC_BIND ioctl. On default Debian installations, this is exploitable only by users in the 'video' group. - CVE-2011-1746 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Linux support for AGP devices. Local users can obtain elevated privileges or cause a denial of service due to missing bounds checking in the agp_allocate_memory and agp_create_user_memory routines. On default Debian installations, this is exploitable only by users in the 'video' group. - CVE-2011-1748 Oliver Kartkopp reported an issue in the Controller Area Network (CAN) raw socket implementation which permits local users to cause a NULL pointer dereference, resulting in a denial of service. - CVE-2011-1759 Dan Rosenberg reported an issue in the support for executing 'old ABI' binaries on ARM processors. Local users can obtain elevated privileges due to insufficient bounds checking in the semtimedop system call. - CVE-2011-1767 Alexecy Dobriyan reported an issue in the GRE over IP implementation. Remote users can cause a denial of service by sending a packet during module initialization. - CVE-2011-1770 Dan Rosenberg reported an issue in the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP). Remote users can cause a denial of service or potentially obtain access to sensitive kernel memory. - CVE-2011-1776 Timo Warns reported an issue in the Linux implementation for GUID partitions. Users with physical access can gain access to sensitive kernel memory by adding a storage device with a specially crafted corrupted invalid partition table. - CVE-2011-2022 Vasiliy Kulikov reported an issue in the Linux support for AGP devices. Local users can obtain elevated privileges or cause a denial of service due to missing bounds checking in the AGPIOC_UNBIND ioctl. On default Debian installations, this is exploitable only by users in the video group. This update also includes changes queued for the next point release of Debian 6.0, which also fix various non-security issues. These additional changes are described in the package changelog.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-11-10
    plugin id 55028
    published 2011-06-10
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55028
    title Debian DSA-2240-1 : linux-2.6 - privilege escalation/denial of service/information leak
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1187-1.NASL
    description It was discovered that KVM did not correctly initialize certain CPU registers. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-3698) Thomas Pollet discovered that the RDS network protocol did not check certain iovec buffers. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or possibly execute arbitrary code as the root user. (CVE-2010-3865) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Linux kernel X.25 implementation did not correctly clear kernel memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-3875) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Linux kernel sockets implementation did not properly initialize certain structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-3876) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the TIPC interface did not correctly initialize certain structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-3877) Nelson Elhage discovered that the Linux kernel IPv4 implementation did not properly audit certain bytecodes in netlink messages. A local attacker could exploit this to cause the kernel to hang, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-3880) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that kvm did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of the kernel stack, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-3881) Dan Rosenberg discovered that multiple terminal ioctls did not correctly initialize structure memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4075, CVE-2010-4076, CVE-2010-4077) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the ivtv V4L driver did not correctly initialize certian structures. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4079) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the semctl syscall did not correctly clear kernel memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4083) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the SCSI subsystem did not correctly validate iov segments. A local attacker with access to a SCSI device could send specially crafted requests to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4163, CVE-2010-4668) It was discovered that multithreaded exec did not handle CPU timers correctly. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4248) Nelson Elhage discovered that Econet did not correctly handle AUN packets over UDP. A local attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4342) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the install_special_mapping function could bypass the mmap_min_addr restriction. A local attacker could exploit this to mmap 4096 bytes below the mmap_min_addr area, possibly improving the chances of performing NULL pointer dereference attacks. (CVE-2010-4346) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the OSS subsystem did not handle name termination correctly. A local attacker could exploit this crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4527) Dan Rosenberg discovered that IRDA did not correctly check the size of buffers. On non-x86 systems, a local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2010-4529) Dan Rosenburg discovered that the CAN subsystem leaked kernel addresses into the /proc filesystem. A local attacker could use this to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2010-4565) Dan Carpenter discovered that the Infiniband driver did not correctly handle certain requests. A local user could exploit this to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4649, CVE-2011-1044) Kees Cook discovered that the IOWarrior USB device driver did not correctly check certain size fields. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted USB device to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2010-4656) Goldwyn Rodrigues discovered that the OCFS2 filesystem did not correctly clear memory when writing certain file holes. A local attacker could exploit this to read uninitialized data from the disk, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0463) Dan Carpenter discovered that the TTPCI DVB driver did not check certain values during an ioctl. If the dvb-ttpci module was loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-0521) Jens Kuehnel discovered that the InfiniBand driver contained a race condition. On systems using InfiniBand, a local attacker could send specially crafted requests to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-0695) Dan Rosenberg discovered that XFS did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could make crafted ioctl calls to leak portions of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-0711) Rafael Dominguez Vega discovered that the caiaq Native Instruments USB driver did not correctly validate string lengths. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted USB device to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-0712) Kees Cook reported that /proc/pid/stat did not correctly filter certain memory locations. A local attacker could determine the memory layout of processes in an attempt to increase the chances of a successful memory corruption exploit. (CVE-2011-0726) Timo Warns discovered that MAC partition parsing routines did not correctly calculate block counts. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system or potentially gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1010) Timo Warns discovered that LDM partition parsing routines did not correctly calculate block counts. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1012) Matthiew Herrb discovered that the drm modeset interface did not correctly handle a signed comparison. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1013) Marek Olsak discovered that the Radeon GPU drivers did not correctly validate certain registers. On systems with specific hardware, a local attacker could exploit this to write to arbitrary video memory. (CVE-2011-1016) Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the CAP_SYS_MODULE capability was not needed to load kernel modules. A local attacker with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability could load existing kernel modules, possibly increasing the attack surface available on the system. (CVE-2011-1019) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1078) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Bluetooth stack did not correctly check that device name strings were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1079) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that bridge network filtering did not check that name fields were NULL terminated. A local attacker could exploit this to leak contents of kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1080) Nelson Elhage discovered that the epoll subsystem did not correctly handle certain structures. A local attacker could create malicious requests that would hang the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1082) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Johan Hovold discovered that the DCCP network stack did not correctly handle certain packet combinations. A remote attacker could send specially crafted network traffic that would crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1093) Peter Huewe discovered that the TPM device did not correctly initialize memory. A local attacker could exploit this to read kernel heap memory contents, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1160) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Dan Rosenberg discovered that some ALSA drivers did not correctly check the adapter index during ioctl calls. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could make a specially crafted ioctl call to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1169) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the netfilter code did not check certain strings copied from userspace. A local attacker with netfilter access could exploit this to read kernel memory or crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1170, CVE-2011-1171, CVE-2011-1172, CVE-2011-2534) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the Acorn Universal Networking driver did not correctly initialize memory. A remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to read kernel stack memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1173) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the IRDA subsystem did not correctly check certain field sizes. If a system was using IRDA, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1180) Julien Tinnes discovered that the kernel did not correctly validate the signal structure from tkill(). A local attacker could exploit this to send signals to arbitrary threads, possibly bypassing expected restrictions. (CVE-2011-1182) Ryan Sweat discovered that the GRO code did not correctly validate memory. In some configurations on systems using VLANs, a remote attacker could send specially crafted traffic to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1478) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) Timo Warns discovered that the GUID partition parsing routines did not correctly validate certain structures. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 55785
    published 2011-08-09
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55785
    title Ubuntu 10.04 LTS : linux-lts-backport-maverick vulnerabilities (USN-1187-1)
  • NASL family SuSE Local Security Checks
    NASL id SUSE_11_KERNEL-110718.NASL
    description The SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 Service Pack 1 kernel was updated to 2.6.32.43 and fixes various bugs and security issues. The following security issues were fixed : - The normal mmap paths all avoid creating a mapping where the pgoff inside the mapping could wrap around due to overflow. However, an expanding mremap() can take such a non-wrapping mapping and make it bigger and cause a wrapping condition. (CVE-2011-2496) - A local unprivileged user able to access a NFS filesystem could use file locking to deadlock parts of an nfs server under some circumstance. (CVE-2011-2491) - Fixed a race between ksmd and other memory management code, which could result in a NULL ptr dereference and kernel crash. (CVE-2011-2183) - In both trigger_scan and sched_scan operations, we were checking for the SSID length before assigning the value correctly. Since the memory was just kzalloced, the check was always failing and SSID with over 32 characters were allowed to go through. This required CAP_NET_ADMIN privileges to be exploited. (CVE-2011-2517) - A malicious user or buggy application could inject diagnosing byte code and trigger an infinite loop in inet_diag_bc_audit(). (CVE-2011-2213) - The code for evaluating LDM partitions (in fs/partitions/ldm.c) contained bugs that could crash the kernel for certain corrupted LDM partitions. (CVE-2011-1017 / CVE-2011-1012 / CVE-2011-2182) - Multiple integer overflows in the next_pidmap function in kernel/pid.c in the Linux kernel allowed local users to cause a denial of service (system crash) via a crafted (1) getdents or (2) readdir system call. (CVE-2011-1593) - The proc filesystem implementation in the Linux kernel did not restrict access to the /proc directory tree of a process after this process performs an exec of a setuid program, which allowed local users to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service via open, lseek, read, and write system calls. (CVE-2011-1020) - When using a setuid root mount.cifs, local users could hijack password protected mounted CIFS shares of other local users. (CVE-2011-1585) - Kernel information via the TPM devices could by used by local attackers to read kernel memory. (CVE-2011-1160) - The Linux kernel automatically evaluated partition tables of storage devices. The code for evaluating EFI GUID partitions (in fs/partitions/efi.c) contained a bug that causes a kernel oops on certain corrupted GUID partition tables, which might be used by local attackers to crash the kernel or potentially execute code. (CVE-2011-1577) - In a bluetooth ioctl, struct sco_conninfo has one padding byte in the end. Local variable cinfo of type sco_conninfo was copied to userspace with this uninizialized one byte, leading to an old stack contents leak. (CVE-2011-1078) - In a bluetooth ioctl, struct ca is copied from userspace. It was not checked whether the 'device' field was NULL terminated. This potentially leads to BUG() inside of alloc_netdev_mqs() and/or information leak by creating a device with a name made of contents of kernel stack. (CVE-2011-1079) - In ebtables rule loading, struct tmp is copied from userspace. It was not checked whether the 'name' field is NULL terminated. This may have lead to buffer overflow and passing contents of kernel stack as a module name to try_then_request_module() and, consequently, to modprobe commandline. It would be seen by all userspace processes. (CVE-2011-1080) - The econet_sendmsg function in net/econet/af_econet.c in the Linux kernel on the x86_64 platform allowed remote attackers to obtain potentially sensitive information from kernel stack memory by reading uninitialized data in the ah field of an Acorn Universal Networking (AUN) packet. (CVE-2011-1173) - net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c in the IPv4 implementation in the Linux kernel did not place the expected '0' character at the end of string data in the values of certain structure members, which allowed local users to obtain potentially sensitive information from kernel memory by leveraging the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to issue a crafted request, and then reading the argument to the resulting modprobe process. (CVE-2011-1170) - net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c in the IPv4 implementation in the Linux kernel did not place the expected '0' character at the end of string data in the values of certain structure members, which allowed local users to obtain potentially sensitive information from kernel memory by leveraging the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to issue a crafted request, and then reading the argument to the resulting modprobe process. (CVE-2011-1171) - net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c in the IPv6 implementation in the Linux kernel did not place the expected '0' character at the end of string data in the values of certain structure members, which allowed local users to obtain potentially sensitive information from kernel memory by leveraging the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability to issue a crafted request, and then reading the argument to the resulting modprobe process. (CVE-2011-1172) - Multiple integer overflows in the (1) agp_allocate_memory and (2) agp_create_user_memory functions in drivers/char/agp/generic.c in the Linux kernel before allowed local users to trigger buffer overflows, and consequently cause a denial of service (system crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact, via vectors related to calls that specify a large number of memory pages. (CVE-2011-1746) - Integer overflow in the agp_generic_insert_memory function in drivers/char/agp/generic.c in the Linux kernel allowed local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (system crash) via a crafted AGPIOC_BIND agp_ioctl ioctl call. (CVE-2011-1745) - The bcm_release function in net/can/bcm.c in the Linux kernel did not properly validate a socket data structure, which allowed local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted release operation. (CVE-2011-1598) - The raw_release function in net/can/raw.c in the Linux kernel did not properly validate a socket data structure, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted release operation. (CVE-2011-1748)
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2013-10-25
    plugin id 55686
    published 2011-07-26
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55686
    title SuSE 11.1 Security Update : Linux kernel (SAT Patch Numbers 4884 / 4888 / 4889)
  • NASL family Red Hat Local Security Checks
    NASL id REDHAT-RHSA-2011-1253.NASL
    description Updated kernel-rt packages that fix multiple security issues and various bugs are now available for Red Hat Enterprise MRG 2.0. The Red Hat Security Response Team has rated this update as having important security impact. Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base scores, which give detailed severity ratings, are available for each vulnerability from the CVE links in the References section. Security fixes : * A flaw in the SCTP and DCCP implementations could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4526, CVE-2011-1770, Important) * Flaws in the Management Module Support for Message Passing Technology (MPT) based controllers could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service, an information leak, or escalate their privileges. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495, Important) * Flaws in the AGPGART driver, and a flaw in agp_allocate_memory(), could allow a local user to cause a denial of service or escalate their privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022, CVE-2011-1746, Important) * A flaw in the client-side NLM implementation could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2491, Important) * A flaw in the Bluetooth implementation could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service or escalate their privileges. (CVE-2011-2497, Important) * Flaws in the netlink-based wireless configuration interface could allow a local user, who has the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability, to cause a denial of service or escalate their privileges on systems that have an active wireless interface. (CVE-2011-2517, Important) * The maximum file offset handling for ext4 file systems could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-2695, Important) * A local, unprivileged user could allocate large amounts of memory not visible to the OOM killer, causing a denial of service. (CVE-2010-4243, Moderate) * The proc file system could allow a local, unprivileged user to obtain sensitive information or possibly cause integrity issues. (CVE-2011-1020, Moderate) * A local, privileged user could possibly write arbitrary kernel memory via /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/custom_method. (CVE-2011-1021, Moderate) * Inconsistency in the methods for allocating and freeing NFSv4 ACL data; CVE-2010-4250 fix caused a regression; a flaw in next_pidmap() and inet_diag_bc_audit(); flaws in the CAN implementation; a race condition in the memory merging support; a flaw in the taskstats subsystem; and the way mapping expansions were handled could allow a local, unprivileged user to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090, CVE-2011-1479, CVE-2011-1593, CVE-2011-2213, CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748, CVE-2011-2183, CVE-2011-2484, CVE-2011-2496, Moderate) * A flaw in GRO could result in a denial of service when a malformed VLAN frame is received. (CVE-2011-1478, Moderate) * napi_reuse_skb() could be called on VLAN packets allowing an attacker on the local network to possibly trigger a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1576, Moderate) * A denial of service could occur if packets were received while the ipip or ip_gre module was being loaded. (CVE-2011-1767, CVE-2011-1768, Moderate) * Information leaks. (CVE-2011-1160, CVE-2011-2492, CVE-2011-2495, Low) * Flaws in the EFI GUID Partition Table implementation could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1577, CVE-2011-1776, Low) * While a user has a CIFS share mounted that required successful authentication, a local, unprivileged user could mount that share without knowing the correct password if mount.cifs was setuid root. (CVE-2011-1585, Low) Red Hat would like to thank Dan Rosenberg for reporting CVE-2011-1770, CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495, CVE-2011-2497, and CVE-2011-2213; Vasiliy Kulikov of Openwall for reporting CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022, CVE-2011-1746, CVE-2011-2484, and CVE-2011-2495; Vasily Averin for reporting CVE-2011-2491; Brad Spengler for reporting CVE-2010-4243; Kees Cook for reporting CVE-2011-1020; Robert Swiecki for reporting CVE-2011-1593 and CVE-2011-2496; Oliver Hartkopp for reporting CVE-2011-1748; Andrea Righi for reporting CVE-2011-2183; Ryan Sweat for reporting CVE-2011-1478 and CVE-2011-1576; Peter Huewe for reporting CVE-2011-1160; Marek Kroemeke and Filip Palian for reporting CVE-2011-2492; and Timo Warns for reporting CVE-2011-1577 and CVE-2011-1776.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-20
    plugin id 76634
    published 2014-07-22
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=76634
    title RHEL 6 : MRG (RHSA-2011:1253)
  • NASL family Ubuntu Local Security Checks
    NASL id UBUNTU_USN-1168-1.NASL
    description Timo Warns discovered that the LDM disk partition handling code did not correctly handle certain values. By inserting a specially crafted disk device, a local attacker could exploit this to gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1017) Neil Horman discovered that NFSv4 did not correctly handle certain orders of operation with ACL data. A remote attacker with access to an NFSv4 mount could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1090) Timo Warns discovered that OSF partition parsing routines did not correctly clear memory. A local attacker with physical access could plug in a specially crafted block device to read kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1163) Dan Rosenberg discovered that MPT devices did not correctly validate certain values in ioctl calls. If these drivers were loaded, a local attacker could exploit this to read arbitrary kernel memory, leading to a loss of privacy. (CVE-2011-1494, CVE-2011-1495) Tavis Ormandy discovered that the pidmap function did not correctly handle large requests. A local attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1593) Oliver Hartkopp and Dave Jones discovered that the CAN network driver did not correctly validate certain socket structures. If this driver was loaded, a local attacker could crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1598, CVE-2011-1748) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check certain ioctl values. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service, or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1745, CVE-2011-2022) Vasiliy Kulikov discovered that the AGP driver did not check the size of certain memory allocations. A local attacker with access to the video subsystem could exploit this to run the system out of memory, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1746) Dan Rosenberg reported an error in the old ABI compatibility layer of ARM kernels. A local attacker could exploit this flaw to cause a denial of service or gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1759) Dan Rosenberg discovered that the DCCP stack did not correctly handle certain packet structures. A remote attacker could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-1770) Timo Warns discovered that the EFI GUID partition table was not correctly parsed. A physically local attacker that could insert mountable devices could exploit this to crash the system or possibly gain root privileges. (CVE-2011-1776) Yogesh Sharma discovered that CIFS did not correctly handle UNCs that had no prefixpaths. A local attacker with access to a CIFS partition could exploit this to crash the system, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2011-3363). Note that Tenable Network Security has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Ubuntu security advisory. Tenable has attempted to automatically clean and format it as much as possible without introducing additional issues.
    last seen 2019-02-21
    modified 2018-12-01
    plugin id 55606
    published 2011-07-18
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=55606
    title Ubuntu 10.04 LTS : linux vulnerabilities (USN-1168-1)
packetstorm via4
data source https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/download/105078/USN-1202-1.txt
id PACKETSTORM:105078
last seen 2016-12-05
published 2011-09-14
reporter Ubuntu
source https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/105078/Ubuntu-Security-Notice-USN-1202-1.html
title Ubuntu Security Notice USN-1202-1
redhat via4
rpms
  • kernel-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-bootwrapper-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-debug-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-debug-devel-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-devel-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-doc-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-firmware-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-headers-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-kdump-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • kernel-kdump-devel-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
  • perf-0:2.6.32-131.2.1.el6
refmap via4
bid 47503
confirm
mlist
  • [netdev] 20110420 Add missing socket check in can/bcm release.
  • [oss-security] 20110420 CVE request: kernel: missing socket check in can/bcm release
  • [oss-security] 20110420 Re: CVE request: kernel: missing socket check in can/bcm release
  • [oss-security] 20110421 Re: CVE request: kernel: missing socket check in can/bcm release
  • [oss-security] 20110422 Re: CVE request: kernel: missing socket check in can/bcm release
  • [oss-security] 20110425 Re: CVE request: kernel: missing socket check in can/bcm release
Last major update 19-03-2012 - 00:00
Published 09-05-2011 - 18:55
Back to Top