ID CVE-2010-4252
Summary OpenSSL before 1.0.0c, when J-PAKE is enabled, does not properly validate the public parameters in the J-PAKE protocol, which allows remote attackers to bypass the need for knowledge of the shared secret, and successfully authenticate, by sending crafted values in each round of the protocol.
References
Vulnerable Configurations
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.5 Beta2
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.5:beta2
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.5a
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.5a
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.5a Beta1
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.5a:beta1
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.5a Beta2
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.5a:beta2
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.3a
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.3a
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.4
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.4
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.5
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.5
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.5 Beta1
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.5:beta1
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6a
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6a
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta1
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6a:beta1
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta2
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6a:beta2
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6a Beta3
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6a:beta3
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6 Beta1
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6:beta1
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6 Beta2
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6:beta2
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6 Beta3
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6:beta3
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0 Beta1
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0:beta1
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6g
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6g
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0 Beta3
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0:beta3
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6f
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6f
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6i
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6i
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0 Beta4
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0:beta4
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6h
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6h
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6c
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6c
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6b
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6b
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6e
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6e
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6d
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6d
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8g
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8g
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta1
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7:beta1
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta3
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7:beta3
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8f
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8f
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta2
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7:beta2
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6k
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6k
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6j
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6j
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6m
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6m
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.6l
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.6l
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0 Beta5
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0:beta5
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8n
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8n
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8o
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8o
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.3
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.3
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.2b
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.2b
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.1c
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.1c
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8l
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8l
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8p
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8p
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8h
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8h
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8m
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8m
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8k
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8k
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7m
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7m
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0a
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0a
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7 Beta6
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7:beta6
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7a
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7a
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7 Beta4
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7:beta4
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8i
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8i
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7 Beta5
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7:beta5
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0 Beta2
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0:beta2
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8j
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8j
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7d
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7d
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7e
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7e
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7b
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7b
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7c
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7c
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7h
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7h
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7i
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7i
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7f
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7f
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7g
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7g
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8a
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8a
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7j
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7j
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7k
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7k
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.7l
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.7l
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8e
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8e
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8c
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8c
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8b
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8b
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 0.9.8d
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8d
  • OpenSSL Project OpenSSL 1.0.0b
    cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.0b
CVSS
Base: 7.5 (as of 07-12-2010 - 14:55)
Impact:
Exploitability:
CWE CWE-287
CAPEC
  • Authentication Abuse
    An attacker obtains unauthorized access to an application, service or device either through knowledge of the inherent weaknesses of an authentication mechanism, or by exploiting a flaw in the authentication scheme's implementation. In such an attack an authentication mechanism is functioning but a carefully controlled sequence of events causes the mechanism to grant access to the attacker. This attack may exploit assumptions made by the target's authentication procedures, such as assumptions regarding trust relationships or assumptions regarding the generation of secret values. This attack differs from Authentication Bypass attacks in that Authentication Abuse allows the attacker to be certified as a valid user through illegitimate means, while Authentication Bypass allows the user to access protected material without ever being certified as an authenticated user. This attack does not rely on prior sessions established by successfully authenticating users, as relied upon for the "Exploitation of Session Variables, Resource IDs and other Trusted Credentials" attack patterns.
  • Exploiting Trust in Client (aka Make the Client Invisible)
    An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
  • Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Register Man in the Middle
    This attack utilizes a REST(REpresentational State Transfer)-style applications' trust in the system resources and environment to place man in the middle once SSL is terminated. Rest applications premise is that they leverage existing infrastructure to deliver web services functionality. An example of this is a Rest application that uses HTTP Get methods and receives a HTTP response with an XML document. These Rest style web services are deployed on existing infrastructure such as Apache and IIS web servers with no SOAP stack required. Unfortunately from a security standpoint, there frequently is no interoperable identity security mechanism deployed, so Rest developers often fall back to SSL to deliver security. In large data centers, SSL is typically terminated at the edge of the network - at the firewall, load balancer, or router. Once the SSL is terminated the HTTP request is in the clear (unless developers have hashed or encrypted the values, but this is rare). The attacker can utilize a sniffer such as Wireshark to snapshot the credentials, such as username and password that are passed in the clear once SSL is terminated. Once the attacker gathers these credentials, they can submit requests to the web service provider just as authorized user do. There is not typically an authentication on the client side, beyond what is passed in the request itself so once this is compromised, then this is generally sufficient to compromise the service's authentication scheme.
  • Man in the Middle Attack
    This type of attack targets the communication between two components (typically client and server). The attacker places himself in the communication channel between the two components. Whenever one component attempts to communicate with the other (data flow, authentication challenges, etc.), the data first goes to the attacker, who has the opportunity to observe or alter it, and it is then passed on to the other component as if it was never intercepted. This interposition is transparent leaving the two compromised components unaware of the potential corruption or leakage of their communications. The potential for Man-in-the-Middle attacks yields an implicit lack of trust in communication or identify between two components.
Access
VectorComplexityAuthentication
NETWORK LOW NONE
Impact
ConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
PARTIAL PARTIAL PARTIAL
nessus via4
  • NASL family Slackware Local Security Checks
    NASL id SLACKWARE_SSA_2010-340-01.NASL
    description New openssl packages are available for Slackware 11.0, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 13.0, 13.1, and -current to fix security issues.
    last seen 2018-09-01
    modified 2018-06-27
    plugin id 51063
    published 2010-12-08
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=51063
    title Slackware 11.0 / 12.0 / 12.1 / 12.2 / 13.0 / 13.1 / current : openssl (SSA:2010-340-01)
  • NASL family Gentoo Local Security Checks
    NASL id GENTOO_GLSA-201110-01.NASL
    description The remote host is affected by the vulnerability described in GLSA-201110-01 (OpenSSL: Multiple vulnerabilities) Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in OpenSSL. Please review the CVE identifiers referenced below for details. Impact : A context-dependent attacker could cause a Denial of Service, possibly execute arbitrary code, bypass intended key requirements, force the downgrade to unintended ciphers, bypass the need for knowledge of shared secrets and successfully authenticate, bypass CRL validation, or obtain sensitive information in applications that use OpenSSL. Workaround : There is no known workaround at this time.
    last seen 2018-09-01
    modified 2018-07-11
    plugin id 56425
    published 2011-10-10
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=56425
    title GLSA-201110-01 : OpenSSL: Multiple vulnerabilities
  • NASL family F5 Networks Local Security Checks
    NASL id F5_BIGIP_SOL17382.NASL
    description OpenSSL before 1.0.0c, when J-PAKE is enabled, does not properly validate the public parameters in the J-PAKE protocol, which allows remote attackers to bypass the need for knowledge of the shared secret, and successfully authenticate, by sending crafted values in each round of the protocol. (CVE-2010-4252)
    last seen 2018-09-02
    modified 2018-07-10
    plugin id 86330
    published 2015-10-12
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=86330
    title F5 Networks BIG-IP : OpenSSL vulnerability (K17382)
  • NASL family Misc.
    NASL id VMWARE_VMSA-2012-0013_REMOTE.NASL
    description The remote VMware ESX / ESXi host is missing a security-related patch. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities, including remote code execution vulnerabilities, in several third-party libraries : - Apache Struts - glibc - GnuTLS - JRE - kernel - libxml2 - OpenSSL - Perl - popt and rpm
    last seen 2018-09-01
    modified 2018-08-16
    plugin id 89038
    published 2016-02-29
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=89038
    title VMware ESX / ESXi Third-Party Libraries Multiple Vulnerabilities (VMSA-2012-0013) (remote check)
  • NASL family Web Servers
    NASL id OPENSSL_1_0_0C.NASL
    description According to its banner, the remote web server is running a version of OpenSSL older than 0.9.8q or 1.0.0c. Such versions are potentially affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - It may be possible to downgrade the ciphersuite to a weaker version by modifying the stored session cache ciphersuite. - An error exists in the J-PAKE implementation that could lead to successful validation by someone with no knowledge of the shared secret.
    last seen 2018-09-01
    modified 2018-07-16
    plugin id 51058
    published 2010-12-07
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=51058
    title OpenSSL < 0.9.8q / 1.0.0c Multiple Vulnerabilities
  • NASL family Misc.
    NASL id VMWARE_ESXI_5_0_BUILD_912577_REMOTE.NASL
    description The remote VMware ESXi 5.0 host is affected by Multiple Vulnerabilities : - An integer overflow condition exists in the __tzfile_read() function in the glibc library. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this, via a crafted timezone (TZ) file, to cause a denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2009-5029) - ldd in the glibc library is affected by a privilege escalation vulnerability due to the omission of certain LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS checks in a crafted executable file. Note that this vulnerability is disputed by the library vendor. (CVE-2009-5064) - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the glibc library due to an integer signedness error in the elf_get_dynamic_info() function when the '--verify' option is used. A remote attacker can exploit this by using a crafted ELF program with a negative value for a certain d_tag structure member in the ELF header. (CVE-2010-0830) - A flaw exists in OpenSSL due to a failure to properly prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled. A remote attacker can exploit this to force a downgrade to an unintended cipher by intercepting the network traffic to discover a session identifier. (CVE-2010-4180) - A flaw exists in OpenSSL due to a failure to properly validate the public parameters in the J-PAKE protocol when J-PAKE is enabled. A remote attacker can exploit this, by sending crafted values in each round of the protocol, to bypass the need for knowledge of the shared secret. (CVE-2010-4252) - A out-of-bounds memory error exists in OpenSSL that allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service or possibly obtain sensitive information by using a malformed ClientHello handshake message. This is also known as the 'OCSP stapling vulnerability'. (CVE-2011-0014) - A flaw exists in the addmntent() function in the glibc library due to a failure to report the error status for failed attempts to write to the /etc/mtab file. A local attacker can exploit this to corrupt the file by using writes from a process with a small RLIMIT_FSIZE value. (CVE-2011-1089) - A flaw exists in the png_set_text_2() function in the file pngset.c in the libpng library due to a failure to properly allocate memory. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this, via a crafted text chunk in a PNG image file, to trigger a heap-based buffer overflow, resulting in denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2011-3048) - A flaw exists in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL due to performing a MAC check only if certain padding is valid. A remote attacker can exploit this, via a padding oracle attack, to recover the plaintext. (CVE-2011-4108) - A double-free error exists in OpenSSL when the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK is enabled. A remote attacker can exploit this by triggering a policy check failure, resulting in an unspecified impact. (CVE-2011-4109) - A flaw exists in OpenSSL in the SSL 3.0 implementation due to improper initialization of data structures used for block cipher padding. A remote attacker can exploit this, by decrypting the padding data sent by an SSL peer, to obtain sensitive information. (CVE-2011-4576) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in OpenSSL when RFC 3779 support is enabled. A remote attacker can exploit this to cause an assertion failure, by using an X.509 certificate containing certificate extension data associated with IP address blocks or Autonomous System (AS) identifiers. (CVE-2011-4577) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the RPC implementation in the glibc library due to a flaw in the svc_run() function. A remote attacker can exploit this, via large number of RPC connections, to exhaust CPU resources. (CVE-2011-4609) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the Server Gated Cryptography (SGC) implementation in OpenSSL due to a failure to properly handle handshake restarts. A remote attacker can exploit this, via unspecified vectors, to exhaust CPU resources. (CVE-2011-4619) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in OpenSSL due to improper support of DTLS applications. A remote attacker can exploit this, via unspecified vectors related to an out-of-bounds read error. Note that this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4108. (CVE-2012-0050) - A security bypass vulnerability exists in the glibc library due to an integer overflow condition in the vfprintf() function in file stdio-common/vfprintf.c. An attacker can exploit this, by using a large number of arguments, to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE protection mechanism, allowing format string attacks or writing to arbitrary memory. (CVE-2012-0864) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the glibc library in the vfprintf() function in file stdio-common/vfprintf.c due to a failure to properly calculate a buffer length. An attacker can exploit this, via a format string that uses positional parameters and many format specifiers, to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism, thus causing stack corruption and a crash. (CVE-2012-3404) - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the glibc library in the vfprintf() function in file stdio-common/vfprintf.c due to a failure to properly calculate a buffer length. An attacker can exploit this, via a format string with a large number of format specifiers, to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism, thus triggering desynchronization within the buffer size handling, resulting in a segmentation fault and crash. (CVE-2012-3405) - A flaw exists in the glibc library in the vfprintf() function in file stdio-common/vfprintf.c due to a failure to properly restrict the use of the alloca() function when allocating the SPECS array. An attacker can exploit this, via a crafted format string using positional parameters and a large number of format specifiers, to bypass the FORTIFY_SOURCE format-string protection mechanism, thus triggering a denial of service or the possible execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2012-3406) - A flaw exists in the glibc library due to multiple integer overflow conditions in the strtod(), strtof(), strtold(), strtod_l(), and other unspecified related functions. A local attacker can exploit these to trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, resulting in an application crash or the possible execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2012-3480) - A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (VMCI) due to a failure by control code to properly restrict memory allocation. A local attacker can exploit this, via unspecified vectors, to gain privileges. (CVE-2013-1406) - An error exists in the implementation of the Network File Copy (NFC) protocol. A man-in-the-middle attacker can exploit this, by modifying the client-server data stream, to cause a denial of service or the execution of arbitrary code. (CVE-2013-1659)
    last seen 2018-11-17
    modified 2018-11-15
    plugin id 70885
    published 2013-11-13
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=70885
    title ESXi 5.0 < Build 912577 Multiple Vulnerabilities (remote check)
  • NASL family VMware ESX Local Security Checks
    NASL id VMWARE_VMSA-2012-0013.NASL
    description a. vCenter and ESX update to JRE 1.6.0 Update 31 The Oracle (Sun) JRE is updated to version 1.6.0_31, which addresses multiple security issues. Oracle has documented the CVE identifiers that are addressed by this update in the Oracle Java SE Critical Patch Update Advisory of February 2012. b. vCenter Update Manager update to JRE 1.5.0 Update 36 The Oracle (Sun) JRE is updated to 1.5.0_36 to address multiple security issues. Oracle has documented the CVE identifiers that are addressed in JRE 1.5.0_36 in the Oracle Java SE Critical Patch Update Advisory for June 2012. c. Update to ESX/ESXi userworld OpenSSL library The ESX/ESXi userworld OpenSSL library is updated from version 0.9.8p to version 0.9.8t to resolve multiple security issues. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the names CVE-2010-4180, CVE-2010-4252, CVE-2011-0014, CVE-2011-4108, CVE-2011-4109, CVE-2011-4576, CVE-2011-4577, CVE-2011-4619, and CVE-2012-0050 to these issues. d. Update to ESX service console OpenSSL RPM The service console OpenSSL RPM is updated to version 0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3 to resolve a security issue. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CVE-2012-2110 to this issue. e. Update to ESX service console kernel The ESX service console kernel is updated to resolve multiple security issues. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the names CVE-2011-1833, CVE-2011-2484, CVE-2011-2496, CVE-2011-3188, CVE-2011-3209, CVE-2011-3363, CVE-2011-4110, CVE-2011-1020, CVE-2011-4132, CVE-2011-4324, CVE-2011-4325, CVE-2012-0207, CVE-2011-2699, and CVE-2012-1583 to these issues. f. Update to ESX service console Perl RPM The ESX service console Perl RPM is updated to perl-5.8.8.32.1.8999.vmw to resolve multiple security issues. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the names CVE-2010-2761, CVE-2010-4410, and CVE-2011-3597 to these issues. g. Update to ESX service console libxml2 RPMs The ESX service console libmxl2 RPMs are updated to libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.15.el5_8.2 and libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.15.el5_8.2 to resolve a security issue. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CVE-2012-0841 to this issue. h. Update to ESX service console glibc RPM The ESX service console glibc RPM is updated to version glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.1 to resolve multiple security issues. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the names CVE-2009-5029, CVE-2009-5064, CVE-2010-0830, CVE-2011-1089, CVE-2011-4609, and CVE-2012-0864 to these issue. i. Update to ESX service console GnuTLS RPM The ESX service console GnuTLS RPM is updated to version 1.4.1-7.el5_8.2 to resolve multiple security issues. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the names CVE-2011-4128, CVE-2012-1569, and CVE-2012-1573 to these issues. j. Update to ESX service console popt, rpm, rpm-libs, and rpm-python RPMS The ESX service console popt, rpm, rpm-libs, and rpm-python RPMS are updated to the following versions to resolve multiple security issues : - popt-1.10.2.3-28.el5_8 - rpm-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 - rpm-libs-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 - rpm-python-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8 The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CVE-2012-0060, CVE-2012-0061, and CVE-2012-0815 to these issues. k. Vulnerability in third-party Apache Struts component The version of Apache Struts in vCenter Operations has been updated to 2.3.4 which addresses an arbitrary file overwrite vulnerability. This vulnerability allows an attacker to create a denial of service by overwriting arbitrary files without authentication. The attacker would need to be on the same network as the system where vCOps is installed. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CVE-2012-0393 to this issue. Note: Apache struts 2.3.4 addresses the following issues as well : CVE-2011-5057, CVE-2012-0391, CVE-2012-0392, CVE-2012-0394. It was found that these do not affect vCOps. VMware would like to thank Alexander Minozhenko from ERPScan for reporting this issue to us.
    last seen 2018-09-07
    modified 2018-09-06
    plugin id 61747
    published 2012-08-31
    reporter Tenable
    source https://www.tenable.com/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=61747
    title VMSA-2012-0013 : VMware vSphere and vCOps updates to third-party libraries
oval via4
accepted 2015-05-04T04:00:14.203-04:00
class vulnerability
contributors
  • name Sergey Artykhov
    organization ALTX-SOFT
  • name Maria Mikhno
    organization ALTX-SOFT
definition_extensions
comment VisualSVN Server is installed
oval oval:org.mitre.oval:def:18636
description OpenSSL before 1.0.0c, when J-PAKE is enabled, does not properly validate the public parameters in the J-PAKE protocol, which allows remote attackers to bypass the need for knowledge of the shared secret, and successfully authenticate, by sending crafted values in each round of the protocol.
family windows
id oval:org.mitre.oval:def:19039
status accepted
submitted 2013-10-02T13:00:00
title OpenSSL vulnerability before 1.0.0c in VisualSVN Server (CVE-2010-4252)
version 8
refmap via4
bid 45163
confirm
hp
  • HPSBOV02670
  • HPSBUX02638
  • SSRT100339
  • SSRT100475
misc
sectrack 1024823
secunia
  • 42469
  • 57353
slackware SSA:2010-340-01
vupen
  • ADV-2010-3120
  • ADV-2010-3122
vmware via4
description The ESX/ESXi userworld OpenSSL library is updated from version 0.9.8p to version 0.9.8t to resolve multiple security issues.
id VMSA-2012-0013
last_updated 2012-12-20T00:00:00
published 2012-08-30T00:00:00
title Update to ESX/ESXi userworld OpenSSL library
Last major update 22-08-2016 - 22:02
Published 06-12-2010 - 16:05
Last modified 18-09-2017 - 21:31
Back to Top